Madras High Court
REV.APPL/64/2025 of S. PACKIARAJ Vs THE MANAGEMENT on 21 August 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21-08-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN
REV.APPL No.64 of 2025 IN
W.A.No.3548 of 2023
S.Packiaraj
… Applicant
-vs-
1. The Management
M/s.Brakes India Limited,
Presently Brakes India (P) Ltd,
Padi, Chennai – 50.
2. The Presiding Officer
I Additional Labour Court,
High Court Building, Chennai - 104.
… Respondents
Prayer: Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 & 2 r/w Section 114 of CPC to review the judgment dated 14.10.2024 in W.A.Nos.3548 and 3249 of 2023 and pleased to direct the respondent Management to pay the provident fund, gratuity and other outstanding payments of the applicant with interest till 14.01.1995, the date of approval under Section 33(2) of the I.D.Act with further interest till the date of payment after deduct the fixed deposit made by the management as per the order of this Honble Court dated 2014.
For Applicant:
Mr.C.K.Chandrasekkar
For Respondents:
Mr.Anand Gopalan
For M/s.Advit Law Chambers for R1
R2-Labour Court
*****
( Uploaded on: 31/08/2026 05:45:24 pm )
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam,J.) This Court passed final order in Writ Appeal on 14.10.2024 and by recording the terms of settlement, the said Writ Appeal was closed.
2. The present Review Application has ben filed on the ground that certain terms of settlement have not been complied with and Provident Fund amount due to Review Applicant has not been settled.
3. Per contra, learned counsel for the 1st respondent / Management would oppose, by stating that the entire amount due to Review Applicant has been settled.
4. Dispute with reference to terms of settlement cannot be entertained in Review proceedings. Writ Appeal was disposed of merely recording the terms of settlement agreed between parties. That being the factum, the present Review Application is unnecessary.
( Uploaded on: 31/08/2026 05:45:24 pm )
Consequently, the present Review Application is dismissed. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (M.J.R.,J.) 21-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No AR To: The Presiding Officer I Additional Labour Court, High Court Building, Chennai – 600 104.
( Uploaded on: 31/08/2026 05:45:24 pm )
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J. AND M.JOTHIRAMAN,J. AR REV.APPL No.64 of 2025 IN W.A.No.3548 of 2023 21-08-2026
( Uploaded on: 31/08/2026 05:45:24 pm )