Daily order sheet, C1, 12 Oct 2026 on 12 October 2026

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Anurag Mishra, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents in the future cause list.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Anurag Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. This is a fresh execution application filed for implementation of order dated 27.04.2026 of this Tribunal passed in Original Application No. 1207 of 2024.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks time to seek instructions and to file affidavit of compliance of the order of this Tribunal.

6. List on 04.03.2027.

(Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

SB/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 2) Ex-A. No. 308 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 862 of 2026

Ex L/NK Mahesh Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RC Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri RC Shukla, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents in the future cause list.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri RC Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. This is a fresh execution application filed for implementation of order dated 30.08.2024 of this Tribunal passed in Original Application No.862 of 2026.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks time to seek instructions and to file affidavit of compliance of the order of this Tribunal.

6. List on 04.03.2027.

SB/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 3)

RA No. 43 ofg 2026 with MA No. 1163 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 989 of 2024

Col. Tapas Kumar Chaturvedi (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Bihari Lal Verma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RC Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri RC Shukla, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Bihari Lal Verma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri RC Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. This is recall application filed by the learned counsel for the applicant alongwith delay condonation application.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed two weeks time to file objection.

6. List on 17.02.2027.

SB/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 4)

TA No. 29 of 2026

Maj Brajesh Kumar (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Deepti Prasad Bajpai, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Ms. Deepti Prasad Bajpai, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. Her name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On behalf of the applicant, Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate wants to file Vakalatnama on behalf of the applicant. If the Vakalatnama is filed, his name be shown as counsel for the applicant.

3. This Transferred Application has been received from AFT (PB) New Delhi vide order dated 31.07.2026.

4. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate is present on behalf of the applicant through virtual mode and Ms. Deepti Prasad Bajpiai, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that record of the T.A. is not available with her.

6. Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to provide copy of Original Application as well as copy of counter affidavit to the learned counsel for the respondents before next date fixed.

7. Counter affidavit is also on record.

8. Learned counsel for the applicant may file rejoinder affidavit, if any, till next date of listing.

9. SB/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 5)

TA No. 30 of 2026 with MA No. 1094 of 2026

Ex Sgt Malkhan Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On behalf of the applicant, Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate wants to file Vakalatnama on behalf of the applicant. If the Vakalatnama is filed, his name be shown as counsel for the applicant.

3. This Transferred Application has been received from AFT (PB) New Delhi vide order dated 14.10.2026.

4. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate is present on behalf of the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that record of the T.A. is not available with him.

6. Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to provide copy of Original Application as well as copy of counter affidavit to the learned counsel for the respondents before next date fixed.

7. Counter affidavit is also on record.

8. Learned counsel for the applicant may file rejoinder affidavit, if any, till next date of listing.

9. SB/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 6)

TA No. 33 of 2026 with MA No. 1095 of 2026

L/NK Dharmendra Kumar Sharma (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate Shri Anshuman Srivastava, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On behalf of the applicant, Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi and Shri Anshuman Srivastava, Advocate have filed Vakalatnama which is taken on record. Registry is directed to shown their names as counsel for the applicant in the future cause list.

3. This Transferred Application has been received from AFT (PB) New Delhi vide order dated 14.08.2026.

4. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that record of the T.A. is not available with him.

6. Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to provide copy of Original Application as well as copy of counter affidavit to the learned counsel for the respondents before next date fixed.

7. Counter affidavit is also available on record.

8. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he is not inclined to file rejoinder affidavit.

9. Now, pleadings are complete.

10. List for final hearing on 22.02.2027.

SB/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 7)

TA No. 34 of 2026

Maj Raman Mishra (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Siddharth Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Gyan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Gyan Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On behalf of the applicant, Shri Siddharth Singh, Advocate wants to file Vakalatnama on behalf of the applicant. If the Vakalatnama is filed, his name be shown as counsel for the applicant.

3. This Transferred Application has been received from AFT (PB) New Delhi vide order dated 07.08.2026.

4. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Siddharth Singh, Advocate is present on behalf of the applicant and Shri Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that record of the T.A. is not available with him.

6. Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to provide copy of Original Application as well as copy of counter affidavit to the learned counsel for the respondents before next date fixed.

7. Counter affidavit is also on record.

8. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that pleadings are complete.

9. List for final hearing on 22.02.2027.

SB/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 100 of 2021 with MA No. 1244 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 104 of 2020

Ex Nb Sub Shiv Shankar Chaubey

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RC Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri RC Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that Union of India has duly complied the order and Corrigendum PPO has already been issued but the learned counsel for the applicant submitted that 8% interest part has not been complied with by the Bank, so he wants to implead the Bank in this matter as opposite party No. 5, i.e. Chief Manager, Union Bank of India, CPPC, Nariman Point, Mumbai and opposite party No. 6 to Branch Manager, Union Bank of India, Patrahi, Jaunpur (UP).

3. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection. So, the impleadment application moved by the applicant is hereby allowed and learned counsel for the applicant is directed to carry out amendment in the Execution Application within seven days.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant is further directed to take step for service of notice to respondents No. 5 & 6 within two weeks.

5. SB/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Sl. No.2)

Ex-A. No. 184 of 2022 Inre: OA No. 733 of 2020 Ex Rect /NA Hari Om

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vinay Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents has filed compliance affidavit which is taken on record.

3. Copy of the compliance affidavit duly received by the learned counsel for the applicant and he wants to file objection on compliance affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks time is granted to the learned counsel for the applicant to file objection on compliance affidavit.

5. SB/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 338 of 2022 Inre: OA No. 614 of 2021

Cpl. Shiv Singh Yadav (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri VP Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate

Mohd. Zafar Khan, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents No. 1 to 4 is present before the court and Mohd. Zafar Khan, Ld. Counsel for the respondents No. 5 & 6 is present through virtual mode.

2. Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate appeared on behalf of the applicant and submitted his name is not shown in the cause list. Registry is hereby directed to show name of Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav as counsel for the applicant in future cause list.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents No. 5 & 6 submitted that State Bank of India has already filed compliance affidavit alongwith due and drawn statement which is available on record but the learned counsel for the applicant submitted that after migration in SPARSH, due and drawn statement filed on behalf of the PCDA is not available on record.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents, i.e. Union of India and Legal Representative is hereby directed to provide the reply.

5.

6. Copy of the order be provided to PCDA rep for necessary compliance.

SB/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 5 of 2023 with MA No. 1119 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 412 of 2021 alongwith CA No. 02 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 412 of 2021

Ex NK Madan Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KKS Bisht, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri KKS Bisht, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is not present. Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Shri KKS Bisht, Ld. Counsel for the applicant seeks adjournment.

3. SB/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 215 of 2023 with MA No. 574 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 575 of 2022

Col. Bibhash Chandra Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that he has no instruction in the matter while learned counsel for the applicant submitted that Writ Petition which has been filed by the respondents has been duly rejected by the Hon’ble High Court on 17.04.2026.

3. Six months have already passed but neither compliance has been done nor learned counsel for the respondents has any instruction. In the circumstances, there is no other option but to direct to Director PS-4 to appear before the Bench through virtual mode to explain the reason for non compliance of the order of the Bench on the next date fixed.

4. If compliance is done in between there is no need to appear Director PS-4 on next date of listing.

5.

6. Copy of order be given to the learned counsel for the respondents/Legal Representative for compliance.

SB/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 34 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 453 of 2023

Ex Sgt Gunjan Kumar Jha

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Keshav Sharma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Vishwesh Kumar, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Keshav Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode. Shri Vishwesh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present, however, Legal Representative is present.

2. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Legal Representative submits that matter is subjudice before the Hon’ble High Court.

4. SB/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 84 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 920 of 2023 Ex LME Vivek Yadav

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ved Prakash, Advocate

Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Gyan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vinay Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents has filed compliance affidavit which is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that Corrigendum PPO has been issued.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks and is allowed four weeks time to file objection on compliance affidavit.

5. SB/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 115 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 801 of 2023

Ex LMA Himanshu Shekhar Tiwari

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode and Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents has filed compliance affidavit which is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that Corrigendum PPO has been issued and payment has also been made to the applicant.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks and is allowed four weeks time to file objection on compliance affidavit.

5. SB/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 106 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 1174 of 2024

Sgt Ramesh Kumar Dhawan (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, Advocate

Shri Abhishek Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode and Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that time may be granted for seeking necessary instruction in the matter.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents is hereby directed to file status report of the case till next date of listing.

6. SB/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 107 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 1305 of 2023

Ex L Nk Sudhir Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Devendra Kumar, Advocate Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vinay Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that compliance is under process.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents is hereby directed to file compliance affidavit otherwise responsible officer to appear through virtual mode to explain the reason for non compliance of the order of this court on next date of listing because more than 2 years have passed but order has not been implemented

6. SB/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 108 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 979 of 2022

Ex AG PO EL (P) Suraj Kumar Verma

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Devendra Kumar, Advocate Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vinay Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present. Neither Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present nor Legal Representative of Navy is present.

2. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. So, in the circumstances DPA Navy is hereby directed to appear through virtual mode, to explain the reasons for non compliance of the order of this Tribunal on the next date fixed.

4. SB/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 116 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 1189 of 2024

MWO (HFO) Desh Raj Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Advocate

Shri Ram Jivan Dixit, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Gyan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the applicant which is taken on record. Registry is directed to show his name as counsel for the applicant in the future cause list.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that Writ Petition No. 3289/2026 is pending before the Hon’ble High Court but there is no stay order.

4. So, In these circumstances, respondents are directed to make compliance of the order provisionally subject to final outcome of the Writ Petition filed before the Hon’ble High Court after obtaining undertaking on affidavit from the applicant to effect that in case any adverse order is passed against him, he would return all the amount, if any, and comply with the order of the Hon’ble High Court in Writ Petition.

5. As prayed by the learned counsel for the respondents four weeks further time is granted to comply the order provisionally and file provisional compliance affidavit.

6. Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi submitted that Shri Ram Jivan Dixit, Advocate is not legal counsel for the applicant. Therefore. Registry is directed to delete name of Shri Ram Jivan Dixit as counsel for the applicant and show name of Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi alongwith Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, as counsel for the applicant.

7.

8. Copy of order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

SB/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 117 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 297 of 2025

MWO (HFO) Rajesh Kumar Yadav (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ram Jivan Dixit, Advocate Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the applicant which is taken on record. Registry is directed to show his name as counsel for the applicant in the future cause list.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that Writ Petition which is filed by the Union of India assailing the order of this Bench is duly dismissed by the order dated 03.04.2026.

4. Since, Writ Petition was dismissed and more than six months have already passed but the compliance affidavit has not been filed.

5. In the circumstances, PD, DAV, Air Force to appear through virtual mode to explain the reasons for non compliance of the order of this Bench on the next date fixed.

6. If the compliance has been done, there is no need to appear PD DAV on the next date fixed.

7. Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi submitted that Shri Ram Jivan Dixit, Advocate is not legal counsel for the applicant. Therefore. Registry is directed to delete name of Shri Ram Jivan Dixit as counsel for the applicant and show name of Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi alongwith Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, as counsel for the applicant.

8.

9. Copy of order be provided to the learned counsel for the respondents/Legal Cell for necessary compliance.

SB/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 303 of 2026

Col. Narendran K (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Shri Anshuman Srivastava, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri JN Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Anuj Sharma, Advocate holding brief of Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri JN Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks time to file counter affidavit.

3. SB/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 304 of 2026 with MA No. 366 of 2026

Ex Sep Jagtap Vijay Narayan

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Anuj Sharma, Advocate holding brief of Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Rajesh Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Time was granted to the respondents to file objection on delay condonation application as well as on maintainability which has not been filed.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks further time to file objection on delay condonation application.

4. SB/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 305 of 2026 with MA No. 367 of 2026

Ex Hav Vikram Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Nishant Verma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Nishant Verma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Time was granted to the applicant to move amendment application to implead OIC Records, Jabalpur which has not been filed.

3. In pursuance to order dated 22.04.2026, learned counsel for the applicant seeks and is allowed two weeks further time to move amendment application.

4. SB/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 306 of 2026 with MA No. 368 of 2026

Ex Nk Om Prakash Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Nishant Verma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Nishant Verma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents filed objection on delay condonation application which is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks and is allowed two weeks further time to move amendment application.

4. SB/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 310 of 2026 Ex Hav Karuna Shankar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Advocate

Shri Ram Jivan Dixit, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the applicant which is taken on record. Registry is directed to show his name as counsel for the applicant in the future cause list.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi submitted that Shri Ram Jivan Dixit, Advocate is not legal counsel for the applicant. Therefore. Registry is directed to delete name of Shri Ram Jivan Dixit as counsel for the applicant and show name of Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi alongwith Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, as counsel for the applicant.

5. SB/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 311 of 2026

Ex Sep Anil Kumar Chaudhary

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ajit Kakkar, Advocate

Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RC Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Anuj Sharma, Advocate holding brief of Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court. Shri RC Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present, however, Legal Representative is present.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. In the interest of justice, four weeks further time, as last opportunity, is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

4. SB/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 315 of 2026 with MA No. 983 of 2026 with MA No. 377 of 2026 Ex Hav Sunil Kumar Maurya

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Ms. Alka Saksena, Advocate Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Sunil Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Ms. Alka Saksena, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present. Shri Sunil Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present, however, Legal Representative is present.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant has moved amendment application which is registered as M.A. No. 983/2026.

3. By means of amendment application, applicant wants to bring on record rejection order of second appeal but learned counsel for the applicant does not want to amend the prayer. So, amendment application (M.A. No. 983/2026) is infructuous and stands disposed of. M.A. No. 377 of 2026

4. There is delay of 11 months and 05 days in filing Original Application. Delay condonation application has been filed by the applicant.

5. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that delay caused in filing of Original Application is not deliberate, but on account of reasons given in affidavit filed in support of application.

6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

7. We are of the view that ground of delay mentioned in affidavit annexed with delay condonation application is sufficient. Delay condonation application is allowed and delay in filing application is condoned. Delay condonation application stands disposed of. O.A. No. 315 of 2026

8. This Original Application has been filed for grant of disability pension.

9. Matter needs adjudication.

10. Admit.

11. Learned counsel for the respondents is granted four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

12. SB/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 328 of 2026

Ex Dfr (MACP Nb Ris) Chandra Prakash

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate Shri Anshuman Srivastava, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Prerna Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Anuj Sharma, Advocate holding brief of Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi , Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Ms. Prerna Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that parawise comments are still awaited. She seeks and is allowed four weeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. SB/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 337 of 2026

Ex Sub Ashok Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Virendra Kumar Gupta, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Virendra Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode and Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that parawise comments have been received and counter affidavit is under preparation and seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. SB/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 356 of 2024

Ex Sub Sushil Kumar Yadav

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ashok Singh, Advocate Shri Ankur Rawat, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present.

2. It is informed by the learned counsel for the respondents that similar matter is subjudice before the Larger Bench of AFT (PB) New Delhi.

3. List for hearing on 28.04.2027.

SB/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1240 of 2024

Ex CHEL (P) Kunal Kishor Gaurav

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manish Kumar Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manish Kumar Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode and Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. It is informed by the parties that similar matter is subjudice before the Larger Bench of AFT (PB) New Delhi.

3. List for hearing on 29.04.2027.

SB/-

ORDER SHEET

TA No. 32 of 2024 Gp Capt Swaran Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri JN Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri JN Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Today, learned counsel for the applicant filed rejoinder affidavit which is taken on record.

3. List for physical final hearing on 11.01.2027.

SB/-