Madras High Court

REV.APLW/56/2026 of EBY THOMAS Vs The Member secretary on 21 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

REV.APLW No. 56 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21-08-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN

REV.APLW No. 56 of 2026

Eby Thomas

S/o. MD Thomas, No.480/C, Bazar Main Road Ram Nagar, Madipakkam, Chennai 600 091.

..Petitioner

Vs

1. The Member Secretary

Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Maligai, No. 1 Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai 08.

2. Parvathi Stree Bay View Flat Owners Welfare Association, Having Regn.No.SRG, Chennai South / 489 / 2019, Rep.by Secretary, Parvathi Street, Kalakshetra Colony, Besant Nagar, Chennai 600 090.

3. Kgeyes Eternity Flat Owners Welfare

Association, Rep By Its Secretary, No. 21

Parvathi Street, Kalashetra Colony, Besant Nagar, Chennai 600 090.

4. The District Collector,

Office Of The District Collector, Singaravelar Maaligai, No.62, Rajaji Salai, Chennai.600 001.

5. The Tahsildar,

Velacherry Taluk, Velacherry,

Chennai.600 113.

..Respondents

REV.APLW No. 56 of 2026

Prayer :To review the order dated 25.07.2025 made in WP no. 8603 of 2025.

For Petitioner :

No appearance

For Respondent(s):

Mr. Daeinn Poovaiah

for Ms. S.Mridula Royan for R1 and

Mr. A.R.Suresh,

Spl. Govt. Pleader for R5.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The relief sought for by the Review Applicant / Petitioner in the writ petition is to direct the first respondent to consider and dispose of the representation.

2. This Court made a finding that mere disposal of the representation dated 04.11.2024 with regard to the cancellation of planning permission as well as demolition of a multistoreyed building is innocuous prayer and therefore the writ petition per se is not entertainable. Now again the petitioner has made an attempt to adjudicate the grounds in a review petition, which is impermissible.

REV.APLW No. 56 of 2026

3. Since there is no error apparent on record is established, the Review Application stands dismissed. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (M.J.R.,J.) 21-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No KST To

1. The Member secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Maligai, No. 1 Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai 08.

2. The District Collector, Office Of The District Collector, Singaravelar Maaligai, No.62, Rajaji Salai, Chennai.600 001.

3. The Tahsildar, Velacherry Taluk, Velacherry, Chennai.600 113.

REV.APLW No. 56 of 2026

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND M.JOTHIRAMAN J. KST REV.APLW No. 56 of 2026 21-08-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead