Daily order sheet, C1, 22 Oct 2026 on 22 October 2026

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri GC Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing. M.A. No. 1179 of 2026

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is delay of 05 months and 28 days in filing of Original Application. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application. Cause of delay shown in the affidavit annexed with the delay condonation application are sufficient to condone the delay. Delay is condoned.

5. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 974 of 2026

6. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

7. Case needs adjudication.

8. Admit.

9. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

10. List on 20.04.2027.

(Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 2) OA No. 977 of 2026 with MA No. 1185 of 2026 Ex Sub Dilip Kumar Pandey

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate

Shri Saurabh Yadav, Advocate

Ms Alka Saksena, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing. M.A. No. 1185 of 2026

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is no delay in filing of this Original Application. However, Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application which is rejected as not required.

5. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 977 of 2026

6. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

7. Case needs adjudication.

8. Admit.

9. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

10. List on 20.04.2027.

(Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 3) OA No. 978 of 2026 with MA No. 1186 of 2026 Ex Sub Tapabrata Roy

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate

Shri Saurabh Yadav, Advocate

Ms Alka Saksena, Advocate

Shri Yashpal Singh Yadav, Advocate Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ramesh Chandra Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Ramesh Chandra Shukla, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Saurabh Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Ramesh Chandra Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing. M.A. No. 1186 of 2026

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is delay of 04 months and 12 days in filing of Original Application. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application. Cause of delay shown in the affidavit annexed with the delay condonation application are sufficient to condone the delay. Delay is condoned.

5. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 978 of 2026

6. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

7. Case needs adjudication.

8. Admit.

9. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

10. List on 20.04.2027.

(Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 4) OA No. 979 of 2026 with MA No. 1188 of 2026 Col Sunil Sachan (Retd.)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate

Shri Saurabh Yadav, Advocate

Ms Alka Saksena, Advocate

Shri Yashpal Singh Yadav, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Saurabh Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present. M.A. No. 1188 of 2026

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is delay of 01 year and 26 days in filing of Original Application. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application. Cause of delay shown in the affidavit annexed with the delay condonation application are sufficient to condone the delay. Delay is condoned.

5. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 979 of 2026

6. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

7. Case needs adjudication.

8. Admit.

9. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

10. List on 20.04.2027.

(Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 5) OA No. 980 of 2026 with MA No. 1189 of 2026 HFO Abhijit Chatterjee (Retd.)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Shri Abhishek Pandey, Advocate

Shri Chandan Kumar Pandey, Advocate

Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocte

Rama Singh, Advocate Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present virtually. M.A. No. 1189 of 2026

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is delay of 10 months and 29 days in filing of Original Application. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application. Cause of delay shown in the affidavit annexed with the delay condonation application are sufficient to condone the delay. Delay is condoned.

5. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 980 of 2026

6. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

7. Case needs adjudication.

8. Admit.

9. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

10. List on 20.04.2027.

(Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 6) OA No. 1036 of 2026 with MA No. 1245 of 2026 Ex MCPO COM (EW) Sub Lt. Lokesh Kumar Sisodia (Retd.)

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ajay Pratap Singh, Advocate Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri GS Sikarwar, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri GS Sikarwar, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ajay Pratap Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri GS Sikarwar, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing. M.A. No. 1245 of 2026

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is delay of 01 year 05 months and 05 days in filing of Original Application. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application. Cause of delay shown in the affidavit annexed with the delay condonation application are sufficient to condone the delay. Delay is condoned.

5. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 1036 of 2026

6. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

7. Case needs adjudication.

8. Admit.

9. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

10. List on 20.04.2027.

(Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 7) Ex-A No. 312 of 2026 inre OA No. 21 of 2023

Ex Sub Dubey Achay Radheshyam

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Ms Upasana Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ram Saran Awasthi, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Ram Saran Awasthi, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Shri Ram Saran Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. This is a fresh execution application filed for implementation of order dated 13.04.2023 of this Tribunal passed in Original Application No. 21 of 2023.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks time to seek instructions and to file affidavit of compliance of the order of this Tribunal.

6. Registry is directed to show the name of all the counsels as mentioned in the Vakalatnama.

7. List on 11.05.2027.

(Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 8) MA No. 1187 of 2026 Inre Ex-A No. 203 of 2025 Inre OA No. 696 of 2017

Ex Nk Chhun Bahadur

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri VP Pandey, Advocate

Shri SK Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri VP Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. This is an early hearing application filed on behalf of the applicant for early listing of Execution application fixed on 15.03.2027.

3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. We find no occasion to prepone this matter for hearing on the execution application. Put up this case on the date already fixed.

5. M.A No. 1187 of 2026 stands disposed of.

6. List on 15.03.2027.

(Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 253 of 2023 Inre O.A. No. 63 of 2022 alongwith RA No. 16 of 2026

Lt Col Rajeev Devgan (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri SG Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri JN Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Anand Yadav holding brief for Shri SG Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Shri JN Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

2. In this case, a review application has been filed on behalf of Union of India.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondent (Applicant in the O.A) seeks some more time to file objection to the review application. Time as prayed is allowed.

4. List on 07.05.2027.

RK

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Sl. No.2)

Ex-A. No. 203 of 2024 Inre: OA. No. 389 of 2021 Ex Gnr Kaleshwar Sah

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ashok Kumar, Advocate

Shri Rohit Kumar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rohit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. In this case, the O.A was decided on 06.11.2023. About three years have already passed but order has not been complied with. Cost has also been imposed on several occasions. Cost of Rs. 5,000/- was imposed on 02.12.2024, Rs. 10,000/- on 19.03.2025, again Rs. 10,000/- on 12.08.2025, Rs, 15,000/- on 10.12.2025 and lastly cost of Rs. 20,000/- was imposed on 24.04.2026 against the respondents but till date neither writ petition has been filed nor any SLP is pending against the order of this Bench. Several opportunities have already been given.

5. In these circumstances, there is no other option, ADG-PS, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order of this Bench.

6. List on 07.05.2027.

7. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

8. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of ADG-PS.

RK

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 219 of 2024 Inre: OA. No. 776 of 2023

Ex Sub Ram Naresh Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocate Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that writ petition (A) No. 817 of 2025 filed by the respondents is duly dismissed on 20.08.2026 and in pursuance of order of this Bench, applicant has already filed his undertaking for provisional compliance.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that he has no instructions in the matter.

6. In these circumstances, there is no other option, ADG-PS, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order.

7. List on 07.05.2027.

8. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

9. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of ADG-PS.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 282 of 2024 Inre: OA. No. 512 of 2023

Ex Sub/Gnr Surendra Kumar Dubey

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Chet Narayan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Chet Narayan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. In pursuance of order dated 23.04.2026, Officiating OIC Legal Cell, Arty Records, Maj Raj Kumar is also present physically before this Bench and stated that he has already communicated to the concerned authority and submits that some more time may be given for compliance.

5. In this case, the O.A was decided on 25.09.2023. Writ petition which was filed by the respondents has been dismissed on 23.09.2026.

6. In these circumstances, there is no other option, ADG-PS, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order.

7. List on 07.05.2027.

8. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

9. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of ADG-PS.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 298 of 2024 Inre: OA. No. 712 of 2023

Ex Nb Sub Anil Singh Kushwaha

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ashok Kumar, Advocate

Shri Rohit Kumar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rohit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present virtually.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that writ petition which was filed against the order of this Bench is duly dismissed by the Hon’ble High Court in September 2026 and now the compliance is under process. He prays for and is granted some more time to file compliance affidavit.

3. List on 07.05.2027.

RK

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 347 of 2024 Inre: OA. No. 727 of 2023

Saroj Singh, W/o Late MWO Gulab Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rama Kant, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rama Kant, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court. Shri Rajesh Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present today. Departmental Representative is present for the respondents.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the applicant and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that writ petition which is filed by the respondents is duly dismissed on 24.07.2026 but order has not been complied with.

5. In these circumstances, there is no other option, PD-DAV, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order dated 12.01.2024.

6. List on 07.05.2027.

7. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

8. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of PD-DAV.

RK

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 95 of 2025 with MA No. 581 of 2026 Inre: OA. No. 903 of 2023

Ex Hav Niranjan Pawar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Preeti Mala, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court. Ms. Preeti Mala. Counsel for the respondents is not present today. Departmental Representative is present for the respondents.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the applicant and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed an affidavit by means of which it is submitted that writ petition filed by the respondents is duly dismissed on 20.05.2026. Now five months have been passed but compliance has not been done. Matter is also settled by the Hon’ble Apex Court. Respondents are bound to comply the order in letter and spirit.

5. In these circumstances, there is no other option, ADG-PS, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order.

6. List on 07.05.2027.

7. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

8. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of ADG-PS.

RK

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 259 of 2025 Inre: OA. No. 197 of 2023

Ex Hav Jeeva Lal Bhandari

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri VP Pandey, Advocate

Shri RK Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri VP Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. In pursuance of order dated 23.04.2026, Lt. Col Vinod Kumar, OIC Records, 39 GTC is also present virtually and submits that matter is pending at Army HQ.

5. In this case, the O.A was decided on 27.04.2023. Three years have already passed, but order has not been complied with.

6. In these circumstances, there is no other option, ADG-PS, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order dated 04.08.2023.

7. Cost of Rs. 30,000/- has already been imposed. Respondents are also directed to deposit all the cost due against them by the next date of listing.

8. List on 07.05.2027.

9. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

10. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of ADG-PS.

RK

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 276 of 2025 Inre: OA. No. 456 of 2024

Ex Sub Sushil Kumar Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Dhiraj Kumar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Dhiraj Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. In this case, the O.A was decided on 21.01.2025. More than one and half year has already passed but order has not been complied with.

5. In these circumstances, there is no other option, ADG-PS, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order.

6. Cost deposited by the respondents shall be remitted to the applicant.

7. List on 10.05.2027.

8. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

9. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of ADG-PS.

RK

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 277 of 2025 Inre: OA. No. 1283 of 2023

Ex Sgt Bhasker Dubey

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate

Shri Tatsat Shukla, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Dhiraj Kumar holding brief for Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court. Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Ld. Counsel for respondents is not present today. Departmental Representative is present for the respondents.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the applicant and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. In this case, the O.A was decided on 05.12.2024. About two years have already passed but order has not been complied with.

5. In these circumstances, there is no other option, PD-DAV, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order.

6. Respondents are also directed to deposit all the cost due against them by the next date of listing.

7. List on 10.05.2027.

8. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

9. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of PD-DAV.

RK

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 382 of 2025 Inre: OA. No. 1143 of 2023

Sub Parhlad Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri RC Jain, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri RC Jain, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Status report filed on behalf of the applicant is taken on record.

5. Matter has already been settled by the Hon’ble Apex Court. Respondents are legally bound to comply the order in letter and spirit.

6. In this case, the O.A was decided on 01.08.2024. Two years have already passed but order has not been complied with.

7. In these circumstances, there is no other option, ADG-PS, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order.

8. List on 10.05.2027.

9. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

10. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of ADG-PS.

RK

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 383 of 2025 Inre: OA. No. 934 of 2023

Ex Nk (MACP) Hav Anil Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kripa Shankar, Advocate

Shri Ashok Kumar Chauhan, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kripa Shankar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that Writ Petition filed assailing the order of this Tribunal before the Hon’ble High Court has been duly dismissed on 25.05.2026.

4. Since more than five months have already been passed after dismissal of the Writ Petition by the Hon’ble High Court but compliance has not been done by the respondents. In the circumstances, ADG PS, IHQ of MoD (Army) to appear before the court through virtual mode on the next date fixed to explain the reason for non implementation of the order of this Tribunal.

5. List on 10.05.2027.

6. Copy of the order be provided to the learned counsel for the respondents/Legal Representative for necessary compliance.

SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex. A. No. 422 of 2025 Inre OA No. 742 of 2021

Ex Nb Sub Rajendra

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Ms. Shakshi Verma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Anju Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Ms. Shakshi Verma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Anju Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that there is no instruction regarding implementation of the order of this Bench dated 03.03.2022.

4. More than four years have already passed after dismissal of the Writ Petition by the Hon’ble High Court but compliance has not been done by the respondents.

5. Cost imposed on the respondents has also not been deposited by the respondents.

6. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents on payment of additional cost of Rs. 10,000/- to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

7. On the next date fixed, ADG PS, IHQ of MoD (Army) to appear before the court through virtual mode to explain the reason for non implementation of the order of this Tribunal.

8. List on 10.05.2027.

9. Copy of the order be provided to the learned counsel for the respondents/Legal Representative for necessary compliance.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1086 of 2025 Hav Jadav Mahendra Gajendra

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate Shri Ajit Kakkar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant has already filed rejoinder affidavit which is taken on record.

3. Pleadings are complete.

4. List for final hearing on 03.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1087 of 2025

Sgt (MACP) Prabir Hazra (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Advocate

Shri Ram Jivan Dixit, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Anju Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Ms. Shailja Rastogi, Advocate holding brief of Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Anju Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Counter affidavit filed by the respondents and rejoinder affidavit filed by the applicant are taken on record.

3. Now pleadings are complete.

4. Applicant is hereby directed to provide copy of the rejoinder affidavit to the learned counsel for the respondents within a week.

5. List for physical final hearing on 03.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No.1088 of 2025

MWO (HFO) Ashok Kumar Bajpai (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Advocate Shri Ram Jivan Dixit, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Advocate on behalf of the applicant is taken on record. Registry is directed to show name of Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi as counsel for the applicant in future cause list.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Ms. Shailja Rastogi, Advocate holding brief of Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

5. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

6. List on 04.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1097 of 2025

Sgt Ritik Roshan (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Tatsat Shukla, Advocate Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate Shri Dhiraj Kumar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Dhiraj Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, through virtual mode, are present.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. List on 04.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1098 of 2025

Ex Nk (MACP Hav) Rajender Singh Karki

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Kavita Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Vakalatnama filed by Ms. Shailja Rastogi and Shri Prakhar Kankan, Advocate on behalf of the applicant is taken on record. Registry is directed to show their names as counsel for the applicant alongwith Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla in future cause list.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Ms. Shailja Rastogi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that counter affidavit is ready and he will file counter affidavit in the registry during the course of day.

4. Applicant may file rejoinder affidavit, if any, within four weeks.

5. List on 04.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1102 of 2025

WO Om Prakash (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocate Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Abhisehk Pandey, Advocate Shri Yogesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Chandan Kumar Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Chet Narayan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Chet Narayan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that counter affidavit is ready and he will file counter affidavit in the registry during the course of day.

3. Applicant may file rejoinder affidavit, if any, within four weeks.

4. List on 04.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 255 of 2026 with MA No. 308 of 2026

Ex Sep/Clk Hari Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ankur Rawat, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the being taken up for hearing Shri Ankur Rawat, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. Time was granted to the applicant to file reply to the objection on delay condonation application as well as on maintainability filed by the respondents, which has not been filed.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks and is allowed four weeks further time to file reply to the objection.

4. List on 20.01.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 296 of 2026 with MA No. 357 of 2026

Sub Maj Shital Singh Rathore (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Girish Chandra Tripathi, Advocate

Shri Sunil Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Shri Krishan Kumar Singh, Advocate

Shri Indra Mani Tripathi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Girish Chandra Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Objection on delay condonation application filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks and is allowed four weeks time to file reply to the objection, if any.

4. List on 31.03.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 299 of 2026 with MA No. 360 of 2026

Ex Nk Sanjay Kumar Yadav

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate Shri Anshuman Srivastava, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. Since M.A. No. 360/2026 has already been disposed of, Registry is directed not to show M.A. No. 360/2026 in future cause list.

6. List on 05.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 551 of 2024

Sgt Umesh Kumar Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Tatsat Shukla, Advocate

Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate Shri Dhiraj Kumar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Dhiraj Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the parties.

3. Respondents are directed to bring on record whether the applicant in low medical category A4G4 was employed in driver duty. Respondents are further directed to provide charter of duties of the applicant on the next date fixed and to clarify the various duties performed by the applicant during low medical category.

4. List for hearing on 24.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 991 of 2024 Brig Ravinder Srivastava (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri BL Verma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri BL Verma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Original Application is dismissed.

4. Detailed order is placed on separate sheets.

5. Misc. Application(s), pending if any, shall stand disposed of.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 181 of 2025 Brig Som Nath Rai (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri BL Verma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri BL Verma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Original Application is dismissed.

4. Detailed order is placed on separate sheets.

5. Misc. Application(s), pending if any, shall stand disposed of.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 623 of 2025

Ex Nk Hari Shanker Tiwari

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Virat Anand Singh, Advocate Shri Narendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Virat Anand Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Original Application is allowed.

4. Detailed order is placed on separate sheets.

5. Misc. Application(s), pending if any, shall stand disposed of.

SB

ORDER SHEET

TA No. 6 of 2024

JWO Surendra Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate Shri Dhiraj Kumar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Dhiraj Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Judgment reserved.

SB