Daily order sheet, C2, 23 Oct 2026 on 23 October 2026

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Ms. Kavita Mishra, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. Her name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Rang Nath Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Kavita Mishra Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court.

2. This O.A. has been filed by the ld. Counsel for the applicant for change of name in the service record but the respondents counsel submitted that this Court has no territorial jurisdiction to entertain this O.A. as the applicant is the resident of Maharashtra and presently posted at Ahmedabad. Ld. Counsel for respondents is directed to file objection against maintainability of the O.A.

3. Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2(Suppl. No. 2)

O.A. No. 1058 of 2026 with M.A. No. 1264 of 2026

Smt Prem Lata widow of Late Hav Raju Ban

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Wg Cdr Ajit Kakkar and Shri Manoj Kumar

Awasthi, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Chet Narayan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Chet Narayan Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Chet Narayan Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

3. This O.A. has been filed by the ld. Counsel for applicant along with delay condonation application. Ld. Counsel for applicant submitted that due to ignorance of law and not having proper assistance, he could not file the present O.A. before this Tribunal. Cause shown is sufficient. Delay is condoned. M.A. No. 1264/2026 stands disposed off.

4. Ld. Counsel for applicant submitted that applicant is the widow of late Hav Raju Ban and she is getting family pension and she is seeking special family pension because the death of her husband took place during duty. Matter needs adjudication.

5. Admit.

6. Let Counter Affidavit may be filed within 04 weeks. Rejoinder Reply may be filed within 02 weeks thereafter.

Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2(Suppl. No. 3)

Ex-A. No. 346 of 2026 Inre: O.A. No. 1458 of 2023

Ex Hony Lt Vinod Kumar Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Shiv Kumar Saroj, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Apooli Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Ms. Apooli Srivastava, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. Her name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Shiv Kumar Saroj, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Apooli Srivastava-, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present through video conferencing..

3. This is the fresh execution application to execute the order dated 27.01.2026 passed in O.A. No. 1458/2023.

4. Ld. Counsel for respondents may file compliance affidavit.

5. Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2(Suppl. No. 4)

M.A No. 1265 of 2026 Inre: M.A. No. 519 of 2025 Inre: O.A. No. 198 of 2024

Vikas Kumar S/o Late Nb Sub

Applicant DSC Sumer Singh (Retd) By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Sri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court.

3. Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2(Suppl. No. 5)

M.A. No. 1271 of 2026 Inre: O.A. No. 1239 of 2024

Lt Col Pallavi Verma

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present

2. M.A. No. 1271/2026:

This is early hearing application filed by ld. Counsel for applicant. Ld. Counsel for applicant submitted that pleadings in this case are complete and the case is fixed for final hearing on 15.3.2027 and during the pendency of this O.A., applicant has came to know that Selection Board will tentatively held in October, 2026 for promotion to the rank of Col and electrostat copy of the letter is annexed along with early hearing application. In this circumstances, he requested that the matter may be pre-poned because the matter is most urgent, otherwise irreparable loss will be done to the applicant.

3. Legal representative seeks time to seek instruction about exact date of Selection Board from M.S. Legal.

4. Matter is preponed. M.A. No. 1271/2026 stands disposed off.

5. Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2(Suppl. No. 6)

M.A. No. 1272 of 2026 Inre: O.A. (A) No. 1169 of 2023

Ex Cpl Praveen Awasthi

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vatsaly Srivastava, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri, Vatsaly Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present through video conferencing.

2. M.A. No.1272/2026:

This is an early hearing application. Ld. Counsel for applicant submitted that the matter is most urgent and the case may be preponed but the ld. Counsel for respondents submitted that in this case the matter relates to District Court Martial which takes time. The case is already fixed on 9.4.2027. There is no occasion to prepone the case. Early hearing application is dismissed. M.A. No. 1272/2026 stands dismissed.

3. List on 09.04.2027, the date already fixed.

Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2(Suppl. No. 7)

M.A. No. 1274 of 2026 Inre: M.A. No. 1283 of 2026 Inre: T.A. No. 1065 of 2010

Ex JWO RN Mishra

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Ms. Nisha Pandey and Shri Shiv Kant Pandey,

Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Ms. Nisha Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. M.A. No. 1274/2026:

This is an early hearing application. It is submitted by the ld. Counsel for applicant that this early hearing application has been moved for correction of some typographical mistake. The case is already fixed on 13.11.2026. The cause shown is sufficient to prepone the case. Accordingly, case is preponed. M.A. No. 1274/2026 stands disposed off.

3. Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A No. 212 of 2023 Inre: O.A. No. 664 of 2022

Ex Hav Ram Prasad

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RKS Chauhan, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri RKS Chauhan, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents submitted that he has no instruction. Ld. Counsel for respondents is directed to obtain instruction.

3. Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A No. 53 of 2024 Inre: O.A. No. 462 of 2020

Smt. Birmati Devi W/o Inder Pal Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Veer Raghav Chaubey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Veer Raghav Chaubey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents submitted that he has filed compliance affidavit, which is taken on record.

3. By means of this compliance affidavit, learned counsel for respondents submitted that corrigendum PPO has been issued on 17.03.2026 and compliance has been done in letter and spirit.

4. Since the compliance of the order passed by this Bench has been done, the Execution Application No. 53/2024 is disposed off with full and final satisfaction.

Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A No. 322 of 2024 Inre: O.A. No. 33 of 2022

Ex Sub Asha Ram

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh Chauhan, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh Chauhan, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents submitted that compliance affidavit has been filed, which is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for applicant is hereby directed to file objection to the compliance affidavit, if any. Pending cost of Rs. 15,000/- be deposited by the next date.

4. Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A No. 256 of 2025 Inre: O.A. No. 991 of 2023

Ex Nk Birendra Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KKS Bisht, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, none present for the applicant Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A No. 283 of 2025 Inre: O.A. No. 574 of 2025

Mrs. Devaki Maya Gurung W/o Late Ex Rfn

Applicant Dhan Bahadur Gurung By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Col AK Srivastava (Retd), Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, none present on behalf of the applicant. Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present before the court

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents has filed compliane report and submitted that corrigendum PPO has been issued on 23.01.2026. Since the ld. Counsel for applicant is not present, matter is adjourned. Ld. Counsel for applicant is directed to file objection, if any to the compliance report.

3. Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 268 of 2025

Ex Nk Bishamber Dutt

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri VP Pandey & Shri RK Singh, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey and Mohd. Zafar

Khan, Advocates

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri VP Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court. Md. Zafar Khan, Ld. Counsel for Bank is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for applicant is not inclined to file Rejoinder Reply

3. List on 28.10.2026 for final physical hearing.

Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 482 of 2025

Smt. Prem Lata W/o (Late) Ex LS Chandra Pal Chauhan Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav and Shri Saurabh

Yadav, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Mrs. Amrita Chakraborty, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Saurabh Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Mrs. Amrita Chakraborty , Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court.

2. Now, pleadings in this case are complete. List the case for final physical hearing on 29.04.2027.

Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 582 of 2025

Hav / AA Chandra Shekhar Singh Yadav

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Dharam Raj Singh, Shri Vishal Bhatnagar

and Shri Ashish Asthana, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Dharam Raj Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents submitted that Counter Affidavit is ready and the same shall be filed during the course of day in the registry. Copy of Counter has already been handed over to ld. Counsel for applicant.

3. Ld. Counsel for applicant is directed to file Rejoinder reply.

4. Ld. Counsel for respondents submitted that due to typographical mistake, in para 2 of the order dated 23.7.2026, his name has wrongly be typed as Ashish Kumar Singh in place of Ashish Agnihotri and requested for correction of the same. Ld. Counsel for applicant has no objection. Accordingly, name of Sri Ashish Agnihotri is corrected in order dated 23.7.2026.

5. Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 873 of 2025

Smt. Sadhna Yadav W/o Late Nand Kishor Singh Applicant And Another By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shamshad Alam, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Shri Saurabh

Yadav, Shri Upmanyu Srivastava and Ms.

Supriya Srivastava, Advocates

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shamshad Alam, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. counsel for the respondents No. 1 to 5, Sri Upmantyu Srivastava and Sri Supriya Srivastava for respondents No 6, all are present before the court.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondent No. 6 submitted that he wants to file recall application of order dated 14.5.2026 as well as objection/ counter affidavit to the O.A.. He is directed to file recall application as well as objection before the registry after providing copy of the same to the ld. Counsel for applicant.

3. Ld. Counsel for applicant may file reply to the recall application and against the objection.

4. Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 1034 of 2025

Ex Hav Ran Bahadur Darlami

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri VP Pandey, Shri RK Singh and Shri Mridul

Pandey, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Somesh Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri VP Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Somesh Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submitted that counter affidavit is under preparation and seeks some more time to file the same. Time as prayed is allowed.

3. Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 151 of 2026

Smt. Gina Kumari Thapa Magar

Applicant W/o Rfn Late Dhan Bahadur Thapa By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri VP Pandey and Shri RK Singh, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri VP Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents has filed counter affidavit which is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for applicant seeks time to file Rejoinder reply.

4. Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 164 of 2026

Sub Mujawar Ayyaj Alamgir (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Amit Asthana, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri GS Sikarwar, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Amit Asthana, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri GS Sikarwar, Ld. counsel for the respondents,both are present through vide conferencing

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents submitted that corrigendum PPO has already been issued and grievance of the applicant has been redressed. Ld. Counsel for respondents is directed to file corrigendum PPO.

Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 222 of 2026

Smt. Abreesha Khatoon W/o Late

Applicant SPR Ajmer Ali By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey

and Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Umesh Bajpai brief holder for Sri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents submitted that counter affidavit has been filed, which is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for applicant seeks time to file rejoinder reply. Time as prayed is allowed.

4. Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 322 of 2026

Air Cmde Sameer Pradhan

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh and Shri Anurag Vikram,

Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Sunil Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court. None present on behalf of the respondents either physically or virtually.

2. Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 456 of 2026

Ex Revervist Ram Pal

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh and Shri Suresh

Chandra Pandey, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Vinay Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents No. 1 to 5, both are present before the court. None appeared on behalf of the bank i.e. respondents No. 6 and 7

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents No. 1 to 5 submitted that he had filed short counter affidavit on 14.7.2026 in the registry and now he wants to withdraw the same. He is permitted to do so. Registry is directed to handover the short counter affidavit to the ld. Counsel for respondents No. 1 to 5. Ld. Counsel for respondent No. 1 to 5 seeks time to file detailed counter affidavit.

3. Ld. Counsel for applicant submitted that vide order dated 29.7.2026, the recovery of the applicant has been stayed by this Bench and despite that State Bank of India has recovered the amount from the pension of the applicant. In this circumstances, State Bank of India, Shikohabad, District Firozabad has disobeyed the order passed by this Tribunal on 29.7.2026. Accordingly, Chief Manager, SBI, Shikohabad, District Firozabad is directed to present virtually before this bench to explain for non-compliance of the order of this Tribunal. Copy of order be given to the ld. Counsel for applicant.

4. Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 614 of 2026 with M.A. No. 753 of 2026

Ex Hav Sanjeev Kumar Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Shri Saurabh Yadav

and Shri Surendra Kumar, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Dr. Gyan Singh and Mohd. Zafar Khan,

Advocates

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Saurabh Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Dr. Gyan Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents (Union of India) both are present before the court. Md. Zafar Khan ld counsel for respondent No. 5 and 6 is present through video conferencing.

2. Today, ld. Counsel for respondent (Union of India) has filed objection on delay condonation application, which is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for applicant submitted that applicant was discharged on 27.02.2016 and he could not approach the authority because he was under impression that his pension has correctly been fixed by the respondents but in December, 2025, he came to know from ex-serviceman that he is getting less pension and benefit of 3rd MACP was not granted to him when he completed 24 years of service and submitted that in this regard he has submitted representation to the authority.

4. We are of the view that delay has property been explained by the ld. Counsel for applicant and delay is condoned.

5. Matter relates to pensionary benefit, which needs adjudication.

6. Admit.

7. Ld. Counsel for respondents is directed to file counter affidavit within 4 weeks. Rejoinder be filed within 02 weeks thereafter.

8. Member (A)

Member (J)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 17)

O.A. No. 432 of 2023

Ex ACP Nk Manvendra Singh

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KP Datta, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Dr. Chet Narayan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri KP Datta, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Dr. Chet Narayan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Arguments concluded.

4. Order reserved.

(Lt Gen Anil Puri) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta) Member (A) Member (J) rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 18)

O.A. (A) No. 87 of 2018

Yadav Ajay Kumar Banwari

Appellant

By Legal Practitioner for the Appellant : Maj RD Singh (Retd), Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present.

2. On request of learned counsel for the appellant, the case is passed over for the day.

3. List on 22.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

(Lt Gen Anil Puri) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta) Member (A) Member (J) rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 19)

O.A. (A) No. 159 of 2023

Nk (Dismissed) Bhanu Pratap Pandey

Appellant

By Legal Practitioner for the Appellant : Shri Parijaat Belaura, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Parijaat Belaura, Ld. Counsel for the appellant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. On request of learned counsel for the parties, the case is adjourned.

3. List on 23.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

4. On the next date fixed, the respondents shall produce original record pertaining to this case for perusal of the bench.

(Lt Gen Anil Puri) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta) Member (A) Member (J) rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 20)

O.A. (A) No. 1245 of 2023

Sep Raj Karan Singh (Dismissed)

Appellant

By Legal Practitioner for the Appellant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav and Shri Saurabh Yadav, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Namit Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Saurabh Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the appellant is present in Court and Shri Namit Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Rejoinder affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant is taken on record.

3. Pleadings are complete.

4. List on 28.10.2026 for physical final hearing.

(Lt Gen Anil Puri) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta) Member (A) Member (J) rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 21)

T.A. No. 22 of 2023

Smt Bala Devi W/o Ravindra Kumar

Petitioner

By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner : Ms Alka Saksena, Advocate

Versus Smt Monika Tyagi & Ors

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Shri VP Pandey and Ms Aarti Singh Pundir, Advocates Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Ms Alka Saksena, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, and Shri VP Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that she wishes to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh.

4. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty file afresh.

(Lt Gen Anil Puri) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta) Member (A) Member (J) rathore