Madras High Court
WA/3416/2023 of THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT Vs E.MUNUSAMY on 25 August 2026
WA No. 3416 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28-08-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNASWAMY GOVINDARAJAN
WA No. 3416 of 2023 AND
CMP NO. 27984 OF 2023
1. The Secretary To Government
Home Department, Secretariat, Fort St.
George, Chennai-600 009.
2. The Director General Of Police
Santhome High Road, Mylapore,
Chennai-600 004
3. The Superintendent Of Police
Venkikkal, Tiruvanamalai-606 604
4. The Deputy Superintendent Of
Police, Tiruvanamalai (Rural), Muthuvinayagar Koil Street, Tiruvanamalai-606 601
..Appellants
Vs
E.Munusamy
S/o.Elumalai, Chinnakankeyanur Village,
Pallikondapattu Post-606 611, Tiruvanamalai Taluk and District
..Respondent
Prayer : Writ Appeal under Clause XV of the Letters Patent to set aside the order Dated 02.09.2022 and made in WP.No. 34381 of 2016.
( Uploaded on: 31/08/2026 01:50:06 pm )
WA No. 3416 of 2023
For Appellants :
Mr.A.R.Suresh,
Special Government Pleader
For Respondent :
Mr.S.Jeevitharamani
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Judgment
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam J.) State preferred the present intra court appeal challenging the writ order dated 02.09.2022 made in W.P.No.34381 of 2016.
2. The respondent instituted the writ petition seeking a direction to regularise the services of the petitioner in the post Sweeper and consequently sanction the regular time scale of pay and all other consequential benefits. The writ court had recorded the counter affidavit dated 17.01.2018 filed by the respondents therein in Para 3 of the writ order impugned and disposed of the writ petition. The writ Court has further stated that the official respondents shall pass appropriate orders on the proposals sent by the Superintendent of Police.
3. Therefore, if at all the respondent is otherwise qualified in accordance with the Service Rules, his case may be considered as recorded by the writ court in the order impugned.
( Uploaded on: 31/08/2026 01:50:06 pm )
WA No. 3416 of 2023
4. With the above observation, the writ appeal stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.G.R.,J.) 28-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No KST
( Uploaded on: 31/08/2026 01:50:06 pm )
WA No. 3416 of 2023
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND KRISHNASWAMY GOVINDARAJAN J. KST WA No. 3416 of 2023 AND CMP NO. 27984 OF 2023 28-08-2026
( Uploaded on: 31/08/2026 01:50:06 pm )