Madras High Court

WP/30433/2026 of MAGUDAPATHY Vs The Additional chief secretary to Govenrment on 1 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:01.09.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN

AND

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE E.MANOHARAN

Writ Petition No.30433 of 2026

Magudapathy,

S/o Nanjappan

D.No.2/115,

Kothamangalam Village and Post,

Paramathi Velur Taluk,

Nanjappagoundampalayam,

Namakkal District.

.. Petitioner

/versus/

1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

2.The District Collector,

Office of the District Collector,

Tiruchengode Road,

Namakkal District.

3.The Tahsildar,

Paramathi Velur Taluk,

Namakkal District.

.. Respondents

Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to pass an order in the revision and stay petition filed by the petitioner on 14.08.2025 U/s 10(A), (B) of Land Encroachment Act, 1905 and further direct the respondents not to proceed with Section 6

order until disposal of Revision.

For Petitioner

:Mr.M.Elango

For Respondents :Mr.B.Sivakollapan, AGP

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

(ORDER OF THE COURT WAS MADE BY DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.) The writ petition has been filed, being aggrieved by the order of eviction in the revision and stay petition under Section 10(A)(B) of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, on 14.08.2025. Though one year has gone, no order has been passed by the first respondent in the revision petition. Hence, the present writ petition.

2. The learned Additional Government Pleader, after taking notice, on instruction, submitted that the revision petition will be decided on merits within a reasonable time.

3. Considering the pendency of the revision petition for nearly one year, we direct the first respondent to dispose of the writ petition preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. (Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.) (E.MANOHARAN,J.) 01.09.2026 ari Index:yes/no Neutral citation:yes/no To

1. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

2. The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Tiruchengode Road, Namakkal District.

3. The Tahsildar,Paramathi Velur Taluk, Namakkal District.

Dr.G. JAYACHANDRAN,J. AND E.MANOHARAN,J. ari W.P.No.30433 of 2026 01.09.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead