Daily order sheet, C2, 13 Oct 2026 on 13 October 2026

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name shall be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Rakesh Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is physically present and Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. counsel for the respondents is virtually present.

3. Matter pertains to ACR which requires consideration.

Admit.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and allowed four weeks time to file Counter Affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed by the applicant within two weeks, thereafter.

6. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Supl. No. 2)

O.A. No. 982 of 2026 with M.A. No. 1191 of 2026

Ex Hav/Clk (SD) Surendra Singh

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Wg Cdr SN Dwivedi (Retd),

Advocate

Versus Union of India &Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name shall be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Wg Cdr SN Dwivedi (Retd), Ld. Counsel for the applicant is physically present and Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Ld. counsel for the respondents is not present.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and perused the records.

4. There has been delay for more than 05 years, 05 months and 13 days in filing this Original Application. Delay Condonation Application has been filed by the applicant.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents may file objection against delay condonation application by next date fixed.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Supl. No. 3)

EX.A. No. 316 of 2026 Inre O.A. No. 08 of 2025

Hav (MACP NB Sub) Sanjay Kumar

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India &Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Rajesh Shukla, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name shall be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Anuj Sharma, advocate holding brief of Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is physically present and Shri Rajesh Shukla, Ld. counsel for the respondents is virtually present.

3. This fresh execution application has been filed by the applicant for non- implementation of order dated 13.01.2025 passed by this Tribunal in O.A. No. 08 of 2025.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks’ time to seek instructions and to file compliance affidavit.

5. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Supl. No. 4)

EX.A. No. 317 of 2026 Inre T.A. No. 10 of 2022

Smt Rajeshwari Devi, W/o Late Hav Ramveer Singh Chauhan Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Veer Raghav Chaubey, Advocate

Versus Union of India &Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name shall be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Veer Raghav Chaubey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is physically present and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is virtually present.

3. This fresh execution application has been filed by the applicant for non implementation of order dated 04.10.2023 passed by this Tribunal in T.A. No. 10 of 2022.

4. On perusal of record it transpires that order of this Tribunal dated 04.10.2023 has already been complied with. Further, the applicant had approached the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench and Hon’ble High Court, Lucknow Bench modified the order of this Bench vide order dated 17.04.2026 passed in Writ Petition No. 3838 of 2026.

5. Since the order of this Tribunal has been complied with, Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and allowed time to file objection against maintainability of this Execution Application.

6. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Supl. No. 5)

M.A. No. 1192 of 2026 Inre O.A.(A). No. 467 of 2026

Ex Sep/MT Kamlesh Yadav

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Ms. Vibha Yadav, Advocate

Versus Union of India &Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Ishan Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Ms. Vibha Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are physically present. M.A. No. 1192 of 2026.

2. An early hearing application alongwith the affidavit has been filed by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant with a prayer to prepone the date of hearing. The case is already fixed for hearing on 01.03.2027. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as mentioned in the early hearing application and also keeping in mind that the said case pertains to SCM, the early hearing application is allowed and now the case be listed for admission on 27.11.2026

3. List this case for admission on 27.11.2026.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 1)

EX-A. No. 107 of 2024 Inre T.A. No. 3 of 2017

Sep (MT) Kamlesh Prasad

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Virat Anand Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India &Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri GS Sikarwar, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri RK Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Virat Anand Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is physically present and Shri GS Sikarwar, Ld. counsel for the respondents is virtually present.

2. Heard the Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that Writ Petition against order of this Tribunal has been filed before the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad, Lucknow Bench but he has not received any instructions about this case.

5. Proxy counsel submitted that even after laps of more than three years of the order of this Bench, no stay order has yet to be filed by the respondents.

6. In this circumstances, respondents are directed to make compliance of the order provisionally subject to final outcome of the Writ Petition filed by them before the Hon’ble High Court after obtaining an undertaking on affidavit from the applicant to the effect that, in case, any adverse order is passed against him, he would return all the amount, if any, and comply with the order of the Hon’ble High Court passed in Writ Petition.

7. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 2)

Ex. Appl. 135/2024 in O.A. No. 165 of 2023

Ex. Sub Ravi Sharan Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Dr. Chet Narayan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Maj. Gen. Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing in the revised call, Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Dr. Chet Narayan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Sri Jitendra Prasad, Senior Accounts Officer, PAO Corps of Signals, Jabalapur is also virtually present and submitted that the order relating to implementation of the order of this Tribunal is pending at the level of Senior Records Officer. In the circumstances, there is no other option but to summon the responsible officers of PAO Corps of Signals, Jabalapur and Senior Records Officer, who shall apprise this Tribunal why the order of this Tribunal has not yet been complied with and also file personal affidavits for the same. In case the order of this Tribunal is complied with in the meanwhile, there is no need to appear the concerned officers before this Tribunal on the next date of listing.

3. (Maj Gen. Sanjay Singh) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta) Member (A) Member (J) Girish/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 3)

Ex. Appl. 158/2024 in O.A. No. 691 of 2022

Smt. Om Prabha Devi

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri K.K.S. Bisht, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Dr. Chet Narayan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Maj. Gen. Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing in the revised call, none appears on behalf of the applicant. Adjournment slip has been received on behalf of the applicant for adjournment of the case. Dr. Chet Narayan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present.

2. On going through the record, it reveals that the respondents’ counsel submitted that GSL has been issued and compliance of the order be made soon. But till date, the order of Tribunal has not yet been complied with.

4. Sri Jitendra Prasad, Senior Accounts Officer, PAO Corps of Signals, Jabalapur is also virtually present and submitted that the order relating to implementation of the order of this Tribunal is pending at the level of Senior Records Officer. In the circumstances, there is no other option but to summon the responsible officers of PAO Corps of Signals, Jabalapur and Senior Records Officer, who shall apprise this Tribunal why the order of this Tribunal has not yet been complied with and also file personal affidavits for the same. In case the order of this Tribunal is complied with in the meanwhile, there is no need to appear the concerned officers before this Tribunal on the next date of listing.

5.

6. Copy of this order be made available to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

(Maj Gen. Sanjay Singh) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta) Member (A) Member (J) Girish/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 4)

O.A. No. 573 of 2022 with M.A. No. 504 of 2026 alongwith O.A. No. 880 of 2021 (Decided)

Hav Baggu Mahesh

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Virat Anand Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri RK Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Virat Anand Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is physically present and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. counsel for the respondents is virtually present.

2. Since the Ld. Counsel for the applicant is not present and proxy counsel is not fully aware about this case, the case is passed over for the day.

3. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 5)

O.A. No. 334 of 2024 with M.A. No. 399 of 2024

Rfn Shivansh Baliyan

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Virat Anand Singh and

Shri Narendra Kumar Mishra, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri RK Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Virat Anand Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. counsel for the respondents are physically present.

2. Today, this case is listed for filing of better affidavit on behalf of the applicant but neither the better affidavit has been filed nor the applicant counsel is present before the Bench. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the case is passed over for the day.

3. Better affidavit to be filed by the applicant by next date fixed.

4. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 6)

O.A. No. 489 of 2025

Hav Veer Prakash

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi and

Shri Anshuman Srivastava, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Rajesh Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Sri Umesh Bahpai brief holder o Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Rajesh Shukla, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for applicant seeks time to file Rejoinder Reply. Time as prayed is allowed.

3. Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 7)

O.A. No. 579 of 2025

Susheela and Another Parents of L/Nk Late Arun Kumar Singh Applicants

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicants : Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Mohd. Zafar Khan,

Shri Saurabh Yadav, Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav and

Shri Surendra Kumar, Advocates Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the ld. Counsel for applicants. Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for Union of India,, Mohd. Zafar Khan, Ld. Counsel for respondent No. 6 and 7, both are present through video conferencing. Shri Saurabh Yadav Ld. counsel for the respondent No. 8 is present before the court.

2. Neither the counsel for the applicant is present nor he has filed Rejoinder Reply.

3. Counter Reply filed by respondent No. 8 is taken on record

4. Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 8)

O.A. No. 669 of 2025

Sgt Daya Shankar Pandey (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Dhiraj Kumar, Shri Tatsat Shukla

and Shri Rahul Pal, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RC Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Dhiraj Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing. Sri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for applicant is present before the court. Shri RC Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents has filed counter Affidavit, which is taken on record. Ld. Counsel for applicant may file Rejoinder Reply.

3. Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 9)

O.A. No. 888 of 2025

Hav Tech(SA) Shiv Prasad Yadav

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Maj Mohitma Badkur Lalita Yadav, R.Chandra Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri RKS Chauhan, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Sri R. Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri RKS Chauhan, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents seeks time to file counter reply. Last opportunity is granted to the ld. Counsel for respondents to file counter reply

3. Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 10)

O.A. No. 953 of 2025

Miss Devi Maya Gurung D/o Nb Sub(Late) Kulman Singh Gurung Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Maj SM Mustafa(Retd), Mrs Sonal Kharbanda

Khurana, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Sunil Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Maj SM Mustafa(Retd), Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Sunil Sharma, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents submitted that some short time be given to file counter affidavit. Last opportunity is granted to the ld. Counsel for respondents to file counter reply. If respondents failed to file counter reply, opportunity for filing C.A. will be closed.

3. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 11)

O.A. No. 12 of 2026

Ex Sgt Nitesh Kumar Shrivastaw

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Mrs. Prerna Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Mrs. Prerna Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present through video conferencing..

2. Learned counsel for applicant submitted that he wants to withdraw this O.A.

3. Accordingly, O.A. is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. No order as to costs.

(Maj Gen Sanjay Singh) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta) Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 12)

O.A. No. 506 of 2026

Ex Sgt Chandan Yadav

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rang Nath Pandey and Shri Rahul Pandey,

Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Rang Nath Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondent, both are present before the court.

2. Ld. Counsel for applicant presses for interim relief and submitted that dues like leave encashment, GIS, Provident Fund, Gratuity and Children Education Allowance be provided to the applicant till the finalization of the District Court Martial proceedings.

3. Ld. Counsel for respondents is directed to file counter affidavit as well as objection against the interim relief as prayed by the learned counsel for the applicant.

4. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 13)

O.A. No. 882 of 2026

Sub Ram Surat Pandey (Retd)

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Parijaat Belaura, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Parijaat Belaura, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court

2. Ld. Counsel for the applicant was directed to take steps for serving notice to respondents No. 4 and 5 but steps has not been taken. Two weeks further time is granted to the ld. Counsel for applicant to take steps.

3. Ld. Counsel for respondents is directed to file objection against interim relief prayer.

4. Prayer for interim relief shall be decided on the next date.

5. Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 14)

O.A.(A). No. 584 of 2026

Shatrudhan Saw (Seaman First Class (Radar and Plots) Applicant through wife Lata Barman

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Shatendra Kumar Singh and

Shri Brijendra Kumar Verma, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri DK Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, None appeared on behalf of the applicant. Shri DK Pandey, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. If the learned counsel for applicant failed to appear before the court on the next date, then the O.A. shall be dismissed in default.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submitted that objection on maintainability of O.A. is ready and the same shall be filed before the registry during the course of the day.

4. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 15)

T.A. No. 20 of 2024

Smt Ritanjali Rath @ Mishra W/o Late Hav Chandra Sekhar Mishra Petitioner By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner : Shri Amit Asthana, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RC Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Amit Asthana, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court. Shri RC Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through video conferencing..

2. In pursuance of the order dated 28.7.2026, learned counsel for applicant submitted that time be granted to move amendment application.

3. Ld. Counsel for respondents submitted that entire record pertaining to this T.A. is not available with him. Ld. Counsel for applicant is directed to provide entire record of this T.A. to the counsel for respondents.

4. Counter Reply is available on record. Ld. Counsel for applicant is not inclined to file Rejoinder Reply. Now pleadings are complete.

5. In between ld. Counsel for applicant may move amendment application.

6. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 16)

O.A. No. 969 of 2022

Smt Omwati Devi M/o Late Sep Bijendra Kumar

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Shri Ranvijay

Singh, Shri Ashutosh Kumar Srivastava, Advocates Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Akhilesh Singh brief holder for Shailendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court. Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. counsel for the respondents, Union of India is present through video conferencing. Sri Vinod Singh, Ld.Counsel for ADIS submitted that he has already filed vakalatnama but his name is not shown in the cause list. Registry is directed to show the name of Sri Vinod Singh as counsel for respondent (AGIF) in future cause list. Sri Ranvijay Singh, ld. Counsel for respondent No. 7 is present before the court.

2. Brief holder for learned counsel for applicant seeks adjournment. Case is adjourned.

3. Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 17)

O.A. No. 813 of 2024

Smt. Chhaya Devi

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri K.K. Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Dr. Chet Narayan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Maj. Gen. Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing in the revised call, Shri K.K. Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Dr. Chet Narayan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties at length.

3. Judgment is reserved.

(Maj Gen. Sanjay Singh) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta) Member (A) Member (J) Girish/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 18)

O.A. No. 615 of 2025

Girja Devi W/o Sep Raj Kishor Pandey (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh and

Shri Abhishek Singh, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Mrs. Anju Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Abhishek Singh holding brief for Sri Sudhir Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is virtually present. However, Mrs. Anju Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents is physically present.

2. Proxy counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submitted that arguing counsel is out of station and as such the case may be adjourned for the day.

3. Rpm/-Girish/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 19)

T.A. No. 20 of 2017

Smt Mamta Devi & Others W/o Ex Cpl Late Dhananjay Kumar Petitioner

By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Maj Vinay Sharma,

Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is virtually present. However, Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Ld. counsel for the respondents is physically present.

2. As per the Office report, the original records is kept in the Almirah of SO (Listing). S.O. (Listing) is directed to produce the same in the Court on the next date of listing.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks adjournment of the case.

4. Rpm/-Girish/-