Madras High Court

REV.APPL/186/2024 of M. PARTHIBAN Vs Environment and Forests Department on 27 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27-08-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

Review Application No.186 of 2024

M.Parthiban

S/o.G.Murugesan,

Selection Grade Assistant,

District Forest Office, Thiruvannamalai

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Government of Tamilnadu,

Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Environment and Forests Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9

2. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai-15

3. The Chairman,

Departmental Selection Board and Chief

Conservator of Forests (P and V)

O/o.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Panagal Buildings, Saidapet, Chennai-15

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: PRAYER: Review Application filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 and 2 of Civil Procedure Code read with Section 114 of CPC, to review the order made in WA No.2149/2022 dated 09.01.2024 on the file of this Court.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.M.C.Swamy

For Respondent(s):

Mrs.Y.Kavitha

Additional Government Pleader

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The present review petition has been filed seeking review of the orders of this Court dated 09.01.2024, passed in W.A.No.2149 of 2022.

2. Perusal of the grounds raised in the present review petition would show that petitioner has made an attempt to re-adjudicate the issues on merits.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that a representation submitted by the petitioner on 08.09.2022 is to be considered. However, such a direction cannot be issued in a review proceeding unless an error apparent on record is established, power of review need not be exercised by the Courts.

4. In the present case, no such error apparent on record has been established and therefore, the Review Application is dismissed. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (M.S.Q.,J.) 27-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No MKA

To:

1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Environment and Forests Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.

2. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai-15

3. The Chairman, Departmental Selection Board and Chief Conservator of Forests (P and V) O/o.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Panagal Buildings, Saidapet, Chennai-15

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ J. MKA REV.APPL No.186 of 2024 27-08-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead