Madras High Court

CRP/5153/2026 of Neethi Agency Vs Pepsi Cola India Marketing Co. on 18 August 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

CRP No. 5153 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18-08-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI

CRP No. 5153 of 2026

Neethi Agency,

Rep by its Proprietor

R.Subramanian,

S/o. Ramaswamy,

No.1, Parthasarathy Street,

M.C.Road, Chennai - 600 021

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

Pepsi Cola India Marketing Co.,

Rep by its Vice President,

No.90, Anna Salai,

3rd Floor, Wellington Plaza,

Chennai - 600 002.

..Respondent(s)

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 227 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to the Execution Judge in-charge in E.P.IX Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai in Execution Petition No.641/2024 and within the time frame of besides speedy disposal.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr. S.Arumugham

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking direction to the IX Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai seeking speedy disposal of E.P. No.641/2024, within a time frame fixed by this court.

CRP No. 5153 of 2026

2. The petitioner is a decree holder in E.P.No.641 of 2024. The petitioner had filed O.S.No.639 of 2022 seeking recovery of money, payable by the respondent/judgment debtor. The said suit was decreed on 30.08.2023 and in order to execute the decree, E.P.No.641 of 2024 has also been filed.

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that, despite pendency of E.P. from January 2024, the respondent/Judgment Debtor, denying fruits of the decree, has been protracting the proceedings by filing some application or other in the execution proceedings, in order to thwart the execution of the decree in favour of the petitioner.

4. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Periyammal (Dead) through LRs and others Vs. V.Rajamani & another reported in (2025) 9 SCC 568 has given directions to the executing court to dispose of the execution petitions, within a period of 6 months. Admittedly, the execution petition is pending for more than 2 years in the instant case. Such view of the matter, I am inclined to dispense with the notice to the respondent, who, in any manner, is not prejudiced by a direction of this court for disposal of the execution petition.

CRP No. 5153 of 2026

5. Accordingly, this civil revision petition is allowed and the IX Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai is directed to expedite the Enquiry in E.P.No.641 of 2024 and shall dispose of the E.P. finally, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the copy of the order. 18-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No MST To The IX Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

CRP No. 5153 of 2026 P.B.BALAJI, J. MST CRP No. 5153 of 2026 18-08-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead