Daily order sheet, C2, 26 Oct 2026 on 26 October 2026

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name will be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Kripa Shankar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are physically present.

3. Heard Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents raised preliminary objection that the affidavit of this petition has been notorised at Chandigarh and the petition is filed in Lucknow.

5. On perusal of records it transpires that the petition has been filed and notorised at Lucknow whereas, inadvertently, the place of notorisation of affidavit has been mentioned as Chandigarh in the copy of the respondents.

6. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, the plea of the respondents is overruled.

7. Matter pertains to grant of Maintenance Allowances to the applicant which needs adjudication.

8. Admit.

9. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and allowed four weeks time to file Counter Affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed by the applicant within two weeks, thereafter.

10. Applicant has filed M.A. No. 1277 of 2026 for condonation of delay. On perusal of records, we find that this petition has been filed well in time and there is no need to file the delay condonation application. Therefore, M.A. No. 1277 of 2026 is disposed of accordingly.

11. Member (A) Member (J) Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Suppl. No.2 ) O.A. No. 1066 of 2026 with M.A. No.1281 of 2026

Smt. Neelu Devi w/o Satendra Singh(CFN missing)

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ashok Kumar , Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name will be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Ashok Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is virtually present and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. counsel for the respondents is physically present in Court.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. This O.A. has been filed for grant of Family Pension to the applicant on the pretext that the husband of the applicant is missing from 2018 and it is presumed that he is not alive.

5. On the other hand, Ld. Counsel for the respondents raised preliminary objection that till now no FIR has been lodged for missing of the Applicants’ husband and no decree of civil death has been filed, therefore no action arose to institute this petition. He seeks and allowed time to file objection against maintainability of the petition by next date fixed.

6. Member (A) Member (J) Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Suppl. No.3 )

Ex. A. No. 322 of 2026 Inre O.A. No. 720 of 2024

Smt. Kamlesh Devi w/o Late Nk Kiranpal Singh

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav and Sri Saurabh Yadav , Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Mrs. Kavita Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Mrs. Kavita Mishra, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. Her name will be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Sri Saurabh Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Mrs. Kavita Mishra, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present

3. This fresh execution application has been filed by the applicant for non- implementation of order dated 03.11.2025 passed by this Tribunal in O.A. No. 720 of 2024.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not aware that the order of this Bench has been challenged before the Hon’ble Apex Court or the Hon’ble High Court.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents is hereby directed to seek instructions and to file compliance affidavit before next date of listing otherwise suitable order has been passed.

6. Member (A) Member (J) Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No.1)

Ex.-A. No.65 of 2019 in re O.A. No. 253 of 2012

Ex Hav Krishna Kumar Thakur

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra and Maj Vinay Sharma, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri D.K. Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is physically present and Shri D.K. Pandey, Ld. counsel for the respondents is virtually present

2. It is informed by both the counsel that the matter is pending for disposal before the Hon’ble Apex Court and status report will be filed before the next date of listing.

3. Member (A) Member (J) Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex. A. No. 295 of 2024 in re O.A. No. 875 of 2021

Ex. Sub Maj (Hony Capt.) Sanjay Kumar Singh

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh , Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Sunil Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Veer Raghav Chaubey, Advocate holding brief of Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is physically present and Shri Sunil Sharma, Ld. counsel for the respondents is virtually present

2. Objection against compliance report filed by the proxy counsel is taken on record. He is directed to provide copy of the objection to the Ld. Counsel for the respondents/ OIC Legal Cell for go through the objection and file reply before the next date fixed.

3. Member (A) Member (J) Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 3)

Ex. A. No.197of 2026 Inre O.A. No. 953 of 2023

Wg Cdr Debendra Nath Chatterjee (Retd.)

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Maj. S.M. Mustafa (Retd.) , Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Dr. Chet Narayan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Maj. S.M. Mustafa (Retd.) Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Dr. Chet Narayan Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents are physically present

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the PPO has been issued on 16.10.2026 and compliance affidavit will be filed in Registry during course of the day, copy duly served upon Ld. Counsel for the applicant.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant seeks and allowed time to file objection, if any, against the compliance affidavit by next date fixed.

4. Member (A) Member (J) Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET

M.A. No. 918 of 2026 with M.A. No. 919 of 2026 Inre O.A. No. 1030 of 2024

Rohit Kumar S/o Late Sgt Nanhe Lal

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Virat Anand Singh , Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal , Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Virat Anand Singh ,Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present and Shri Amit Jaiswal ,Ld. counsel for the respondents is present M.A. No. 918 of 2026.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. This application has been filed for condonation of delay in filing recall application. There is delay of 10 months and 13 days in filing recall application.

4. Cause shown in affidavit filed alongwith delay condonation application being sufficient, delay in filing the recall application is condoned. M.A. aforesaid is disposed off. M.A. No. 919 of 2026.

5. This application has been filed for recall of order dated 03.09.2026 passed in O. A. No. 1030 of 2024.

6. Submission of Ld. Counsel for the applicant is that he could not attend the Court on 03.09.2026 due to personal reason. He further submits that in his absence the case was dismissed due to non-prosecution. He prays for recall of order dated 03.09.2026.

7. In the interest of justice, we decide the case on merits and his prayer is allowed, order dated 03.09.2026 is recalled, this case will be restored to its original number. Aforesaid M.A. stands disposed of.

8. Member (A) Member (J) Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 5 )

M.A. No. 1063 of 2026 Inre O.A. No. 549 of 2026

Hav Prabhat Nandan Jha (Retd.)

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rahul Pal & Shri Dhiraj Kumar, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri R.C. Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Rahul Pal ,Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri R.C. Shukla ,Ld. counsel for the respondents are virtually present M.A. No. 1063 of 2026.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. This application has been filed for recall of order dated 10.08.2026 passed in O. A. No. 549 of 2026.

4. Submission of ld. Counsel for the applicant is that due to illness he could not attend the Court on 10.08.2026 to press the petition and the petition was dismissed on admission stage due to non-prosecution. He prays for recall of order dated 10.08.2026.

5. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, order dated 10.08.2026 is recalled and this petition will be restored to its original number. Aforesaid M.A. stands disposed of.

6. Member (A) Member (J) Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 6)

O.A. No. 490 of 2024

Ex. Sub Guru Prasad Pandey

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Parijaat Belaura , Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey , Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Parijaat Belaura, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey ,Ld. counsel for the respondents are physically present

2. Heard Ld. Counsel for the parties with some extent.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant seeks and allowed four weeks time to file rejoinder affidavit.

4. Member (A) Member (J) Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 7)

O.A. No. 1137 of 2024

Ex. Sgt. Himangshu Gogoi

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri G.C. Tripathi & Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi , Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh , Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Krishna Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri G.C. Tripathi , Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh ,Ld. counsel for the respondents are physically present

2. Rejoinder affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant by proxy counsel, copy duly served upon Ld. Counsel for the respondents, is taken on record.

3. Now, pleadings are complete.

4. List on 27.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

Member (A) Member (J) Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 327 of 2025

Ex. Sep/MT Rajeev Kumar Rai`

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KKS Bisht , Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Yogesh Kesharwani , Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Yogesh Kesharwani , Ld. counsel for the respondents is present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the applicant moved an adjournment application stating their in that he could not be able to attend the Court due to illness.

3. In the interest of justice, the case is passed over for the day.

4. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

5. Member (A) Member (J) Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 492/2025

Hav Suyabhan (Retd.)

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Girish Chandra Tripathi Shri Indra Mani Tripathi Shri Sunil Kumar Mishra , Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Pushpendra Mishra , Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Krishan Kumar brief holder for Shri Girish Chandra Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Pushpendra Mishra , Ld. counsel for the respondents , both are present before the court.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. Today, on the date of last opportunity for filing reply, learned counsel for respondents has appeared and submitted that counter reply is in his hand and assures that the same will be filed in the registry during the course of day. In the circumstances, he is permitted to file the counter reply in the registry during the course of day, after giving copy of same to the learned counsel for applicant.

4. Learned counsel for applicant is directed to file rejoinder reply by the next date of listing. 5 List on 23.02.2027 for final hearing.

Member (A) Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 516/2025

Smt. Ganga Devi Tumbapo w/o L/Nk Dil Kumar Tumbapo Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Veer Raghav Chaubey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh , Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Veer Raghav Chaubey Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Today, learned counsel for applicant produced photo copy of death certificate in English language issued by Shiv Satakhi Municipality , Office of Ward No. 7, Koshi Pvocince, Nepal, which is taken on record. According to which, late husband of the applicant died on 28.08.2058 Bikram Sambat which will 13 December, 2001 according to Gregorian Calendar. Similar date of death has been mentioned in death certificate annexed at page 32 of the O.A. OIC (Legal) has also confirmed this date after confirming it from the internet. We are of the view that the order dated 10th August, 2026 passed by this Tribunal has been complied with. Counter affidavit filed by the learned counsel for respondents is taken on record.

4. Ld. Counsel for applicant is directed to file Rejoinder Reply by the next date.

5. List on 23.02.2027 for final hearing.

Member (A) Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 29/2026

Lt. Col Abhijeet Kumar

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal , Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Akhilesh Kumar Pandey brief holder for Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh ,Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Amit Jaiswal Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel seeks time to file counter Affidavit. Counter Affidavit may be filed within 15 days. Rejoinder Reply may be filed within a period of 15 days thereafter.

3. List on 23.02.2027 for final hearing

Member (A) Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 30/2026

Ex. Nb Sub Pradeep Kumar Singh

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav Shri Saurabh Yadav, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Yogesh Kesharwani, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Saurabh Yadav Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Yogesh Kesharwani, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents submitted that counter affidavit is ready and the same will be filed during the course of day in the registry. He is permitted to file counter affidavit after giving copy of the same to the ld. Counsel for applicant.

3. Ld. Counsel for applicant is directed to file Rejoinder Reply within 15 days.

4. List on 26.02.2027 for final hearing.

Member (A) Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 493/2026

Smt. Lalti Devi w/o Ex.Sgt. Late Harinath Prasad Dubey Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rang Nath Pandey Shri Rahul Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Rant Nath Pandey Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal Ld. counsel for the respondents , both are present through video conferencing. Sri Saket Srivastava, ld. Counsel for respondent No. 4 (Bank ) is present before the court and filed memo of appearance on behalf of the respondent No. 4, which is taken on record. Registry is directed to show the name of Sri Sanket Srivastava as counsel for respondent No. 4 in the future cause list.

2. Ld. Counsel for applicant has challenged the recovery of Rs. 46875.00 made by respondent No 3 from the pension slip of applicant from the month of April, 2025 and still being continued every month. By way of interim relief, ld. Counsel for the applicant prayed that the recovery may be stayed.

3. Ld. Counsel for applicant submitted that the recovery has been done without any notice or opportunity and in the light judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of State of Punjab and others Vs. Rafiq Masih etc. Reported in AIR 2015 Supreme Court 696, respondent cannot make any recovery of excess pension if any paid to the husband of the applicant from monthly pension.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, meanwhile the recovery from pension of the applicant is stayed.

5. Ld. Counsel for respondent is directed to file counter reply within one month.

6. Copy of order be provided to the ld. Counsel for respondents Dasti for compliance of the order.

7. Member (A) Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 14)

O.A. No. 517/2026

Shri Ex. Sub Patil Siddheshwar Uttam

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri K.P.Datta, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Devesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri K.P. Datta, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Devesh Kumar Mishra, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court

2. At the request of the ld. Counsel for respondents , case is adjourned. One month more time is granted to the ld. Counsel for respondents to file counter reply.

3. Member (A) Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 554/2026

Harbans Kaur w/o late M.E. (I) Harbans Singh

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri D.S. Tiwari, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri D.S. Tiwari, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court.

2. Heard the learned counsel for parties

3. O.A. is disposed of. Detailed order on separate sheet of paper.

(Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain) (Justice Umesh Chandra Sharma) Member (A) Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 16)

O.A. No. 756/2026

Ex. Hav Clk Hom Singh Yadav

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla , Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Kavita Mishra Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Kavita Mishra, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court.

2. Ld. Counsel for applicant has challenged the recovery of Rs. 1,35,470/- made by respondent from the pension slip of applicant w.e.f. June, 2026 and is being recovered Rs. 11,547/- every month. By way of interim relief, ld. Counsel for the applicant prayed that the recovery may be stayed.

3. Ld. Counsel for applicant submitted that the recovery has been done without any notice or opportunity and in the light judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of State of Punjab and others Vs. Rafiq Masih etc. Reported in AIR 2015 Supreme Court 696, respondent cannot make any recovery of excess pension if any paid to the applicant from monthly pension.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, meanwhile the recovery from pension of the applicant is stayed.

5. Ld. Counsel for respondent is directed to file counter reply within one month.

6. Copy of order be provided to the ld. Counsel for respondents Dasti for compliance of the order.

7. Member (A) Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 2/2017 along with O.A. No. 254/2016

Ex. Sub Maj Rashid Ali

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Namit Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Virat Anand Singh holding brief for Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present and seeks adjournment.

2. Shri Namit Sharma Ld. counsel for the respondents is physically present.

3. Member (A) Member (J)

GIRISH/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 289/2023

Ex. Nk Rajendra Chauhan

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Virat Anand Singh Shri Raj Kumar Tiwari Shri Rahul Dev Tripathi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Virat Anand Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has received telephonic conversation from MLI Office, Ahmed Nagar that his case is under process and if he withdraws the case, his grievance would be redressed. In the circumstances, the applicant wants to withdraw the O.A. with liberty to approach this Tribunal again, if any grievance subsists

3. In view of the above, the O.A. is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforementioned liberty.

Member (A) Member (J)

GIRISH/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 1528/2023

Mrs. Mansi Bisht w/o Col (Late ) Himanshu Bisht Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh Shri Shubham Singh , Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Apooli Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Apooli Srivastava, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. Judgment is reserved.

(Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain) (Justice Umesh Chandra Sharma) Member (A) Member (J)

GIRISH/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 284/2025

Sushila Dubey w/o late Sub Yadvendra Kumar

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh Shri S.K.Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri S.N. Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri S.N. Pandey Ld. counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. Judgment is reserved.

(Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain) (Justice Umesh Chandra Sharma) Member (A) Member (J)

GIRISH/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No.21)

O.A. No. 456/2025

Ris (ADT) Prabha Shankar Mishra (Retd.)

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Anjani Kumar Mishra Sri Diwakar Mishra and Srhi Jainendra Pandey , Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri J.N. Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Anjani Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri J.N. Mishra, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present and perused the records.

2. According to the applicant, he is not involved in any criminal case; whereas according to the respondents, CBI enquiry has been held in which the applicant is one of the accused and Vigilance Department of Indian Army has also recommended to take appropriate action against him and that is why the Gratuity of the applicant has been withheld till finalization of the proceedings. In the circumstances, the respondents are directed to inform this Court as to whether the CBI has finished its enquiry and has submitted chargesheet against the applicant or not. The report may be submitted before the next date.

3. Member (A) Member (J)

GIRISH/-