Armed Forces Tribunal
Daily order sheet, C1, 23 Oct 2026 on 23 October 2026
ORDER SHEET
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW
Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 1)
OA No. 981 of 2026 with MA No. 1190 of 2026
Ex Spr Hasib Ahmad Islam
Applicant
By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Mohd. Zafar Khan, Advocate
Versus
Union of India & Others
Respondents
By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry
1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.
2. On the case being taken up for hearing Mohd Zafar Khan, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.
3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.
4. There is delay of more than 30 years in filing this original application. Applicant has filed delay condonation application for condoning the delay.
5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents raised objection with regard to delay in filing of this O.A. He prays for and is granted four weeks time to seek instructions and to file objection, if any, to the delay condonation application.
RK/-
ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 2) OA No. 1014 of 2026
Sep Amit Kumar
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vaibhav Sangam Mishra, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Deepti Prasad Bajpai, Advocate Notes of the Registry
1. Memo of Appearance filed by Ms. Deepti Prasad Bajpai, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. Her name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.
2. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Ms. Deepti Prasad Bajpai, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.
RK/-
Page 1 of 30
ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 3)
Ex-A No. 313 of 2026 Inre OA No. 21 of 2024
Sgt Sunil Kumar Singh (Retd.)
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate
Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate
Ms. Upasana Mishra, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 2 of 30
1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.
2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.
3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.
4. This is a fresh execution application filed for implementation of order dated 24.10.2024 of this Tribunal passed in Original Application No. 21 of 2024.
5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks time to seek instructions and to file affidavit of compliance of the order of this Tribunal.
RK/-
Page 3 of 30
ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 4 )
Ex-A No. 314 of 2026 Inre OA No. 1146 of 2024
JWO Satendra Singh (Retd.)
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate
Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate
Ms. Upasana Mishra, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 4 of 30
1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.
2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.
3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.
4. This is a fresh execution application filed for implementation of order dated 10.04.2026 of this Tribunal passed in Original Application No. 1146 of 2024.
5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks time to seek instructions and to file affidavit of compliance of the order of this Tribunal.
RK/-
Page 5 of 30
ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 5 )
Ex-A No. 315 of 2026 Inre OA No. 1164 of 2024
Nk DSC (GD) Ayodhya Prasad Tiwari (Retd.)
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ram Saran Awasthi, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 6 of 30
1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Ram Saran Awasthi, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.
2. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri Ram Saran Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.
3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the respondents and perused the records.
4. This is a fresh execution application filed for implementation of order dated 25.09.2025 of this Tribunal passed in Original Application No. 1164 of 2024.
5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks time to seek instructions and to file affidavit of compliance of the order of this Tribunal.
RK/-
ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 6 )
TA No. 35 of 2026 with MA No. 1112 of 2026
Ex Rfn (MACP Hav) Beerendr Singh
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant :
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri JN Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 7 of 30
1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri JN Mishra, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.
2. On the case being taken up for hearing nobody appears for the applicant. Shri JN Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.
3. This application has been received by transfer from Principal Bench, New Delhi. Registry has already communicated to the applicant on his mobile phone but no one appeared on behalf of the applicant.
4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that he has no document pertaining to this case.
5. Counter affidavit is available on record.
RK/-
ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 7 )
TA No. 36 of 2026
Sgt Surendra Yadav (Retd.)
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 8 of 30
1. Memo of Appearance filed by Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.
2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.
3. Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the applicant which is taken on record. Registry is directed to show his name as counsel for the applicant in the future cause list.
4. Ld. Counsel appearing for the applicant submits that copy of the entire O.A alongwith counter affidavit has been provided to the respondents’ counsel. Pleadings in the matter have already been exchanged and matter may be listed for final hearing.
5. List for physical final hearing on 29.03.2027.
RK/-
ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 8 )
MA No. 1181 of 2026 Inre TA No. 32 of 2025
Nk/DSC GD Shailendra Kumar Singh (Retd.)
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri JN Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry
1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri JN Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.
2. There is an adjournment applicant on behalf of the applicant’s counsel.
3. Case is adjourned.
RK/-
ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 9 )
MA No. 1257 of 2026 Inre OA No. 1223 of 2024
Cpl Nabin Sahu, Lgs Asst.
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ram Pukar Singh, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 9 of 30
1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present.
2. This is an early hearing application filed on behalf of the applicant for early hearing of the case which is already fixed on 18.03.2027.
3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the respondents and perused the records.
4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents vehemently opposed this application and submitted that none is present on behalf of the applicant to press this application for early hearing and it may be rejected.
5. We find no occasion to prepone this matter for hearing. Put up this case on the date already fixed.
6. M.A No. 1257 of 2026 stands disposed of.
RK/-
ORDER SHEET
Ex-A No. 140 of 2022 Inre OA No. 420 of 2021
Ex Sub Rajiv Kumar
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ram Saran Awasthi, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 10 of 30
1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Akhilesh Kumar Pandey holding brief for Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ram Saran Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.
2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.
3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.
4. In this case, the O.A was decided on 09.12.2021. Five years have already passed, neither any writ petition is pending nor there is any operational stay order but order has been complied with.
5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents stated that he has no instruction in the matter.
6. In these circumstances, there is no other option, ADG-PS, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order of this Bench.
8. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.
9. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of ADG-PS.
RK/-
ORDER SHEET
Ex-A No. 239 of 2022 Inre OA No. 618 of 2021
Ex Hav Sanjai Yadav
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri VP Pandey, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Devesh Kumar, Advocate Notes of the Registry
1. Ld. Counsel for the parties are not present today.
2. This case is already listed on 27.10.2026, it has been wrongly listed today. Put up this case on the date fixed.
RK/-
ORDER SHEET
Ex-A No. 305 of 2024 Inre OA No. 1112 of 2022
MCERA II Rajeev Kumar Singh (Retd.)
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manish Kumar Rai, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Anju Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 11 of 30
1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Ms. Anju Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.
2. Status report filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.
3. Heard the ld. counsel for the respondents and perused the records.
4. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.
5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that GSL has been issued on 29.06.2026 and compliance is under process. She prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.
RK/-
ORDER SHEET
Ex-A No. 318 of 2024 Inre OA No. 758 of 2023
Ex Nk Mohan Singh
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Deepti P. Bajpai, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 12 of 30
1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Ms. Deepti P. Bajpai, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.
2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.
3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.
4. In this case, the O.A was decided on 02.12.2023. Two and half years have already passed and matter is also settled by the Hon’ble Apex Court but order has been complied with. Now there is no occasion to file any writ petition.
5. In these circumstances, there is no other option, ADG-PS, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order.
6. All the Cost deposited by the respondents shall be remitted to the applicant.
8. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.
9. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of ADG-PS.
RK/-
ORDER SHEET
Ex-A No. 319 of 2024 Inre OA No. 536 of 2023
Ex POWTR Sandeep Kumar
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Dhiraj Kumar, Advocate
Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 13 of 30
1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.
2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.
3. Compliance affidavit filed by the respondents is taken on record. By means of compliance affidavit it is submitted that order has been complied with. PPO has been issued on 22.10.2026.
4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant seeks short time to go through the compliance affidavit filed by the respondents. Time as prayed is allowed.
RK/-
ORDER SHEET
Ex-A No. 357 of 2024 Inre OA No. 805 of 2022
Ex Nk Rajesh Kumar
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 14 of 30
1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vinay Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present virtually.
2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with and payment has also been made to the applicant. No grievance is left.
3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant conceded the fact that order has been complied with.
4. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.
RK/-
ORDER SHEET
Ex-A No. 275 of 2025 Inre OA No. 407 of 2024
Sgt Gaurav Awasthi (Retd.)
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate
Shri Tatsat Shukla, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 15 of 30
1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.
2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.
3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.
4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that writ petition is proposed to be filed against the order of this Tribunal but till today neither any writ petition is filed nor there is any stay order.
5. In this case, the O.A was decided on 05.12.2024. Two years have already passed, neither any writ petition has been filed by the respondents nor order has been complied with.
6. In these circumstances, there is no other option, PD-DAV, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order of this Bench.
7. All the cost deposited by the respondents shall be remitted to the applicant.
9. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.
10. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of PD-DAV.
RK/-
ORDER SHEET
Ex-A No. 89 of 2026 Inre TA No. 09 of 2023
Ex Sgt Himanshu Mishra
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Dharam Raj Singh, Advocate
Shri Vishal Bhatnagar, Advocate
Shri Yashwin Singh, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Anju Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry
1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Ms. Anju Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.
2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that writ petition No. 7122 of 2025 filed against the order of this Tribunal is still pending.
RK/-
ORDER SHEET
Ex-A No. 112 of 2026 Inre OA No. 1244 of 2024
Ex Sgt Ravi Prakash Singh
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 16 of 30
1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.
2. Heard the ld. counsel for the respondents and perused the records.
3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.
4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that compliance is under process. He prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.
RK/-
ORDER SHEET
Ex-A No. 113 of 2026 Inre OA No. 639 of 2024
Sgt Awadhesh Kumar Mishra RTO (Retd.)
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Chet Narayan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 17 of 30
1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Chet Narayan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.
2. Ld. Counsel for the applicant filed copy of the order passed in W.P (A) No. 1290 of 2026 and submitted that the writ petition is duly dismissed on 24.07.2026.
3. Since the writ petition filed by the respondents is dismissed and the matter is also settled by the Hon’ble Apex Court, respondents are bound to obey the order of this Bench. One more chance is granted to the respondents to file compliance affidavit till the next date of listing otherwise coercive order shall be passed against the respondents.
RK/-
ORDER SHEET
Ex-A No. 114 of 2026 Inre OA No. 411 of 2023
Ex Nb Sub Bijaypal Singh
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Amit Asthana, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 18 of 30
1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Amit Asthana, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.
2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.
3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.
4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that writ petition filed by the respondents has already been dismissed on 26.05.2026. About five months have already passed but the compliance has not been done by the respondents.
5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time as one more chance to comply the order and file compliance affidavit till the next date of listing failing which respondents shall deposit cost of Rs. 10,000/- in the Registry which shall be remitted to the applicant.
RK/-
ORDER SHEET
OA No. 1009 of 2023
Ex Nb Sub Ram Kumar Singh
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Chet Narayan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry
1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Chet Narayan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.
2. Compliance affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the respondents is taken on record.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks and is allowed four weeks time to file rejoinder affidavit.
SB
ORDER SHEET
OA No. 895 of 2024
Ex JWO Dayanand Prasad
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Amit Pandey, Advocate
Shri Shiv Kant Pandey, Advocate
Ms. Nisha Pandey, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry
1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Shiv Kant Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant has already filed rejoinder affidavit which is taken on record.
3. Now pleadings are complete.
4. List for physical final hearing on 31.03.2027.
SB
ORDER SHEET
OA No. 213 of 2025
Hav/ Clk (SD) Parwinder Singh
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vivek Tripathi, Advocate
Ms. Vartika Pandey, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry
1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present.
2. Last opportunity of four weeks is granted to the applicant to file rejoinder affidavit.
SB
ORDER SHEET
OA No. 245 of 2025
Hav Dinesh Kumar (Retd.)
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Nidhikant Dhyani, Advocate
Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate
Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 19 of 30
1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that during the pendency of this Original Application, the applicant is reported to be no more, so he wants to move substitution application.
3. As prayed four weeks time is granted to the applicant to move substitution application.
SB
ORDER SHEET
OA No. 682 of 2025 with MA No. 808 of 2025
Ex Hav Surendra Kumar Upadhyay
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Girish Chandra Tripathi, Advocate
Shri Sunil Kumar Mishra, Advocate
Shri Indra Mani Tripathi, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry
1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Krishna Kumar Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Girish Chandra Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.
2. As prayed, last opportunity of four weeks is granted to the learned counsel for the respondents to file objection on maintainability of the case.
SB
ORDER SHEET
OA No. 690 of 2025
Bhola Prasad
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Arif Hussain, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 20 of 30
1. On the case being taken up for hearing none appeared on behalf of the applicant. Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present.
2. On the earlier occasions, learned counsel for the applicant was not present on 27.10.2025 and 27.02.2026.
3. Since none appeared on behalf of the applicant today and on previous occasions also, this Original Application is dismissed in default for non prosecution.
SB
ORDER SHEET
OA No. 793 of 2025
Hav (Gnr) Rana Sangram Singh (Retd.)
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Narayan Dutt Mishra, Advocate
Shri Amit Kumar Shukla, Advocate
Shri Madan Kumar Swarnkar, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 21 of 30
1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Narayan Dutt Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.
2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks further time to file counter affidavit.
4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.
5. List on 20.04.2027.
SB
ORDER SHEET
OA No. 1057 of 2025
Hav N Asst Kantreddi Ashok
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rang Nath Pandey, Advocate
Shri Rahul Pandey, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Namit Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 22 of 30
1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rang Nath Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court. Shri Namit Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present, however, Legal Representative is present.
2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.
3. One more opportunity of four weeks is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit, otherwise case shall be decided on its own merit.
4. List on 20.04.2027.
SB
ORDER SHEET
OA No. 1065 of 2025
Col Rajnish Sharma (Retd.)
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Prerna Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 23 of 30
1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Ms. Prerna Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.
2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that parawise comments have been received and counter affidavit is under preparation and seeks further time to file counter affidavit.
4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.
5. List on 20.04.2027.
SB
ORDER SHEET
Page 24 of 30
OA No. 1108 of 2025
TS Nk Ram Deo Yadav (Retd.)
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate
Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate
Ms. Upasana Mishra, Advocate
Shri Abhishek Pandey, Advocate
Shri Yogesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate
Shri Chandan Kumar Pandey, Advocate
Shri Dharmender Singh, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 25 of 30
1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.
2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that parawise comments have been received and counter affidavit is under preparation and seeks further time to file counter affidavit.
4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.
5. List on 20.04.2027.
SB
ORDER SHEET
Page 26 of 30
OA No. 1109 of 2025
Sgt Sushil Kumar Singh (Retd.)
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate
Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate
Ms. Upasana Mishra, Advocate
Shri Abhishek Pandey, Advocate
Shri Yogesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate
Shri Chandan Kumar Pandey, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 27 of 30
1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.
2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that parawise comments have been received and counter affidavit is under preparation and seeks further time to file counter affidavit.
4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.
5. List on 03.05.2027.
SB
ORDER SHEET
OA No. 112 of 2026 with MA No. 132 of 2026
Ex Nb Sub (Hon Sub) Chandra Prakash Attri
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri DS Tiwari, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry
1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri DS Tiwari, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.
2. Objection on delay condonation application filed by the respondents is taken on record.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant may file reply, if any, within four weeks.
SB
ORDER SHEET
OA No. 1376 of 2023
Ex Sep Hari Singh Ale
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Prakhar Kankan, Advocate
Shri KKS Bisht, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri GS Sikarwar, Advocate Notes of the Registry
1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is not present. Shri GS Sikarwar, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.
2. In the interest of justice, the case is adjourned for the day.
3. List for physical final hearing on 31.03.2027.
SB
ORDER SHEET
OA No. 741 of 2024
Ex MACP Nb Sub Bhupinder Singh
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, Advocate
Shri Abhishek Singh, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RC Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry
1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode. Shri RC Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present.
2. In this matter, GMO 2023 is challenged and matter is subjudice before the AFT (PB), New Delhi.
3. List for hearing on 26.05.2027.
SB
ORDER SHEET
OA No. 113 of 2025
Ex Sep (ACP-I) Habul Goroi
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Virat Anand Singh, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 28 of 30
1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Virat Anand Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, duly assisted by Lt Col Satendra Kumar, Legal Representative, are present.
2. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. Original Application is partly allowed.
4. Detailed order is placed on separate sheets.
5. Misc. Application(s), pending if any, shall stand disposed of.
SB
ORDER SHEET
OA No. 257 of 2025
Ex Rect Kamlesh Kumar
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry
1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.
2. Hard arguments of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. Judgment reserved.
SB
ORDER SHEET
OA No. 890 of 2025
Sub Bimal Kumar Singh (Retd.)
Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Amit Asthana, Advocate
Versus Union of India & Others
Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri GS Sikarwar, Advocate Notes of the Registry
Page 29 of 30
1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Amit Asthana, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri GS Sikarwar, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.
2. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. Original Application is allowed.
4. Detailed order is placed on separate sheets.
5. Misc. Application(s), pending if any, shall stand disposed of.
SB
Page 30 of 30
Loading citations and judicial treatment…