Madras High Court
CRP/4827/2026 of Muthulakshmi (died) Vs Ponnammal (Died) on 12 August 2026
C.R.P.No.4827 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.08.2026
CORAM
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
C.R.P.No.4827 of 2026
and
C.M.P.No.21086 of 2026
1. Manimozhi
2. J.Portselvi
... Petitioners
Vs.
Ponnammal (died)
1. Muthulakshmi
2. Thiyagarajan
3. Selvaraj
4. Usha
5. Uma
6. Rukmani
Suguna Centre,
Bharathiyar Street, Tiruppur Road,
Kangayam Town, Kangayam Taluk,
Tiruppur District.
Dhanalakshmi (died)
C.R.P.No.4827 of 2026
7. Bhanumathi
8. Puppy @ Manonmani
Jeeva Boys School
Military Colony,
Royapuram Main Road,
Tiruppur.
Muthusamy (died)
9. Magudeshwaran
10. Pushpa
11. Puppy @ Angulakshmi
Rajamohan (died)
12. Jayalakshmi
13. Kamalam
14. Saraswathi
Annadurai (died)
Lakshmi (died)
15. Appavu
16. Subramani
17. Komali Nadar @ Palanisamy
18. Kannammal
19. Sandhamani
20. Karthikeyan
C.R.P.No.4827 of 2026
Anandan (died)
21. Mageswari
22. Anitha
23. Minor Revathi
Rep by next friend/mother
Mageswari
24. Geethalakshmi
25. Nandhinipriya
26. Minor Vinothini
Rep by next friend/mother
Geethalakshmi
27. Subbiah
28. Ezhil @ Elango
29. Ilavenil @ Mani
30. Thenmozhi
31. Poonguzhali
32. Savithri
Tamilmani (died)
33. Valarmathi
34. Venkatesh
35. Gunasekar
36. Kishore
C.R.P.No.4827 of 2026
37. Abhinav
38. Usharani
39. Vikesh
40. Bhuvanesh
41. Mohan
42. Shanthi
43. Kalyani
44. Senthilkumar
... Respondents
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 15.10.2025 made in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in
I.A.No.193 of 2017 in O.S.No.111 of 2005 on the file of the Sub Court, Kangeyam, by allowing this Civil Revision Petition.
For Petitioners : Mr.N.Manoharan
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that although the application to file an additional counter-affidavit in the final decree application was dismissed by the Trial Court, subsequent events have
C.R.P.No.4827 of 2026 occurred. Specifically, the Commissioner has already inspected the property and filed a report, to which the petitioners have also filed their objections. The learned counsel for the petitioners therefore states that he will be satisfied if the Court considers the petitioners’ objections in an objective manner before passing any further orders in the final decree application.
3. In view of the above, no further orders are necessary in this C.R.P. Consequently, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with a direction to the Trial Court to consider the objections filed by the petitioners to the Advocate Commissioner's Report in the final decree application in an objective manner and thereafter decide the final decree application after giving a fair opportunity to all parties. The final decree proceedings shall be concluded within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 12.08.2026 raja Neutral Citation : Yes / No To The Subordinate Court, Kangeyam
C.R.P.No.4827 of 2026 P.B.BALAJI
, J.
raja C.R.P.No.4827 of 2026 12.08.2026