Madras High Court

REV.APLW/168/2023 of B.Balamurugan Vs The Judicial Recruitment cell on 27 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

REV.APLW No. 168 of 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27-08-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

REV.APLW No. 168 of 2023

B.Balamurugan

S/o. K.Baskaran,

No. 22/A, Balasubramaniam Nagar,

Sirkazhi, Sirkazhi Taluk,

Mayiladuthurai District

..Applicant

Vs

1. The Judicial Recruitment cell

Rep. by the Registrar General,

High Court, Chennai 104.

2. The Registrar (Recruitment)

High Court, Chennai 104.

3. I.Suresh (Roll No. 1942210067)

Vaimedu Village, Vedaranyam Taluk,

Nagapattinam District

..Respondent(s)

Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of CPC, praying to review the order dated 05.06.2023 passed in W.P. No 778 of 2023 and allow the writ petition.

For Applicant(s):

Mr.S.Sadasharam

For Respondent(s):

R1 & R2 – No appearance

Mr.R.Muruga Bharathi, for R3

REV.APLW No. 168 of 2023

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) A perusal of the grounds raised in the present review application would show that an attempt has been made to re-adjudicate the issues on merits between the parties. Such an adjudication is impermissible in view of the limited scope of reviewing an order under Order XLVII Rule 1 of CPC. The scope of review powers cannot be extended to re-appreciate documents and to rewrite the findings made by the Court. The grounds for an appeal cannot been considered as grounds to review the order.

2. In the present case, except for raising grounds on merits, the petitioner has not established any error apparent warranting the exercise of the review powers of this Court. Thus, the Review Application stands dismissed. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (M.S.Q.,J.) 27-08-2026 Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No Speaking / Non-speaking order mk To

1. The Judicial Recruitment cell Rep. by the Registrar General, High Court, Chennai 104

2. The Registrar (Recruitment ) High Court, Chennai 104

REV.APLW No. 168 of 2023

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. mk REV.APLW No. 168 of 2023 27-08-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead