Daily order sheet, C1, 14 Oct 2026 on 14 October 2026

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents in future cause list.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present. Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present, however, Legal Representative is present.

3. There is delay of more than 15 years in filing Original Application. Delay condonation application has been filed by the applicant.

4. Legal Representative apprised the court that impugned order is not challenged in the prayer clause and further submitted that there is inordinate delay of more than 15 years in filing this Original Application.

5. Respondents are hereby directed to file objection against maintainability as well as on delay condonation application till next date of listing.

6. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that he wants to file amendment application. As prayed, two weeks time is granted to the learned counsel for the applicant to file amendment application.

7. (Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta) Member (A) Member (J) SB

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 2)

OA No. 967 of 2026 with MA No. 1168 of 2026 Sub Vinod Kumar (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Satya Narayan Mishra, Advocate

Shri Pradeep Kumar Shukla, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents :Ms. Anju Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Ms. Anju Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. Her name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Satya Narayan Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Ms. Anju Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode. M.A. No. 1168 of 2026

3. There is delay of 07 months and 22 days in filing Original Application. Delay condonation application has been filed by the applicant.

4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that delay caused in filing of Original Application is not deliberate, but on account of reasons given in affidavit filed in support of application.

5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6. We are of the view that ground of delay mentioned in affidavit annexed with delay condonation application is sufficient. Delay condonation application is allowed and delay in filing application is condoned. Delay condonation application stands disposed of. O.A. No. 967 of 2026

7. This Original Application has been filed for grant of disability element.

8. Matter needs adjudication.

9. Admit.

10. Learned counsel for the respondents is granted four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

11. SB

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 3) OA No. 968 of 2026 with MA No. 1169 of 2026 Hav Romesh Sharma (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Satya Narayan Mishra, Advocate

Shri Pradeep Kumar Shukla, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Somesh Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Somesh Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Satya Narayan Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Somesh Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode. M.A. No. 1169 of 2026

3. There is delay of 07 months and 22 days in filing Original Application. Delay condonation application has been filed by the applicant.

4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that delay caused in filing of Original Application is not deliberate, but on account of reasons given in affidavit filed in support of application.

5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6. We are of the view that ground of delay mentioned in affidavit annexed with delay condonation application is sufficient. Delay condonation application is allowed and delay in filing application is condoned. Delay condonation application stands disposed of. O.A. No. 968 of 2026

7. This Original Application has been filed for grant of disability element.

8. Matter needs adjudication.

9. Admit.

10. Learned counsel for the respondents is granted four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

11. SB

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 4)

Ex-A. No. 310 of 2026 Inre; OA No. 547 of 2024

Rect (Gnr) Sandeep Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Arvind Kumar Jauhari, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Arvind Kumar Jauhari, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

3. This is fresh execution application filed by the applicant for implementation of order dated 07.01.2026 passed in OA No. 547 of 2024.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted four weeks time to seek instruction and file compliance affidavit.

6. SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 163 of 2024 Inre: OA. No. 516 of 2022 Ex JWO Bagish Kumar Bajpai

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri VP Pandey, Advocate Shri DK Dixit, Advocate Shri RK Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri VP Pandey and Shri RK Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant are present before the court. Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present, however, Legal Representative Flt Lt Gokul K is present.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Sqn Ldr AK Nautiyal from DAV appeared through virtual mode and submitted that order of the Tribunal dated 11.07.2023 is being complied and it is under process. He seeks and is allowed four weeks further time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

5. SB

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Sl. No.2)

Ex-A. No. 251 of 2024 Inre: OA. No. 546 of 2023 Ex WO Murari Kumar Nayak

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant filed copy of order dated 15.07.2026 passed by the Hon’ble High Court in Writ Petition No. 3857/2025 which is taken on record.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that although Writ Petition has been filed assailing the order of this Tribunal before the Hon’ble High Court but the same has been dismissed on 15.07.2026. He further submitted that respondents are ready to comply the order and seeks some more time.

5. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to comply the order and file compliance affidavit. If compliance is not done within the given time, coercive action shall be passed against the responsible officer.

6. SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 07 of 2025 Inre: OA. No. 1133 of 2022

Ex WO Vivek Vardhan Dubey

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate Shri Shashi Kant Chaturvedi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Chet Narayan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Shashi Kant Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode and Shri Chet Narayan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that Writ Petition filed by the respondents is duly dismissed by the Hon’ble High Court on 22.07.2026.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that in compliance of the order of this Tribunal, GSL has been issued on 11.08.2026 and the compliance is under process.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents is hereby directed to file compliance affidavit till next date of listing.

5. SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 12 of 2025 Inre: OA. No. 945 of 2023

Ex Sgt Sushil Kumar Shukla

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Keshav Sharma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri GS Sikarwar, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Keshav Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri GS Sikarwar, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that partial compliance has been done, i.e. only RSMB has been done but remaining part of the order has not been complied with by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks further time to comply the order.

4. Cost of Rs. 10,000/- already deposited by the respondents be released in favour of the applicant.

5. SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 109 of 2025 Inre: OA. No. 987 of 2023

Col. (TS) Ajit Kumar Malik (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that he has no instruction.

3. On perusal of order, it revealed that order was passed on 05.11.2024 and about two years have already passed but neither any Writ Petition has been filed by the respondents nor compliance has been done. So, in the circumstances, there is no other option but ADG PS, IHQ of MoD (Army) to appear before the court through virtual mode on next date of listing to explain the reasons for non compliance of the order.

4. In this case, cost of Rs. 25,000/- has already been imposed on the respondents, so, on next date of listing, if compliance is not done, coercive action shall be taken against the responsible officer.

5. Cost of Rs. 10,000/- has already been deposited by the respondents, the same be released in favour of the applicant.

6.

7. Copy of order be provided to learned counsel for the respondents/Legal representative for necessary compliance.

SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 110 of 2025 Inre: OA. No. 1519 of 2023

Ex Sub (Hony Sub Maj) Mansing Jaysingh Tondale Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that Writ Petition No. 5349/2026 filed assailing the order of this Tribunal before the Hon’ble High Court has been dismissed on 22.05.2026.

4. Since the Writ Petition was dismissed on 22.05.2026 and more than five months have already passed but the compliance has not been done.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted four weeks further time, on payment of cost of Rs. 10,000/-, to file compliance affidavit.

6. SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 113 of 2025 Inre: OA. No. 910 of 2022 MWO Brijesh Kumar Parihar (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocate Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Anju Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Anju Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that Writ Petition filed by the respondents assailing the order of this Tribunal before the Hon’ble High Court but there is not operative stay order and more than three months have already passed but the compliance has not been done.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that Writ Petition is still pending.

5. So, in these circumstances, respondents are directed to make compliance of the order provisionally subject to final outcome of the Writ Petition filed before the Hon’ble High Court after obtaining undertaking on affidavit from the applicant to effect that in case any adverse order is passed against him, he would return all the amount, if any, and comply with the order of the Hon’ble High Court in Writ Petition.

6. Applicant is hereby directed to submit undertaking to the respondents within 15 days.

7. As prayed by the learned counsel for the respondents four weeks further time is granted to comply the order provisionally and file provisional compliance affidavit.

8.

9. Copy of order be provided to the respondents/Legal Representative for necessary compliance.

10. Cost deposited by the respondents shall be remitted to the applicant.

SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 114 of 2025 Inre: OA. No. 448 of 2022

HFO Jagdish Singh Chauhan (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rang Nath Pandey, Advocate

Shri Rahul Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rang Nath Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that undertaking has already been received and the compliance is under process and requested for some more time to comply the order.

3. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to comply the order and file compliance affidavit. If compliance is not done within the given time, coercive action shall be passed against the responsible officer.

4. Respondents are directed to deposit all the cost due against them in the Registry till next date fixed.

5. SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 109 of 2026 Inre: OA. No. 370 of 2021

Smt Sushila Tripathi W/o Ex Cpl Ramdhan Tripathi Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Anju Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Anju Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Since there is no Writ Petition, filed by the respondents against the order of this Tribunal, so there is no other option but to comply the order of this Tribunal.

3. Respondents are hereby directed to comply the order in letter and spirit till next date of listing, failing which cost of Rs. 10,000/- to be deposited by the respondents in the Registry which shall be released in favour of the applicant.

4. SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 110 of 2026 Inre: OA. No. 1104 of 2023

Ex Hav Vimal Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Deepti Prasad Bajpai, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present but Ms. Deepti Prasad Bajpai, Ld. Counsel for respondents is not present, however, Legal Representative is present.

2. Legal Representative submitted that earlier instruction was to file Writ Petition which has not yet been filed.

3. Legal Representative seeks some more time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to file compliance affidavit.

4. SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 111 of 2026 Inre: TA. No. 09 of 2024

Kamlesh widow of Ex Sigmn Omkar Singh Dhaka Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rama Kant, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents in future cause list.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ram Kant, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks further time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

4. SB

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 119 of 2026 Inre: OA. No. 950 of 2025

Ex Hav Raheesh Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ashok Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Anurag Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ashok Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Anurag Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that order has been complied with.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant also conceded that compliance has been done.

4. Accordingly, this Execution Application is disposed of in full satisfaction.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 392 of 2025

Nk Patil Nitin Kishor (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Deepti Prasad Bajpai, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present. Ms. Deepti Prasad Bajpai, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present, however, Legal representative is present.

2. Neither learned counsel for the respondents is present nor counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents.

3. Last opportunity of four weeks is given to the respondents to file counter affidavit otherwise opportunity to file counter affidavit shall stand closed.

4. SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 524 of 2025 Ex Hav Virendra Kumar Yadav

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate Shri Saurabh Yadav, Advocate

Shri Surendra Kumar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Sunil Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Saurabh Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court. Shri Sunil Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present, however, Legal representative is present.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that grievance raised by the applicant in the Original Application is duly redressed by the respondents.

3. With the aforesaid submission by the learned counsel for the applicant, Original Application is dismissed as infructuous.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 597 of 2025

Sgt Jackson Justin (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks and is allowed four weeks further time to file rejoinder affidavit.

3. SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No.765 of 2025 JWO Badri Vishal (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Advocate Shri Ram Jivan Dixit, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Prerna Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Prerna Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 895 of 2025

WO Nagendra Kumar (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocate Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Abhishek Pandey, Advocate Shri Yogesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Chandan Kumar Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents, through virtual mode, are present.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 948 of 2025 Ex Nk Arjun Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri SN Dwivedi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri SN Dwivedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal and Mohd Zafar Khan, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that prayer (a) is duly redressed by the respondents but prayer (b) & (c) are still pending.

3. Since the grievances raised by the applicant are not fully redressed, the respondents are hereby directed to file counter affidavit till next date of listing.

4. SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1052 of 2025 with MA No. 1199 of 2025

Ex Cfn Pawan Kumar Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ashok Kumar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Prerna Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ashok Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Prerna Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. M.A. No. 1199 of 2025

3. There is no delay in filing Original Application. However, delay condonation application has been filed which being not required is rejected. Delay condonation application stands disposed of. O.A. No. 1052 of 2025

4. This Original Application has been filed for grant of disability pension.

5. Matter needs adjudication.

6. Admit.

7. Learned counsel for the respondents is granted four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

8. SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 295 of 2026

Ex Sub (Clk) Vikas Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi , Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Preeti Mala, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Ms. Preeti Mala, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. Her name be shown as Counsel for the respondents in future cause list.

2. On the being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Preeti Mala, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that parawise comments have been received and counter affidavit is under preparation and seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

5. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

6. SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 316 of 2026

Ex Hav Abhay Raj Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that parawise comments have been received and seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 319 of 2026

Sub Maj Devi Dayal Panday (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Satya Narayan Mishra, Advocate Shri Pradeep Shukla, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Satya Narayan Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that parawise comments have been received and seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 921 of 2026 with MA No. 1101 of 2026

Sqn Ldr Arvind Kumar Dixit (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Virat Anand Singh, Advocate

Shri Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advocate Ms. Pallavi Borgohain, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Ms. Pallavi Borgohain Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties on amendment application and perused the record.

3. By means of this amendment application, applicant wants to incorporate present address as well as permanent address as, “R/o Bharat Bhushan Colony, Gola, Gokarnath Urban, PO- Gola Gokarnath, District – Kheri (UP)- 262802, presently residing at 595/1A Yashodapuram, Janakipuram-I, Madiyavan Gaon Road, Lucknow-226021” and also wants to amend memo of parties No. 3 & 4 in the Original Application.

4. We are of the view that proposed amendment will not change the nature of the case.

5. Accordingly, amendment application is allowed. The applicant is directed to carry out amendment in the Original Application within two weeks and copy of amended O.A. to be provided to the learned counsel for the respondents.

6. Learned counsel for the respondents wants to file objection on maintainability of the Original Application. As prayed, two weeks time is granted to the respondents to file objection.

7. SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1224 of 2023 Ex Rect Pravin Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ashok Kumar, Advocate Shri Rohit Kumar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rohit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks adjournment for making arguments on the next date fixed.

3. List for hearing on 01.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 752 of 2024

Sgt Ashutosh Raj (Dismissed)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh , Advocate Shri Sardul Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the applicant at some length.

3. List this case for further hearing on 18.11.2026 as part-heard case.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 342 of 2025

HFO Arun Kumar Tripathi (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocate Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Abhisehk Pandey, Advocate Shri Yogesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Bhagwat Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Due to paucity of time, case could not be taken up.

3. List for hearing on 10.02.2027.

SB