Daily order sheet, C1, 15 Oct 2026 on 15 October 2026

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present. M.A. No. 1174 of 2026

3. There is delay of 02 years, 06 months and 09 days in filing Original Application. Delay condonation application has been filed by the applicant.

4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that delay caused in filing of Original Application is not deliberate, but on account of reasons given in affidavit filed in support of application.

5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6. We are of the view that ground of delay mentioned in affidavit annexed with delay condonation application is sufficient. Delay condonation application is allowed and delay in filing application is condoned. Delay condonation application stands disposed of. O.A. No. 970 of 2026

7. This Original Application has been filed for grant of disability element.

8. Matter needs adjudication.

9. Admit.

10. Learned counsel for the respondents is granted four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

11. SB

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 2) OA No. 971 of 2026 with MA No. 1175 of 2026

Hav (MACP Nb Sub) Pawan Kumar (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KP Datta, Advocate Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri KP Datta, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode. M.A. No. 1175 of 2026

3. There is delay of 01 month and 06 days in filing Original Application. Delay condonation application has been filed by the applicant.

4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that delay caused in filing of Original Application is not deliberate, but on account of reasons given in affidavit filed in support of application.

5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6. We are of the view that ground of delay mentioned in affidavit annexed with delay condonation application is sufficient. Delay condonation application is allowed and delay in filing application is condoned. Delay condonation application stands disposed of. O.A. No. 971 of 2026

7. This Original Application has been filed for grant of disability element. In this case GMO 2023 is challenged and similar matter is pending before the AFT, Principal Bench.

8. Matter needs adjudication.

9. Admit.

10. Learned counsel for the respondents is granted four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

11. SB

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 3)

OA No. 972 of 2026 with MA No. 1176 of 2026 Hav (MACP Nb Sub) Satish Kumar (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KP Datta, Advocate Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri KP Datta, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present. M.A. No. 1176 of 2026

3. There is delay of 01 month and 06 days in filing Original Application. Delay condonation application has been filed by the applicant.

4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that delay caused in filing of Original Application is not deliberate, but on account of reasons given in affidavit filed in support of application.

5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6. We are of the view that ground of delay mentioned in affidavit annexed with delay condonation application is sufficient. Delay condonation application is allowed and delay in filing application is condoned. Delay condonation application stands disposed of. O.A. No. 972 of 2026

7. This Original Application has been filed for grant of disability element. In this case GMO 2023 is challenged and similar matter is pending before the AFT, Principal Bench.

8. Matter needs adjudication.

9. Admit.

10. Learned counsel for the respondents is granted four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

11. SB

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 4)

OA No. 973 of 2026 with MA No. 1177 of 2026

Ex Sep Avdhesh Kumar Srivastava

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate Shri Umesh Chandra Bajpai, Advocate Shri Anuj Sharma, Advocate Shri Anupam Srivastava, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

3. There is delay of 36 years, 01 month and 13 days in filing Original Application. Delay condonation application has been filed by the applicant.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents raised objection on delay condonation application and submitted that there is long delay of more than 36 years in filing this Original Application. He prays for and is granted four weeks time to seek instruction and file objection on delay condonation application.

5. SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 196 of 2022 Inre: TA No. 16 of 2016 Ex Rect Ashutosh Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri JN Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none appeared on behalf of the applicant. Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. Several opportunities have been given to the learned counsel for the applicant to file objection to compliance affidavit which has not been filed.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant was not present on 24.04.2026 also and last opportunity was granted to the applicant to file objection on compliance affidavit.

4. It appears that learned counsel for the applicant is not interested to pursue the case further.

5. Thus, this Execution Application appears to be infructuous and is dismissed as infructuous.

SB

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Sl. No.2)

Ex-A. No. 21 of 2023 Inre: OA No.843 of 2021 Dfr Munesh Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Nand Kishore, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Preeti Mala, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none appeared on behalf of the applicant. Ms. Preeti Mala, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present, however Legal Representative is present for the respondents.

2. Previously, learned counsel for the applicant was not present on 22.04.2024, 30.07.2024, 24.07.2025, 18.11.2025 and 24.04.2026.

3. In the circumstances, the case stands disposed of.

SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 36 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 209 of 2022

Ex Hav Mudit Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Parijaat Belaura, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Parijaat Belaura, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Compliance affidavit filed by the respondents is taken on record.

4. By means of compliance affidavit, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that GSL has already been issued on 11.08.2026.

5. PCDA representative submitted that Corrigendum PPO has been issued on 29.09.2026 and amount will be credited in the applicant’s account till end of October 2027.

6. Learned counsel for the applicant may file objection, if any, till next date of listing.

7. SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 162 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 693 of 2022

Ex Hav (SHT) Ashok Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri VP Pandey, Advocate Shri DK Dixit, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Anurag Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri VP Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Anurag Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Compliance affidavit filed by the respondents is taken on record. Copy of compliance affidavit is duly received by the learned counsel for the applicant.

3. By means of compliance affidavit, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that Corrigendum PPO has been issued on 03.07.2026 and compliance has been done.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant may file objection, if any, till next date of listing.

5. SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 192 of 2023 with MA No. 1108 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 938 of 2022

Ex Hav Ravindra Kumar Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that Writ Petition which was filed by the respondents before the Hon’ble High Court has been dismissed vide order dated 08.07.2026.

3. So, in the circumstances, there is no other option but the respondents to comply the order in letter and spirit and file compliance affidavit, otherwise, coercive action shall be taken against the responsible officer.

4. As prayed, four weeks time is granted, as last chance, to the respondents to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

5. SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 295 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 931 of 2022

Ex Hav Prem Prakash

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Vishwesh Kumar, Advocate Shri RC Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri RC Shukla Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that Writ Petition No. 738/2025 was filed by the respondents before the Hon’ble High Court in which matter is stayed.

3. Since the matter is stayed before the Hon’ble High Court and operative stay order exists, list this case on 06.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 400 of 2023 Inre: OA No 1045 of 2022 Col. Arun C Karadi (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Prerna Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Prerna Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

2. Compliance affidavit filed by the respondents is taken on record. Copy of compliance affidavit is duly received by the learned counsel for the applicant.

3. By means of compliance affidavit, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that Corrigendum PPO has been issued on 19.05.2026 and compliance has been done.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant conceded the fact.

5. Since the order has been complied with, this execution application is disposed of in full satisfaction.

SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 401 of 2023 Inre: OA 19 of 2023

Ex SWR (ACP-Hav) Sanjay Kumar Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. Compliance affidavit filed by the respondents is taken on record.

3. By means of compliance affidavit, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that Corrigendum PPO has been issued on 17.07.2026 and compliance has been done.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant conceded the fact.

5. Since the order has been complied with, this execution application is disposed of in full satisfaction.

SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 238 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 1107 of 2022

Ex POEL (P) Ajay Singh Chauhan

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Advocate Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode and Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. Today, this case was fixed for filing of compliance affidavit b the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that he has no written instruction. However, by means of soft copy, he submitted that cost of Rs. 30,000/- has already been deposited on 09.10.2026.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks some more time to file compliance affidavit.

4. Perusal of order sheets reveals that several opportunities have already been given to the respondents to file status report of the case which has not been filed.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents further submitted that Writ Petition is proposed in this matter but Writ Petition has not been filed.

6. This order was passed on 05.07.2023 and more than three years have already been passed and cost of Rs. 48,000/- has been imposed on the respondents.

7. Due to lackadaisical approach on the part of the respondents, there is no other option but PDA (Navy) to appear before this court through virtual mode to explain the reasons for non compliance of the order of this Tribunal on the next date fixed.

8. If the compliance is done till next date of listing, then there is no need to appear PDA (Navy) on the next date fixed.

9.

10. Copy of order be provided to learned counsel for the respondents/Legal representative for necessary compliance.

SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 381 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 228 of 2023

Ex Sub Shaik Meera

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KKS Bisht, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that in pursuance to order of this Tribunal, undertaking has already been received from the applicant and GSL is awaited.

3. In this case, three years have already been passed but compliance has not been done, so in the circumstance there is no other option but Director PS-4, IHQ of MoD (Army) to appear before the court through virtual mode to explain the reasons for non compliance of the order of this Tribunal on the next date of listing.

4.

5. Copy of order be provided to learned counsel for the respondents/Legal Representative for necessary compliance.

6. In between, if the compliance is done, then Director PS-4 need not to be appeared on the next date fixed.

SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 82 of 2025 Inre: TA No. 26 of 2022

Sqn Ldr Saurav Jagnani (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri JL Joel, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Sunil Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri JL Joel, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode. Shri Sunil Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present, however, Legal Representative is present.

2. Legal Representative submitted that GSL has already been issued on 06.08.2026 and compliance of the order is under process.

3. Legal Representative seeks one more opportunity to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file compliance affidavit. If they fail to do so, then on the next date fixed, responsible officer from JCDA, Air Force, New Delhi shall be present before the court through virtual mode to explain the reasons for non compliance of the order of this Tribunal.

5. SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 86 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 61 of 2023

HFO Jagdish Prasad Sharma (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Chaturbhuj Dwivedi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Chaturbhuj Dwivedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. In pursuance to the order dated 22.04.2026, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that undertaking has already been given to the respondents on 09.05.2026. More than five months have passed but neither compliance has been done nor any instruction received on behalf of the respondents.

3. So, in the circumstances, there is no other option but DAV Air Force to appear before the court through virtual mode to explain the reasons for non compliance of the order.

4.

5. Copy of order be provided to learned counsel for the respondents/Legal representative for necessary compliance.

6. In between, if compliance is done then there is no need to appear DAV Air Force on the next date fixed.

SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 97 of 2025 Inre; OA No. 1123 of 2022

Ex HFO Vijay Shanker Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Status report filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. By means of status report, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that Writ Petition No. 11772/2025 is pending before the Hon’ble High Court in which notice has been issued to the applicant.

4. In pursuance to earlier order no undertaking is given by the applicant to the respondents. Applicant is directed to furnish his undertaking to the respondents by the next date fixed.

5. SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 120 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 1237 of 2024

Sub Indrajit Kumar Giri (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KKS Bisht, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri DK Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none appeared on behalf of the applicant. Shri DK Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present.

2. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted four weeks further time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

4. SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 500 of 2023

Ex HFO Kamal Chandra Das

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Shiv Kant Pandey, Advocate

Ms. Nisha Pandey, Advocate Shri Amit Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Amit Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

2. It is submitted on behalf of the parties that similar matter is subjudice before the Larger Bench.

3. SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 605 of 2025 Ex Dfr Rakesh Kumar Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KP Datta, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RKS Chauhan, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri KP Datta, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri RKS Chauhan, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. In this case GMO 2023 has been challenged.

3. Pleadings are complete.

4. List for hearing on 28.05.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 606 of 2025

Ex Sep Hariveer Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri GS Sikarwar, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri GS Sikarwar, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Counter affidavit filed by the respondents is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted four weeks time to file rejoinder affidavit.

4. List this case on 12.04.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1059 of 2025 Ex JWO Ram Naresh Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Amit Pandey, Advocate Shri Shiv Kant Pandey, Advocate Ms. Nisha Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Amit Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant has already filed rejoinder affidavit which is taken on record.

3. Now pleadings are complete.

4. List for physical final hearing on 13.04.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1060 of 2025

Ex Hav Ajit Kumar Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KP Datta, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Deepti Prasad Bajpai, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri KP Datta, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Deepti Prasad Bajpai, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that parawise comments have been received and seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1061 of 2025

MWO Ashok Kumar Mishra (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Markandey Tiwari, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Kavita Mishra , Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Markandey Tiwari, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Ms. Kavita Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that counter affidavit is under preparation and seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1069 of 2025

Ex L Hav Shiv Kumar Chaudhary

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KK Misra, Advocate

Versus Chief of Army Staff & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1071 of 2025

Sep Ravindra Kumar (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ajay Pratap Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ajay Pratap Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that parawise comments are still awaited and seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1080 of 2025 with MA No. 1230 of 2025

MWO (HFO) Lal Singh Bhadauria (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Advocate

Shri Ram Jivan Dixit, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the applicant which is taken on record. His name shall be shown as counsel for the applicant in future cause list.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that this Original Application is not maintainable because the grievance raised by the applicant is duly redressed by means of Corrigendum PPO but learned counsel for the applicant submitted that interest part is remaining to be paid to the applicant. M.A. No. 1230 of 2025

4. There is delay of 01 year, 03 months and 29 days in filing Original Application. Delay condonation application has been filed by the applicant.

5. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that delay caused in filing of Original Application is not deliberate, but on account of reasons given in affidavit filed in support of application.

6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

7. We are of the view that ground of delay mentioned in affidavit annexed with delay condonation application is sufficient. Delay condonation application is allowed and delay in filing application is condoned. Delay condonation application stands disposed of. O.A. No. 1080 of 2025

8. This Original Application has been filed for grant of disability element.

9. Matter needs adjudication.

10. Admit.

11. Learned counsel for the respondents is granted four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

12.

13. Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Advocate submitted that Shri Ram Jivan Dixit is no more counsel for the applicant in this case. Registry is directed to show name of Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi alongwith Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla as counsel for the applicant in future cause list and delete name of Shri Ram Jivan Dixit from the cause list.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 105 of 2026

Ex Sub Manoj Kumar Sharma

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rohitash Kumar Sharma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rohitash Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he is not inclined to file rejoinder affidavit.

4. List this case for physical final hearing on 13.04.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 684 of 2017 Col. Mukul Singhal

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Mohan Kumar, Advocate

Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Chet Narayan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Chet Narayan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A) has recused himself from hearing of this case.

3. So, list this case before the Bench comprising myself (Member J) and Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain (Member (A) for hearing on 11.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 162 of 2023

Col (TS) Vinay Kumar Dixit (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manish Kumar Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manish Kumar Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. In pursuance to the order dated 15.09.2025, learned counsel for the respondents filed some medical documents through affidavit which is taken on record, however, weight chart of the applicant, as directed by this court, has not been filed.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks further time, as last chance, to file weight chart of the applicant from the year 2016 to 2022.

4. List for hearing on 12.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 02 of 2024

Sgt Amit Kumar (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. Injury report filed by the learned counsel for the respondents is taken on record.

4. After hearing arguments of learned counsel for the parties, learned counsel for the applicant seeks time to file related documents of the case.

5. As prayed, two weeks time is granted to the learned counsel for the applicant to file documents.

6. List for hearing on 12.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 396 of 2024

Sub Maj Rajendera Kumar (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Satya Narayan Mishra, Advocate Shri Onkar Singh, Advocate Shri Pradeep Kumar Shukla, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Amrita Chakraborty, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Satya Narayan Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Amrita Chakraborty, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Original Application is partly allowed.

4. Detailed order is placed on separate sheets.

5. Misc. Application(s), pending if any, shall stand disposed of.

SB