Central Administrative Tribunal

NARENDRA KUMAR PANDEY vs WEST CENTRAL RAILWAY on 14 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,

JABALPUR BENCH, JABALPUR

(Through video conferencing)

this the 14st day of October , 2026

HON’BLE MR. RAJINDER SINGH DOGRA, JUDICIAL MEMBER

HON’BLE SMT. MALLIKA ARYA, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER

Original Application No. 964 of 2026

Narendra Kumar Pandey, aged about 56 years, S/o Shri Chandradev Pandey, Working as a Sr. Sunter (Loco Pilot Shunter-I), office of Chief Crew Controller, Satna, West Central Railway, Satna, District – Satna (M.P) - 485001.

-Applicant

Advocate for the applicant:

Shri Amit Kumar Bajpai

V e r s u s

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The Union of India through General Manager, West Central Railway, Jabalpur Zone, Indira Market, South Civil Lines, Jabalpur Division, Jabalpur, District – Jabalpur (M.P) - 482001.

2. Principal Chief Operating Manager, WCR, Office of General Manager, Indira Market, South Civil Line, Jabalpur Division, Jabalpur, District – Jabalpur (M.P) - 482001.

3. Divisional Electric Engineer (T.R.O), West Central Railway, DRM Office, South Civil Line, Jabalpur Division, Jabalpur, District – Jabalpur (M.P) - 482001.

4. Divisional Railway Manager (Personnel), West Central Railway, DRM Office, South Civil Line, Jabalpur Division, Jabalpur, District – Jabalpur (M.P) - 482001.

-Respondents Advocate for the respondents: Shri Surendra Pratap Singh O R D E R (O R A L)

By Mallika Arya.-

At the outset, the learned counsel for the applicant has contended that for redressal of his grievance, the applicant has already preferred a 2026.10.16 17:02:05+05'30' ANAND PRAKASH DUBEY

representation dated 22.05.2026 (Annexure A-6 of OA) before the Divisional Railway Manager (Personnel), West Central Railway, Jabalpur (respondent no. 4) and the applicant would be satisfied, if a direction is given to the said respondent to decide aforesaid representation in the light of prayer made therein within a specified time.

2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents has opposed the prayer of the applicant and submitted that no such direction can be given at this stage.

3. However, Having regard to the innocuous prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant, Divisional Railway Manager (Personnel), West Central Railway, Jabalpur (respondent no. 4) is directed to decide the representation of the applicant dated 22.05.2026 (Annexure A-6) by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The applicant shall file a copy of this order along with copy of OA with annexures before the respondent no. 3. A copy of the reasoned and speaking order shall be communicated to the applicant forthwith.

4. With the above direction, the O.A is disposed of.

5. There shall be no order as to costs.

6. It is made clear that nothing has been expressed on the merits of the case. (Smt. Mallika Arya)

(Rajinder Singh Dogra) Administrative Member

Judicial Member Anand… 2026.10.16 17:02:05+05'30' ANAND PRAKASH DUBEY

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead