Madras High Court
CRP/4668/2026 of P.C.Doraisamy Vs M.Sellammal on 12 August 2026
CRP No. 4668 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12-08-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
CRP No. 4668 of 2026
and CMP No.20508 of 2026
1. P.C.Doraisamy
S/o Chinnappa Gounder Pudur,
Perumapalayam Thuyyampoondurai Village
Erode Taluk, Erode Dist and another
2. K.Nachimuthu
S/o. Karuppana Gounder T.Mettupalayam,
Pungambadi Village Perundurai Taluk,
Erode Dist
Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. M.Sellammal
W/o. Mariappan No.20, Thiyagabrammam
Street Subramaniam Nagar Salem Taluk
and Dist.
Respondent(s)
Revision filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside the fair and final order dated 05.06.2026 made in I.A.No.8 of 2026 in I.A.No.1143 of 2010 in
I.A.No.1006 of 2010 in O.S.No.169 of 1993 on the file of Court of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Erode.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.C.E.Pratap
For Respondent(s):
Mr.S.Kousik
CRP No. 4668 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard Mr.C.E.Pratap, learned counsel for the revision petitioners and Mr.S.Kousik, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in a suit for Specific Performance which came to be decreed in favour of the petitioners way back on 15.11.1996, in respect of an agreement of sale dated 16.02.1992, the petitioners were constrained to take out an application in I.A.No.1006 of 2010, seeking extension of time to deposit the balance sale consideration. Pending the said application, the petitioners filed an application in I.A.No.3 of 2025, seeking permission to file an additional affidavit to bring on record the subsequent developments to the notice of the trial Court, especially pertaining to land acquisition proceedings and receipt of the compensation in the said proceedings by the respondent. The said application came to be dismissed as against which, it is now brought to my notice by the learned counsel for the respondent Mr.S.Kousik that in CRP No.982 of 2026, I had confirmed the order of dismissal of I.A.No.3 of 2025, clearly referring at Paragraph No.5 of the order that the proposed additional affidavit relating to land acquisition proceedings and receipt of compensation does not have any direct bearing on the issue as to whether the petitioners had deposited
CRP No. 4668 of 2026 the balance sale consideration within the time stipulated.
3. Now, the present application filed, seeking to produce additional documentary evidence, again pertains only to the land acquisition proceedings and receipt of compensation.
4. When this Court has already declined the request of the petitioners for even filing an additional affidavit to bring on record subsequent events, I do not see how the application to produce additional documents in support of the additional affidavit can be entertained.
5. In the light of the above, I do not see any illegality or perversity in the order passed by the trial court warranting interference in revision.
6. Considering that I.A.No.1006 of 2010 has been pending for close to 16 years, I direct the trial Court to dispose of I.A.No.1006 of 2010 on merits and in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
CRP No. 4668 of 2026 P.B.BALAJI.,J sr
7. With the above direction, the civil revision petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 12.08.2026 sr Index:yes/no Website:yes/no Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order To The Principal Subordinate Court, Erode CRP No. 4668 of 2026