Madras High Court
CRP/386/2026 of S.Rajinikanth Vs Raja Holding (Firm) on 11 August 2026
CRP No. 386 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11-08-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
CRP No. 386 of 2026
& CMP.No.2186 of 2026
1. S.Rajinikanth
2. R.Meenakshi
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. Raja Holding (Firm)
Rep by its Managing Partner
R.V.Subramaniyam
S/o Venugopal,
No.69, Town High School Road,
Kumbakkonam
N.Navaneetha Krishnan (Died)
N.Gandhimathi (Died)
2. S.Geetha
3. S.Sakthivel
..Respondent(s)
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of CPC, to set aside the docket order of the X Assistant City Civil Court Chennai dated 27.10.2025 in unnumbered IA No.____ of 2025 in EP.No.1164 of 2025 in OS No. 51 of 2013.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.Guru Dhananjay
For Respondent(s):
Mrs.A.L.Gandhimathi
Senior Counsel for Mr.L.Palaimuthu
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This revision petition has been filed to set aside the docket order of the X Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai, dated 27.10.2025 in unnumbered
CRP No. 386 of 2026
I.A.No.____ of 2025 in E.P.No.1164 of 2025 in O.S.No. 51 of 2013.
2. I have heard Mr.Guru Dhananjay, learned counsel for the revision petitioners and Mrs.A.L.Gandhimathi, learned Senior Counsel for Mr.L.Palanimuthu, learned counsel for the respondents.
3. The revision petitioners challenge the order passed in the execution proceedings, directing fresh attachment. The learned counsel for the petitioner would bring to my notice that without filing a condone delay application, the order, to merely set aside the ex-parte order, had been filed. The learned counsel however states that subsequently necessary applications have been filed. He would therefore state that the revision petition may be disposed of, directing the Executing Court to take up the setting aside and condone delay applications filed by the petitioners and dispose of the same expeditiously, after giving an opportunity to the respondent to file a counter.
4. Per contra, the learned Senior Counsel would fairly concede and state that even the condone delay and setting aside applications may be entertained and allowed and directions may be issued to the Executing Court to dispose of the execution petition on merits and in accordance with law.
CRP No. 386 of 2026
4. In the light of the fair submission made by the learned Senior Counsel, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of, in the following manner:
(i) The ex-parte order of attachment dated 27.10.2025 in unnumbered I.A.No.____ of 2025 in EP.No.1164 of 2025 is set aside;
(ii) The applications filed by the petitioners to condone the delay and set aside the ex-parte order shall be formally assigned a number and shall be allowed, in view of the consent expressed by the learned Senior Counsel, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(iii) The main EP shall be enqired into and disposed of, within a period of two months thereafter, in accordance with law. No costs. Connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 11-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ATA To The X Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.
CRP No. 386 of 2026
P.B.BALAJI, J. ATA CRP No. 386 of 2026 11-08-2026