Daily order sheet, C2, 12 Oct 2026 on 12 October 2026

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name shall be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are physically present.

3. This O.A. has been filed by the applicant under Section 14 of the AFT Act, 2007 to challenge the adverse remarks/pen picture alongwith interim relief.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and allowed four weeks time to file objection against maintainability of the O.A. as well as on Interim Relief.

5. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Supl. No. 2)

M.A. No. 1183 of 2026 Inre O.A. No. 234 of 2025

Hav DSC Chandra Prakash Rathaur(Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Keshav Sharma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name shall be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Keshav Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are virtually present.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant has moved amendment application through M.A. No. 1183 of 2026 and prayed that due to typographical mistake in the first page of order dated 16.07.2026 passed in O.A. No. 234 of 2025, the Army No. of the applicant was written as 145771613-Y while correct Army No. is 14577613-Y.

4. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, since the Army Number written in order dated 16.07.2026 due to typographical mistake so Army Number 145771613-Y be read as 14577613-Y. Accordingly, Army Number be corrected in order dated 16.07.2026 passed in O.A. No. 234 of 2025.

5. This order is the part & parcel of the order dated 16.07.2026 passed in O.A. No. 234 of 2025. Aforesaid M.A. alongwith O.A. is disposed off.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Supl. No. 3)

O.A. No. 511 of 2025 with M.A. No. 617 of 2025

Sqn Ldr Mahendra Pal Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri SN Singh Gaherwar, Shri Ajit Singh

Gaherwar and Ms. Preeti Singh, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Namit Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri SN Singh Gaherwar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is physically present and Shri Namit Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is virtually present.

2. Today, this case is listed for admission of the case. Ld. Counsel for the applicant is not ready to argue the case on admission. He, therefore, seeks and allowed four weeks further time for better preparation and argue of the case on admission.

3. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Supl. No. 4)

T.A. No. 31 of 2026

Cpl Pratap Srivastava (Retd)

Petitioner By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner : Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name shall be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Rahul Pal and Shri Dhiraj Kumar on behalf of the applicant is taken on record. Their names be shown as counsel for the applicant in future cause list.

3. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is physically present and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is virtually present.

4. This Transferred Application has been received from the Principal Bench, New Delhi.

5. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that original application alongwith copy of the counter affidavit is available with him and the same will be handing over to the Ld. Counsel for the respondents. He further submitted that he does not wish to file rejoinder affidavit.

6. Now, pleadings are complete.

7. List on 12.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Supl. No. 5)

T.A. No. 32 of 2026

Ex Sigmn (DMT) Abhay Kumar Yadav

Petitioner By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner : Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name shall be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. Shri Vinay Pandey, advocate submits that he will file Vakalatnama on behalf of the applicant during course of the day in Registry. Registry is hereby directed to show his name as counsel for the applicant in future cause list, if the Vakalatnama filed by him.

3. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Vinay Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are virtually present.

4. This Transferred Application has been received from the Principal Bench, New Delhi after order dated 01.09.2026 alongwith Original Petition and Counter Affidavit. Applicant may file Rejoinder Affidavit before the next date fixed.

5. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET

EX-A No. 383 of 2023 Inre O.A. 53 of 2023

Sony Kushwaha Widow, Late Ex Nk Nagendra Singh Kushwaha Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rahul Pal & Shri Vikas Singh Chauhan,

Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Dr. Chet Narayan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, none appears on behalf of the applicant. Dr. Chet Narayan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is physically present.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that compliance affidavit has already been filed and the Corrigendum PPO was issued on 04.08.2026 and no grievance is left to address.

3. Since no grievance is pending in respect of the applicant, this execution application is disposed off in full and final satisfaction.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET

EX.A. No 148 of 2026 Inre O.A. No. 661 of 2024

Mrs Anuradha Singh W/o Nk Abhay Pratap Singh & another Applicants By Legal Practitioner for the Applicants : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicants is physically present and Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. counsel for the respondents is virtually present.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Legal Representative apprised that in pursuance of the order passed by the Tribunal dated 06.01.2026 in O.A. No. 661 of 2024, the respondents have comply the order of the Tribunal and the applicant is getting 5.5% of Pay and Allowances as mentioned in the order since May 2026.

4. Since compliance has been done, therefore, this Execution Application is disposed off and if any grievance will left then the applicant may approach to this Tribunal further.

Member (A) Member (J) Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET

EX.A. No. 172 of 2026 Inre O.A. No. 166 of 2025

Capt Ashok Bajpai (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Dr. Alok Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is physically present and Dr. Alok Mishra, Ld. Cunsel for the respondents is virtually present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that till date no instruction has been received. He, therefore, seeks and allowed four weeks further time to comply the order of the Tribunal passed in O.A. No. 166 of 2025.

3. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 5)

M.A. No. 1182 of 2026 with M.A. No. 669 of 2026 Inre O.A. No. 406 of 2025

Lt Col Sangram Singh Deora

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Maj RD Singh (Retd), Advocate

Versus Union of India &Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri GS Sikarwar, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, no one appears on behalf of the applicant. Shri GS Sikarwar, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is virtually present.

2. Lt Col Tarun Pillai, AMS, MS Branch, Army Headquarters, New Delhi is virtually present.

3. Today, this case is listed for Recall of the order dated 20.07.2026 passed in O.A. No. 406 of 2025.

4. Since the Ld. Counsel for the applicant is not present, today, this recall application could not be heard. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the case is adjourned for the day.

5. Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 6)

M.A. No. 1123 of 2026 Inre Ex.A. 430 of 2023 Inre O.A. No. 879 of 2022

Ashish Kumar, S/o Late Ex Nk Kishan Lal

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Parijaat Belaura, Advocate

Versus Union of India &Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Mrs. Amrita Chakraborty, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Parijaat Belaura, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Mrs. Amrita Chakraborty, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for applicant filed recall application (M.A. No.1123/2026) for recalling the order dated 31.08.2026 passed in Execution Case No. 430/2023. Learned counsel for applicant submitted that on 31.08.2026, he could not appear before the bench and Execution Case No. 430/2023 was disposed off. The cause shown in the application is found sufficient to recall the order dated 31.08.2026. Accordingly order dated 31.08.2026 is recalled and matter is restored to its original number i.e. Execution Case No. 430/2023. M.A. No. 1123/2026 stands disposed off.

3. Learned counsel for respondents may file compliance affidavit on the next date.

4. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 622 of 2025

Ex Sub (Hony Lt) Mahabir Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Vinay Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. Counsel for applicant seeks time to file Rejoinder Reply. Time as prayed is allowed.

3. Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 635 of 2025

Sgt Rajeev Ranjan (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Tatsat Shukla, Shri Rahul Pal and Shri

Dhiraj Kumar, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is also present before the court.

2. Counsel for the respondents submits that Counter Affidavit is ready and the same shall be filed with the registry during the course of day. Copy of Counter Affidavit has duly been received by the counsel for applicant, who seeks time to file Rejoinder Reply. Rejoinder Reply may be filed within 02 weeks.

3. Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 968 of 2025

Ex POME Shambhu Kumar Sriwastaw

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manish Kumar Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri DK Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Manish Kumar Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri DK Pandey, Ld. counsel for the respondents both are present through video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for respondents submits that counter affidavit is ready and the same shall be filed with the registry during the course of day.

3. Learned counsel for applicant may file Rejoinder Reply

3. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 22 of 2026

Smt Lilawati Devi Widow of Ex Nk(TS) Ramdev Yadav Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ashok Singh and Shri Ankur Rawat,

Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Ashok Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Ld. counsel for the respondents both are present through video conferencing.

2. The matter relates to family pension , which needs adjudication.

3. Admit.

4. On behalf of the respondent No. 4, Treasury Officer, Bhojpur, Aara, Bihar filed counter affidavit along with PPO, which is taken on record.

5. Learned counsel for respondents (Union of India) Shri Kaushik Chatterjee seeks time to file counter affidavit. Time as prayed is allowed.

6. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 159 of 2026

Miss Pavitra Darlami D/o Ex Rfn Late Bahadur Thapa Darlami Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Maj SM Mustafa (Retd), Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri DK Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Maj SM Mustafa (Retd), Lt Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri DK Pandey, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents submits that Counter affidavit is under preparation and seeks some more time to file counter affidavit. Time as prayed is allowed. Counter affidavit may be filed within 04 weeks after handing over copy of the same to the learned counsel for applicant.

3. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 270 of 2026

Hav/SKT Naim Khan

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rohitash Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Deepak Kumar holding brief of Shri Rohitash Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court.

2. Counsel for applicant seeks time to file reply to the objection filed on behalf of the respondents on maintainability of the O.A. Time as prayed is allowed.

3. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 13)

O.A. No. 527 of 2026

Cpl Neeraj Kumar (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh &

Shri Ramesh Chodhary, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Mahendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. counsel for the respondents (Union of India) both are present before the court.

2. Memo of appearance filed by Sri Santosh Singh holding brief of Sri Jai Prakash, Advocate on behalf of respondent No. 5 i.e. on behalf of Officer-in- charge, Zila Sainik Kalyan Evan Punarvas Karyalaya, Kanpur Nagar, which is taken on record. Registry is directed to show the name of Sri Jai Prakash, as counsel for respondent No. 5 in future cause list.

3. Memo of appearance filed by Sri Kapil Kandpal and Sri Tushar Kant Mishra, Advocate on behalf of respondent No. 6 i.e. on behalf of Registrar, Indian Institute of Technology, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, which is taken on record. Registry is directed to show the names of Sri Kapil Kandpal and Sri Tushar Kant Mishra, Advocates, as counsel for respondent No. 6 in future cause list.

4. Counter Affidavit on behalf of respondent No. 5 has been filed along with Memo of appearance which is taken on record.

5. Ld. Counsel for respondent No. 6 seeks time to file objection on interim order.

6. Since counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.6 has not been filed and respondent No. 6 seeks time to file objection on interim order passed on 14.07.2026, hence interim order passed on 14.07.2026 shall be extended till the next date of listing.

7. Learned counsel for Union of India may also file counter affidavit .

8. HLS/-

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 884 of 2026 with M.A. No. 1061 of 2026

Asha Devi w/o Ex Sep Late Vinod Kumar Yadav Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Col Ashok Kumar (Retd) and Shri Rohit Kumar,

Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Rohit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. Ld. Counsel for respondents seeks time to file objection on delay condonation application. Time as prayed is allowed.

3. Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 15)

O.A. No. 934 of 2026 with M.A. No. 1118 of 2026

Hav Rakesh Kumar Sharma (Retd)

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Shri Saurabh Yada

and Ms. Alka Saksena , Advocates

Versus Union of India &Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Ms Alka Saksena, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present in Court and Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Today, this case is listed for admission.

3. There is delay of 01 year and 01 month in filing this Original Application. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has moved delay condonation application supported with affidavit.

4. Ld. Counsel for respondents seeks and is allowed two weeks’ time to file objection on delay condonation application as well as on maintainability of this O.A.

5. rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 16)

O.A. No. 456 of 2020

Ex Sep Anil Kumar Sharma & Another

Applicants

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicants : Shri SG Singh, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Anand Kumar Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Shri SG Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicants and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Brief holder seeks time to file written points of arguments, which is allowed.

3. List on 05.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

rathore

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 14 of 2023

Smt Neeru Gangwar & another D/o Smt Kamla Devi(Deceased) Applicants By Legal Practitioner for the Applicants : Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicants and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the record.

3. Arguments concluded

4. Order reserved.

(Maj Gen Sanjay Singh) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta) Member (A) Member (J) rathore

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 100 of 2023

Ex Nk Ravi Bhushan

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Lt Col Nidhikant Dhyani (Retd) and

Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present.

2. On request of learned counsel for the applicant, the case is passed over for the day.

3. List on 12.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

(Maj Gen Sanjay Singh) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta) Member (A) Member (J) rathore

ORDER SHEET

O.A. No. 717 of 2023 with M.A. No. 262 of 2026

Ex Sgt Vinod Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Dhiraj Kumar and Shri Rahul Pal, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Dhiraj Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode and Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present in Court. Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present physically.

2. By means of M.A. No. 262/2026, additional documents have been filed on behalf of the applicant, which are taken on record. Ld. Counsel for the applicant is directed to provide copy of additional documents to Ld. Counsel for the respondents within a week, who may file reply, if any, by the next date fixed.

3. List on 13.04.2027 for disposal of M.A. No. 262/2026.

rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 20)

O.A. No. 524 of 2024

Ex Sub (Nur Asst) Ravi Kumar Singh Chauhan

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KKS Bisht, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Dr. Chet Narayan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Dr. Chet Narayan Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present.

2. An adjournment has been sought on behalf of the Ld. Counsel for the applicant on the ground that he is not well. Adjournment allowed.

3. List on 13.04.2027 for physical final hearing.

rathore