Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./6294/2026 of MOHIT GAUBA & ORS. Vs STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) & ANR. on 29 October 2026

Page 1 of 2 pages

$~35

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of Decision: 29.10.2026

CNR No. DLHC010399752026

+

CRL.M.C. 6294/2026

MOHIT GAUBA & ORS.

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Amit Kumar Rohela and Mr. Adil

Kumar, Advocates with petitioners.

versus

STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State

with Ms. Megha Garg, Advocate with

IO/ASI Om Prakash.

Mr. Prakash Sharma, Advocate with

R-2.

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 50/2023 of PS CWC Nanakpura for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners.

2. State has no objection to this petition. Statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar. GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569 af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d155709 96b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.10.29 18:31:51 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:29.10.2026 18:30:16 Signature Not Verified

Page 1 of 2

Page 2 of 2 pages

3. The respondent no.2 is present in court today and is identified by IO/ASI Om Prakash. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromised all disputes with the petitioners. Marriage between the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 stands already dissolved by way of decree of divorce. One female child was born from the wedlock of petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, who is in the care and custody of respondent no.2. The respondent no.2 submits that she has received complete full and final settlement amount in lieu of her entire stridhan and maintenance. Respondent no.2 submits that now she does not wish to continue prosecution of petitioners.

4. Having spoken with respondent no.2, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through full dress trial.

5. Therefore, the petition is allowed FIR No. 50/2023 of PS CWC Nanakpura for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC as well as proceedings arising out of the same are quashed.

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) OCTOBER 29, 2026/dr

GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4a fec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cac ca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5 d15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c48796 5ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.10.29 18:31:40 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:29.10.2026 18:30:16 Signature Not Verified

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead