Madras High Court

CONT P/2321/2026 of Ramesh Kumar Vs Mr. Nagoor Meerasa and another on 27 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CONT P No. 2321 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27-08-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

CONT P No. 2321 of 2026

Ramesh Kumar,

S/o. Ezhumalai,

Kookuttapatti Village,

Kadayampatti Taluk,

Salem District.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. Mr. Nagoor Meerasa

The Tahsildar,

Kadayampatti Taluk, Salem District.

2. Mrs. Lakshmi,

The Inspector of Police,

Theevattipatti Police Station,

Salem District.

..Contemnor(s)

Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondents for their wilful and wanton disobedience of order passed in C.M.P.No. 27118 of 2025 in W.A.No. 3311 of 2025 dated 07.11.2025.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr. M.Elango

For Contemnor(s):

Mr.A.R.Suresh,

Special Government Pleader, for R1

Mr.Durai Gunasekaran,

Government Advocate, for R2

CONT P No. 2321 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The present contempt petition has been instituted to punish the respondents for their disobedience of the interim order dated 07.11.2025 passed by this Court in C.M.P.No.27118 of 2025 in W.A.No.3311 of 2025.

2. The interim stay of the impugned writ order has been granted by this Court in the said writ appeal.

3. The learned Special Government Pleader would submit that a survey has been conducted by the revenue authorities in the presence of the petitioner.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the fact that the survey has been conducted. However, the rights of the parties cannot be determined by the revenue authorities. That being so, this Court finds that there is no wilful disobedience of the order of this Court established for invoking the contempt jurisdiction.

5. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition stands closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (M.S.Q.,J.) 27-08-2026 mk

CONT P No. 2321 of 2026

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. mk CONT P No. 2321 of 2026 27-08-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead