Daily order sheet, C2, 22 Oct 2026 on 22 October 2026

1. Memo of appearance filed by Sri Amit Jaiswal on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. Registry is directed to show the name of Sri Amit Jaiswal as counsel for respondents in future cause list.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Veer Raghav Chaubey Counsel for the applicant is present is present before the court and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

3. M.A. No. 1252/2026: This instant O.A. has been filed by the learned counsel for applicant along with M.A. No. 1252/2026 for condonation of delay. The cause shown is sufficient. Delay is hereby condoned. M.A. No. 1252/2026 stands disposed off.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is legally wedded wife of Nk. Shailendra Kumar Pal but due to family dispute, the part II order is not yet to be commenced. Matter Needs adjudication.

5. Admit.

6. Learned counsel for respondents is directed to file Counter Affidavit within 4 weeks. Rejoinder Reply may be filed within 02 weeks thereafter.

7. Issue notice to respondent No. 8. Learned counsel is directed to take steps within 07 days.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2 (Suppl. No. 2 )

OA No.1053/2026

Nk Sarvesh Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Nishendra Kumar Pandey

Shri Harishankar Yadav, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Sunil Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of appearance filed by Sri Sunil Sharma on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. Registry is directed to show the name of Sri Sunil Sharma as counsel for respondents in future cause list.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Nishendra Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Sunil Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

3. This O.A. has been filed for cancellation of part II order, which needs adjudication.

4. Admit.

5. Learned counsel for respondents is directed to file counter affidavit within 04 weeks. Rejoinder Reply may be filed within 02 weeks thereafter.

6. Applicant has not made party to the private respondent in this O.A. He is directed to make party to the private respondent in this O.A.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2 (Supple. No. 3 )

OA No.1055/2026

L/Nk Anoj Pal

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ashok Kumar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajiv Narayan Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of appearance filed by Sri Rajiv Narayan Pandey on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. Registry is directed to show the name of Sri Rajiv Narayan Pandey as counsel for respondents in future cause list.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Ashok Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Rajiv Narayan Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is also present before the court.

3. The present O.A. has been filed by the learned counsel for applicant for cancellation of part II order and ld. Counsel for applicant submitted that Ms. Pratiksh is not legally wedded wife of L/Nk Anoj Pal and by fraud , the name of Ms. Pratiksha is mentioned in the service record. Matter needs adjudication.

4. Admit.

5. Ld. Counsel for respondents is directed to file counter affidavit within 04 weeks. Rejoinder Affidavit may be filed within 02 weeks thereafter.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2 (Supple. No.4 )

Ex. A/319/2026 in re OA No.809/2024

Ex. Nk Khun Khun Prasad

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R.Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of appearance filed by Dr. Shaildendra Sharma Atal on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. Registry is directed to show the name of Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal as counsel for respondents in future cause list.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri R. Chandra, Ld Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal , Ld. Counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court.

3. This is a fresh execution application to execute the order dated 21.05.2026 passed in O.A. No. 809/2024. Learned counsel for respondents is directed to file compliance affidavit.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2 (Suppl. No. 5 )

Ex. A/320/2026 in re OA No.619/2023

Ex. Hav Sarjeet Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Wg.Cdr. Ajit Kakkar Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Wg. Cdr. Ajit Kakkar. Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. This is a fresh execution application to execute the order dated 01.05.2025 passed in O.A. No. 619/2023. Ld. Counsel for respondents is directed to file compliance affidavit.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2 (Suppl. No. 6 )

M.A. No. 1270/2026 in re T.A. No.8/2026

Co. Vikrant Tyagi SM

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : In Person

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Col. Vikrant Tyagi applicant present in person through video conferencing and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court

2. M.A. No. 1270/2026: Applicant present in person has filed this M.A. for preponing the date of the case and submitted that in this matter, Counter and Rejoinder have already been exchanged. It is further submitted that the matter pertains to consideration of Annual Confidential Report. In the interest of justice, matter is preponed. M.A. No. 1270/2026 stands disposed off.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2 (Sl. No.1 )

Ex. A/366/2023 in re OA No. 334/2022

Ex.Nb Sub (TA) Shyam Ram

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Wg. Cdr. S.N. Dwivedi (Retd), Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Wg. Cdr. S.N. Dwivedi (Retd), Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. Vide order dated 9th July, 2026, Respondents were directed to file personal affidavit from ADG TA mentioning therein present status of the case by the next date fixed but today affidavit has not been filed. ADG (TA) appeared through video conferencing and submitted that some more time may be given to file personal affidavit. So in this circumstances, it is directed to the respondents to file original compliance order.

3. Counsel for applicant is directed to file personal undertaking of applicant to this effect that if any adverse order is passed by the Hon’ble High Court, then applicant shall be liable to repay the money.

4. Ld. Counsel for respondents is directed to provisionally comply the order

6. Copy of this order be given to the learned counsel for respondents.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2 (Sl. No.2 )

Ex. A/151/2025 in re OA No. 1023/2023

Smt. Heera Devi @ Heera Singh (Childless) w/o Late Sep Ashok Kumar Singh)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri, Parijaat Belaura, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Sunil Sharma , Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Wg. Cdr. S.N. Dwivedi holding brief of Shri Parijaat Belaura Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Sunil Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, both are present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for applicant submitted that objection to the compliance report has already been filed, which is taken on record. By means of this objection, learned counsel for applicant submitted that interest part is yet to be paid to the applicant.

3. Ld. Counsel for respondents is directed to file reply to this objection.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2 (Sl. No.3)

Ex. A/249/2025 in re OA No. 583/2023

Ex. Nk Tej Bahadur Thapa

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing. Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, is present before the court.

2. Status report filed by the learned counsel for respondents is taken on record and respondents counsel seeks adjournment.

3. Since the matter has already been settled by the Hon’ble Apex Court, so there is no other option left to the respondents to comply with the order. Respondents is hereby directed to comply with the order in letter and spirit. Several dates have already been given to the respondents. Rs. 10,000/- cost is imposed to the respondents for delay tactics adopted by the respondents in complying the order.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2 (Sl. No.4 )

Ex-A/155/2026 in OA No. 461/2024

JWO Chandan Kumar Mishra (Retd.)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Upasana Mishra

Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Sri Abhishek

Pandey, Ms.Tanya Singh,

Sri Chandan Kumar Pandey, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Gyan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing. None present for the respondents.

2. Legal representative submitted that corrigendum PPO has already been issued on 28.04.2026 and payment has been made. Ld. Counsel for respondents is directed to file compliance report. Ld. Counsel for applicant is directed to file objection, if any against the compliance report.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2 (Sl. No.5 )

OA No. 1002/2023

Smt. Manju Belwal w/o late Maj J. Belwar (Retd).& Ors

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Parijaat Belaura, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal , Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Raj Kumar Mishra holding brief of Shri Parijaat Belaura, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, both are present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents submitted that Counter Affidavit will be filed during the course of day in the registry.

3. Ld. Counsel for applicant may file Rejoinder Reply.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2 (Sl. No.6 )

OA No.1162/2024

Smt. Malti Singh w/o late CPL Bal Ram Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Akhilesh Pratap Singh Shri Kuhagra Kanodia, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Akhilesh Pratap Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Counter and Rejoinder have already been exchanged. Pleadings are complete.

3. List on 27.11.2026 for final physical hearing.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2 (Sl. No.7 )

OA No. 201/2025

Ex. Hav Ram Kishore

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh , Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Vinay Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents , both are present before the court.

2. Counter Affidavit has already been filed by the learned counsel for the respondents which is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for applicant may file Rejoinder reply.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2 (Sl. No.8 )

OA No. 300/2025

Ex. Sub (Hony Capt) Vinod Kumar & Others

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh Sri Ajay Sheoran, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Sunil Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh , Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Sunil Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for applicant is not inclined to file Rejoinder reply.

3. List on 18.12.2026 for final physical hearing.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2 (Sl. No.9)

OA No. 370/2025

Ex. Hav Sukhwinder Kumar (Retd.)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Narayan Dutt Mishra Shri Madan Kumar Swarnkar Sri Amit Kumar Shukla Mrs. Upasana Mishra, Sri Raj Kumar Mishra Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri R.C. Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Narayan Dutt Mishra,Shri Madan Kumar SwarnkarSri Amit Kumar Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the applicant are present before the court and Shri R.C. Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for applicant has already filed Rejoinder reply which is taken on record.

3. Now pleadings are complete.

4. List on 29.04.2027 for final physical hearing.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2 (Sl. No.10 )

OA No. 942/2025

CPL Sandeep Kumar Tripathi (Retd.)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri S.N. Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav brief holder of Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri S.N. Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents submitted that till today, parawise comments has not been received from the respondents and seeks some more time to file counter affidavit. Time as prayed is allowed.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2 (Sl. No.11)

OA No. 1015/2025

Col. Rajesh Tandon (Retd.)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Kavita Mishra , Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Vinay Pandey , Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Kavita Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents submitted that till today, parawise comments has not been received from the respondents and seeks some more time to file Counter Affidavit. This case was admitted on 27.11.2025. Last opportunity is given to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2 (Sl. No.12)

OA No. 1031/2025

Nk Vijay Shankar Singh (Retd.)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Dheeraj Kumar Mishra brief holder of Sri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents seeks some more time to file counter Affidavit. Time as prayed is allowed.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2 (Sl. No.13 )

OA No. 1106/2025

Smt. Aneeta Devi widow of Ex. Hav. Vijay Pal Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav Shri Saurabh Yadav Sri Surendra Kumar, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Bipin Kumar Singh , Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld.Counsel for respondents submitted that Counter Affidavit is ready and the same shall be filed with the registry during the course of day. Copy of Counter has duly been handed over to ld. Counsel for applicant.

3. Ld. Counsel for applicant is not inclined to file Rejoinder Reply and he is ready to argue the matter.

4. Heard arguments of both the ld. Counsel for parties.

5. Detailed order on separate sheet of paper.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2 (Sl. No.14 )

OA No. 251/2026

Nk./Clk (SD) Achhaiber Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Amit Pandey,Sri Shiv Kant Pandey Ms. Nisha Pandey, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms Appoli Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Ms. Nisha Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms Appoli Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents , both are present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents submitted that Counter Affidavit is under preparation and seeks some more time to file counter. Time as prayed is allowed.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 2 (Sl. No.15)

OA No. 422/2026 with M.A. No. 511/2026

Ex. Hony Nb Sub Ram Bahadur Rana

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Maj S.M. Mustafa (Retd.), Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Maj. S.M. Mustafa (Retd.), Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Bipin Kumar Singh , Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. On behalf of the respondents, objection on delay condontion application has been filed and on behalf of the applicant, reply to the objection has been filed. Both are taken on record.

3. On the point of maintainability, ld. Counsel for respondents raised objection that the applicant is resident of Nepal and this Bench of AFT has no territorial jurisdiction to entertain this O.A.

4. Ld. Counsel for applicant submitted that although the applicant is resident of Nepal but the nearest Railway station of the applicant is Gorakhpur and this court has jurisdiction to entertain the O.A.

5. After hearing the arguments of both the parties, we are of the view that this bench have territorial jurisdiction to entertain this O.A.

6. As far as delay is concerned, Ld. Counsel for applicant has properly explained the delay in filing the O.A. Accordingly, Delay is condoned. M.A. No. 511/2026 stands disposed off.

7. Matter pertains to entry in service record, which needs adjudication.

8. Admit.

9. Ld. Counsel for respondents is directed to file counter affidavit within 04 weeks. Rejoinder reply may be filed within 02 weeks thereafter.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 16)

O.A. (A) No. 611 of 2026 with M.A. No. 1081 of 2026

Hav Hari Om Sharan Chauhan (through father Shri Parashuram Chauhan, Pairokar)

Appellant

By Legal Practitioner for the Appellant : Shri Virat Anand Singh, Shri RK Singh and Ms Pallavi Borgohain, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms Appoli Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Lt Gen Anil Puri, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Virat Anand Singh, Ld. Counsel for the appellant is present in Court and Ms Appoli Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Objection against maintainability of this O.A. (A) filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks time to file reply, which is allowed.

4. List on 17.12.2026.

(Lt Gen Anil Puri) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 17)

O.A. No. 265 of 2021 with M.A. No. 247 of 2022

Sep Deepak Singh Chouhan

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Shiva Nand Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Lt Gen Anil Puri, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Shiva Nand Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present in Court.

2. Heard Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Today, this case is listed for physical final hearing, but learned counsel for the applicant is not physically present.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents has already filed objection to application filed u/s 340 CrPC on behalf of the applicant, which is taken on record.

5. Ld. Counsel for the applicant seeks time to file reply to objection filed on behalf of the respondents.

6. List on 30.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

7. On the next date fixed, original record shall be produced by the respondents for perusal of the bench.

(Lt Gen Anil Puri) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 18)

O.A. No. 317 of 2021

Ex Rect Prashant Kumar Prikshit

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi and Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Lt Gen Anil Puri, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard Ld. Counsel for the parties at length and perused the record.

3. Arguments concluded.

4. Order reserved.

(Lt Gen Anil Puri) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta) Member (A) Member (J) rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 19)

O.A. No. 1449 of 2023

Munna @ Radhey Shyam

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ashok Kumar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Lt Gen Anil Puri, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Ashok Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Arguments concluded.

4. Order reserved.

(Lt Gen Anil Puri) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta) Member (A) Member (J) rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 20)

O.A. No. 600 of 2024

Sep Dhanjay Kumar

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Virat Anand Singh, Shri Narendra Kumar Mishra and Shri RK Nigam, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Lt Gen Anil Puri, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Virat Anand Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Due to paucity of time, the case is passed over for the day.

3. List on 22.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

(Lt Gen Anil Puri) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta) Member (A) Member (J) rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 21)

O.A. No. 978 of 2024

Ex Sigmn Jagdish Singh

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ashok Kumar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Lt Gen Anil Puri, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Ashok Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the respondents has placed reliance on order dated 02.01.2024 passed by Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in writ petition No. 29399 of 2023, Ex Nk Surya Bhan Prasad vs Union of India & Ors.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks time to file case law in support of his contention, which is allowed.

5. List on 09.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

(Lt Gen Anil Puri) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

rathore