Daily order sheet, CB J & N, 05 Oct 2026 on 5 October 2026

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Tarun P.S. Takuli, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with and payment has also been credited in the account of the applicant.

3. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

4. Cost so deposited by the respondents shall be remitted to the applicant.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 2)

Ex. A. No. 55 of 2022 Inre: O.A. No. 563 of 2020

Ex. Nb. Sub. Shyam Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Tarun P.S. Takuli, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Tarun P.S. Takuli, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with and payment has also been made to the applicant. So grievance of the applicant is duly redressed.

3. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 3)

Ex. A. No. 56 of 2022 Inre: O.A. No. 185 of 2021

Ex. NK. Mohan Chandra Joshi

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Tarun P.S. Takuli, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Tarun P.S. Takuli, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that GSL has already been issued in the month of June 2026 and compliance is under process. He prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

5. List on 07.10.2026.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 4)

Ex. A. No. 57 of 2022 Inre: O.A. No. 546 of 2020

Ex. Sep. Khim Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Tarun P.S. Takuli, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Tarun P.S. Takuli, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Response affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

6. Respondents are also directed to deposit all the cost due against them by the next date of listing and the cost deposited shall be remitted to the applicant.

7. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 5)

Ex. A. No. 58 of 2022 Inre: O.A. No. 564 of 2020

Ex. Sep. Kishan Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Tarun P.S. Takuli, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Tarun P.S. Takuli, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with and payment has also been made to the applicant in the month of June 2026.

3. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

4. Cost so deposited by the respondents shall be remitted to the applicant.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 6)

Ex. A. No. 62 of 2022 Inre: O.A. No. 555 of 2020

Ex. Sep. Dori Lal

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Tarun P.S. Takuli, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Tarun P.S. Takuli, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with and payment has also been made to the applicant on 03.10.2026.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant conceded the fact that order has been complied with.

4. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 7)

Ex. A. No. 66 of 2022 Inre: O.A. No. 559 of 2020

Ex. Sep. Anand Ballabh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Tarun P.S. Takuli, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Tarun P.S. Takuli, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with and payment has also been made to the applicant on 03.10.2026.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant conceded the fact that order has been complied with.

4. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

5. Cost deposited by the respondents shall be remitted to the applicant.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 8)

Ex. A. No. 73 of 2022 Inre: O.A. No. 545 of 2020

Ex. Sep. Pratap Singh Karmiyal

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Tarun P.S. Takuli, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Tarun P.S. Takuli, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that being aggrieved with the order of this Bench, respondents approached the Hon’ble Apex Court by filing a SLP which is now duly dismissed on 18.11.2026.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents stated that the conditional GSL has already been issued on 22.08.2026 but he has no instructions with regard to payment.

6. Since, now the matter is settled, there is no other option, respondents are directed to comply the order in letter and spirit.

7. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

8. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 9)

Ex. A. No. 198 of 2022 Inre: O.A. No. 181 of 2021

Ex. L. NK. Subodh Kandwal

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Neeraj Upreti, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Neeraj Upreti, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Response affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents apprised the Court that the matter is subjudice before the Hon’ble Apex Court.

5. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 10)

Ex. A. No. 200 of 2022 Inre: O.A. No. 143 of 2020

Ex. Hav. Anand Singh Ram Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Neeraj Upreti, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Neeraj Upreti, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that during the pendency of this execution application the applicant is reported to be no more so he wants to file substitution application and seeks time for the same.

3. It is also submitted by the ld. Counsel for the applicant that earlier the respondents assailed the order of this Bench before the Hon’ble High Court of Uttarakhand by filing a writ petition which is now duly dismissed on 17.09.2026.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

5. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 11)

Ex. A. No. 310 of 2022 Inre: O.A. No. 427 of 2021

Ex. Nk. Devendra Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Response affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

5. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that writ petition filed by the respondents before the Hon’ble High Court has been now dismissed.

6. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

7. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No.12) Ex. A. No. 46 of 2023 Inre: O.A. No. 137 of 2022

Ex. Hav. Prem Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Neeraj Upreti, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Neeraj Upreti, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Response affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

5. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that the writ petition No. 127 of 2025 filed by the respondents against the order of this Bench has now been dismissed on 17.09.2027.

6. Since writ petition is dismissed so there is no other option, respondents are bound to comply the order in letter and spirit.

7. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks time to comply the order for which four weeks time is allowed.

8. It is made clear that if order is not complied with till the next date of listing, ADG-PS, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order passed by this Bench.

9. List on 25.01.2027.

10. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

11. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of ADG-PS.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 13) Ex. A. No. 47 of 2023 Inre: O.A. No. 710 of 2021

Ex. Hav. Lachham Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Response affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

5. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that the writ petition filed by the respondents against the order of this Bench has now been dismissed on 17.09.2027.

6. Since writ petition is dismissed so there is no other option, respondents are bound to comply the order in letter and spirit.

7. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks time to comply the order for which four weeks time is allowed.

8. It is made clear that if order is not complied with till the next date of listing, ADG-PS, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order passed by this Bench.

9. List on 25.01.2027.

10. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

11. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of ADG-PS.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 14)

Ex. A. No. 49 of 2023 Inre: O.A. No. 153 of 2022

Ex. L/Nk. Tej Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Neeraj Upreti, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Neeraj Upreti, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Compliance affidavit has not been filed on behalf of the respondents.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that conditional govt sanction letter has been issued by the respondents and the compliance has been done shortly. He seeks some more time to file compliance affidavit, which is allowed.

4. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 15)

Ex. A. No. 53 of 2023 Inre: O.A. No. 178 of 2022

L/Nk. Naresh Naudiyal

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Response affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that subject matter is pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court.

4. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 16)

Ex. A. No. 61 of 2023 Inre: O.A. No. 518 of 2020

Ex. Hav. Parvindra Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Neeraj Upreti, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Neeraj Upreti, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Status report filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that writ petition against order of this Tribunal was filed before the Hon’ble High Court which has been dismissed vide order dated 17.09.2025. He seeks some more time to file compliance affidavit, which is allowed.

4. It is hereby directed that all the cost deposited by the respondents be remitted in favour of the applicant.

5. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 17)

Ex. A. No. 262 of 2023 Inre: O.A. No. 709 of 2021

Col. P.R. Kathuria (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that writ petition filed against order of this Tribunal has been dismissed vide order dated 17.09.2026 and conditional govt sanction has been issued.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed some more time to file compliance affidavit, which is allowed.

4. It is hereby directed that since writ petition filed against order of this Tribunal has been dismissed, order of this Tribunal shall be complied with in letter in spirit.

5. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 18)

Ex. A. No. 335 of 2023 Inre: O.A. No. 1035 of 2022

Smt. Basanti Devi W/o Late Hav. Diwan Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vikram Singh Dhapola, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vikram Singh Dhapola, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Compliance affidavit has not been filed.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that writ petition filed against order of this Tribunal has been dismissed on 18.06.2026. He further submits that further time be allowed to file affidavit of compliance.

4. More than four months have passed from the date of dismissal of writ petition, but the respondents have failed to file compliance affidavit. In the circumstances, ADG PS shall remain present through virtual mode before this Tribunal on next date of listing to explain the reasons for non-compliance of order of this Tribunal. If order of this Tribunal is complied with before next date of listing, ADG PS need not to be present.

5. Copy of this order be provided to OIC Legal Cell for compliance.

6. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 19)

Ex. A. No. 336 of 2023 Inre: O.A. No. 1039 of 2022

Ex. Sub. M.C. Joshi

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vikram Singh Dhapola, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vikram Singh Dhapola, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Status report filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. Time was allowed to Ld. Counsel for the applicant for filing substitution application, which has not been filed.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that wife of the deceased soldier is seriously ill and because of this he could not file substitution application. He seeks some more time to file substitution application, which is allowed.

5. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 20)

Ex. A. No. 337 of 2023 Inre: O.A. No. 704 of 2022

Ex. Nk. Hayat Singh Kalakoti

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vikram Singh Dhapola, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vikram Singh Dhapola, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Compliance affidavit has not been filed.

3. Status report filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

4. Since the subject matter has been settled by the Hon’ble Apex Court, there is no option left to the respondents but to comply order passed by this Tribunal.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks some more time to comply order of this Tribunal, which is allowed.

6. If order of this Tribunal is not complied with by the next date fixed, ADG PS Shall remain present before this Tribunal through virtual mode to explain the reasons for non-compliance of order of this Tribunal. If order of this Tribunal is complied with before the next date of listing then there is no need for appearance of ADG PS.

7. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 21)

Ex. A. No. 239 of 2025 Inre: O.A. No. 1117 of 2023

Ex. Nk. Durga Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vikram Singh Dhapola, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Neeraj Upreti, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vikram Singh Dhapola, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Neeraj Upreti, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Compliance affidavit has not been filed.

3. Status report filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

4. Since the subject matter has been settled by the Hon’ble Apex Court, there is no option left to the respondents but to comply order passed by this Tribunal.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks some more time to comply order of this Tribunal, which is allowed.

6. If order of this Tribunal is not complied with by the next date fixed, ADG PS Shall remain present before this Tribunal through virtual mode to explain the reasons for non-compliance of order of this Tribunal. If order of this Tribunal is complied with before the next date of listing then there is no need for appearance of ADG PS.

7. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 22)

Ex. A. No. 241 of 2025 Inre: O.A. No. 186 of 2021

Ex. Spr. Rakesh Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that order passed by this Tribunal has been complied with and no grievance in respect of the applicant is pending.

3. Since order of this Tribunal has been passed and no grievance of the applicant is pending, this execution application is disposed off in full and final satisfaction.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 23)

Ex. A. No. 242 of 2025 Inre: O.A. No. 280 of 2024

Ex. Hav. Awadh Kumar Yadav

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Neeraj Upreti, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Neeraj Upreti, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Response affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. By means of response affidavit, Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that identical matter is pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court in which stay order has been issued in favour of the respondents.

4. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 24)

Ex. A. No. 243 of 2025 Inre: O.A. No. 151 of 2022

Jayanti Devi W/o Ex. NK. Mohan Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Neeraj Upreti, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Neeraj Upreti, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Response affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that writ petition filed against order of this Tribunal has been dismissed vide order dated 17.09.2025.

4. Since writ petition filed against order of this Tribunal has been dismissed by the Hon’ble High Court, therefore, there is no option left to the respondents but to comply order of this Tribunal.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks some more time to comply order of this Tribunal, which is allowed.

6. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 25)

Ex. A. No. 245 of 2025 Inre: O.A. No. 714 of 2022

Ex. Sub. Mahendar Singh Rawat

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Status report filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that against order of this Tribunal writ petition has been filed before the Hon’ble High Court, which is pending.

4. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 26)

Ex. A. No. 353 of 2025 Inre: O.A. No. 890 of 2024

Ex. Nk. Kripal Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri M.S. Bhandari, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri M.S. Bhandari, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that writ petition filed against order of this Tribunal has been dismissed vide order dated 05.05.2026.

3. The matter has been settled by the Hon’ble Apex Court. In the circumstances there is no option to comply order of this Tribunal in letter in spirit. On last occasion, last opportunity was granted to the respondents to comply order of this Tribunal but order of this Tribunal has not been complied with.

4. In the circumstances, ADG PS shall remain present before this Tribunal on next date of listing through virtual mode to explain the reasons for delay in implementing order of this Tribunal.

5. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 27)

Ex. A. No. 66 No. 2026 Inre: O.A. No. 291 of 2024

Master Shivam Singh Khatri (Minor) S/o Late Ex. Nk. Ranjit Singh (Minor through his natural guardian Smt. Prema Devi)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri M.S. Bhandari, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri M.S. Bhandari, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Status report filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that govt sanction letter has been issued on 16.09.2026 and order of this Tribunal shall be complied with shortly.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks further time to file compliance affidavit.

5. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 28)

Ex. A. No. 67 of 2026 Inre: O.A. No. 282 of 2023

Sep. Bikram Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Neeraj Upreti, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Neeraj Upreti, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Status report filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that against order passed by this Tribunal writ petition has been filed but no stay order has been issued.

4. Since appeal in similar matter has already been dismissed by the Hon’ble High Court, in the circumstances respondents are directed to provisionally comply order of this Tribunal subject to outcome of order passed by the Hon’ble High Court after obtaining undertaking from the applicant.

5. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 29)

Ex. A. No. 69 of 2026 Inre: O.A. No. 285 of 2024

Ex. Nk. Pratap Singh Bisht

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Neeraj Upreti, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Neeraj Upreti, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Response affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that although Writ Petition No. (SB) 523 of 2025 has been filed before the Hon’ble High Court at Uttarakhand assailing the order of this Tribunal before the Hon’ble High Court but there is no operative stay order.

6. In these circumstances, respondents are directed to make compliance of the order provisionally subject to final outcome of the Writ Petition filed before the Hon’ble High Court after obtaining an undertaking on affidavit from the applicant to the effect that, in case, any adverse order is passed against him, he would return all the amount, if any, and comply with the order of the Hon’ble High Court passed in Writ Petition.

7. As prayed by learned counsel for the respondents four weeks further time is granted to comply the order provisionally and file provisional compliance affidavit.

8. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 30)

O.A. No. 573 of 2025

Ex. Nb. Sub. Gajendra Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Neeraj Upreti, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Neeraj Upreti, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Rejoinder affidavit filed by the applicant is taken on record. Copy of same is duly received by the respondents’ counsel.

3. Pleadings are complete.

4. List for final hearing on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 31)

O.A. No. 59 of 2026 with M.A. No. 67 of 2026

Ex. Nk. Surendra Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Abhishek Sati, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai holding brief for Shri Abhishek Sati, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, Sr. Advocate assisted by Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate are present.

2. Objection filed by the respondents is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant seeks time to file reply to the objection. Time as prayed is allowed.

4. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 32)

O.A. No. 178 of 2026

Nk. Bhupal Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, Sr. Advocate assisted by Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate are present.

2. Counter affidavit filed by the respondents is taken on record.

3. Applicant’s counsel is not inclined to file rejoinder affidavit.

4. Pleadings are complete.

5. List for final hearing on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 33) O.A. No. 179 of 2026 with M.A. No. 231 of 2026 Ex. Nk. Raghubar Datt Ray

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, Sr. Advocate assisted by Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate for the respondents are present.

2. Reply to Objection to the delay condonation application filed by the applicant is taken on record. M.A. No. 231 of 2026

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that inordinate delay has not been properly and satisfactorily explained on day-to-day basis.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is residing in remote area of Distt. Champawat (Uttarakhand) and is unaware of his rights so he could not approach this Bench and the matter pertains to pension which is recurring cause of action.

5. We have considered the submissions of Ld. Counsel for the parties and we find that the cause shown for the delay is sufficient. Further being pensionary matter and in view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Union of India and Others Vs. Tarsem Singh (2008 (8) SCC 646), delay is condoned. Delay condonation application stands disposed of. O.A. No. 179 of 2026

6. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

7. Case needs adjudication.

8. Admit.

9. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks time to file Counter Affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

10. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 34) O.A. No. 180 of 2026

LAC Karan Bisht

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present. M.A. No. 232 of 2026

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. There is delay of more than 04 years 02 months and 29 days in filing of Original Application. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application. Cause of delay shown in the affidavit annexed with the delay condonation application are sufficient to condone the delay. Delay is condoned.

4. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 180 of 2026

5. This original application has been filed against the dismissal of the applicant.

6. Case needs adjudication.

7. Admit.

8. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

9. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 35)

O.A. No. 181 of 2026

Ex. Rect. Bhupendrra Singh Burathoki

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, Sr. Advocate assisted by Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Detailed order on separate sheets.

4. Misc. Application(s), if any, pending for disposal, shall be treated to have been disposed of.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 36)

O.A. No. 182 of 2026

Ex. Dfr. Sandeep Kumar Kharyal

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, Sr. Advocate assisted by Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate for the respondents are present.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted further four weeks time as a last opportunity to file Counter Affidavit.

4. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 37)

O.A. No. 183 of 2026

Nk. Surendra Dutt (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Pushpa Bhatt , Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, Sr. Advocate assisted by Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate for the respondents are present.

2. Rejoinder affidavit filed by the applicant is taken on record.

3. Pleadings are complete.

4. List for final hearing on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 38)

O.A. No. 184 of 2026

Hav. Safar Chhetri

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Counter affidavit filed by the respondents is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted two weeks time to file rejoinder affidavit.

4. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 39) R.A. No. 14 of 2026 Inre : O.A. No. 409 of 2019

Ex. Nb. Sub. Mahipal Singh Rawat

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri C.S. Rawat, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Neeraj Upreti, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vivek Kumar holding brief for Shri C.S. Rawat, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Neeraj Upreti, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted four weeks time to file objection to the delay condonation application.

3. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 40)

R.A. No. 35 of 2026 with M.A. No. 759 of 2026 Inre: O.A. No. 283 of 2023

Union of India & Others

Applicants By Legal Practitioner for the Applicants : Shri Neeraj Upreti, Advocate

Versus Ex. Spr. Suresh Singh

Respondent By Legal Practitioner for Respondent : Shri P.S. Bohra, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Neeraj Upreti, Ld. Counsel for the applicants and Shri P.S. Bohra, Ld. Counsel for the respondent are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents (Applicant in the O.A) file reply which is taken on record.

3. Since main file is not available and the main order dated 09.04.2026 was filed by the Bench consisting of Hon’ble Anil Kumar (Member-J) and Hon’ble Lt. Gen Anil Puri (Memberj-A), put up this file before the Bench consisting of me and Hon’ble Lt. Gen Anil Puri, Member-A.

4. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 41)

Diary No. 2449 of 2026

Ex. L/Nk. Amit Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Lt. Col. Nidhikant Dhyani (Retd), Advocate Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of appearance filed by Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents in the future cause list.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. In this case certain defects have been raised by the Registry.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant seeks some more time to remove the defects. Time as prayed is allowed.

5. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 42) Diary No. 2865 of 2026

Smt. Deepa W/o Late Jagat Singh (TA No. 12898523X)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Tarun P.S. Takuli, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Neeraj Upreti, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of appearance filed by Shri Neeraj Upreti, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents in the future cause list.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Neeraj Upreti, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is widow of the ex-serviceman and the ex-serviceman was entitled for terminal benefits in view of services rendered by him in the territorial army.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that the instant case may be disposed of as applicant is seeking decision on the representation preferred by her and ends of justice would be served if a direction is given by this Tribunal to the respondents/competent authority to consider and dispose of the pending representation dated 29.06.2026 of the applicant attached as Annexure A-9 to this application which may be decided by the Respondents by way of reasoned and speaking order within a stipulated period of time.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to this and agrees with the submission of the applicant.

6. In view of the above innocuous prayer of the applicant, respondents/competent authority is directed to consider and decide the representation dated 29.06.2026 of the applicant (Annexure A-9) and pass a reasoned and speaking order according to law within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, under intimation forthwith to the applicant.

7. It is made clear that nothing has been commented upon the merits of the case.

8. Applicant shall be at liberty to approach proper forum if he is not satisfied with the decision of the respondents passed on his representation.

9. The instant application (Dy No. 2865/2026) is disposed of accordingly at the admission stage itself.

10. Copy of the order be provided to the ld. counsel for the parties.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 43)

O.A. No. 567 of 2020

Ex. LAC Rajendra Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vinay Bhatt, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vinay Bhatt, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submitted that he does not want to file reply to the amended original application but seeks time to file written submission alongwith the case law.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant may also file written submission alongwith case law in his favour.

4. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 44)

O.A. No. 1030 of 2022

Ex. Hav. Surendra Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Neeraj Upreti, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Neeraj Upreti, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. O.A is Dismissed.

4. Detailed order on separate sheets.

5. Misc. Application(s), if any, pending for disposal, shall be treated to have been disposed of.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 45)

O.A. No. 279 of 2023

Ex. Nk. (TS) Surendra Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri C.S. Rawat, Advocate Shri Anil Anthwal, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vivek Kumar holding brief for Shri C.S. Rawat, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the applicant appearing for the applicant seeks adjournment.

3. Case is adjourned accordingly.

4. List on 07.10.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 46)

O.A. No. 1129 of 2023

Janki Devi W/o Late Sep. Devendra Prasad Arya

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate Shri D.K. Joshi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate

Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Order Reserved.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 47)

O.A. No. 1158 of 2023

Ex. Pnr. (Revervist) Ranjit Pundir

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri N.K. Papnoi, Advocate Ms. Vijay Laxmi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Neeraj Upreti, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri N.K. Papnoi and Ms. Vijay Laxmi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Neeraj Upreti, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. O.A is disposed of.

4. Detailed order on separate sheets.

5. Misc. Application(s), if any, pending for disposal, shall be treated to have been disposed of.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 48) O.A. No. 1162 of 2023

Ex. Hav. Devendra Badola

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajesh Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Supplementary counter affidavit filed by the respondents is taken on record.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. This original application has been filed by the applicant for grant of disability pension to the applicant from the date of his retirement.

5. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was enrolled in the Army as Sepoy on 29.11.1985 and after serving for more than 26 years of service he retired on completion of terms of engagement in the rank of Havildar on 30.11.2011 after having being low medical category Shape-P2 (permanent) with 30% disability for Primary Hypertension for life and 20% disability for Glucose Tolerance & Obesity for life and over all disability was quantified at 50% for life. The applicant submitted his claim for granting his disability pension which has been rejected by the respondents vide letter dated 30.03.2012 being held both the disabilities as NANA. Thereafter, the applicant preferred his first appeal dated 10.08.2020 which too has also been rejected by the respondents.

6. Ld. Counsel for the respondents has filed counter affidavit and submitted that the instant original application has been filed by the applicant in the year 2023 before this Bench but prior filing of this O.A, the applicant has already filed an another O.A No. 1710 of 2020 for same cause of action / same relief before the Principal Bench of this Tribunal at New Delhi.

7. Ld. Counsel for the respondents further submitted that as per law, the same applicant cannot file two separate O.As for same relief/ same cause of action. The applicant has suppressed the fact of filing the previous O.A. Hence, this O.A is not maintainable and is violation of Sec 10 of CPC and this O.A is liable to- be dismissed.

8. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

9. Ld. Counsel for the respondents has filed supplementary counter affidavit alongwith the copy of the original application filed by the applicant before the Principal Bench of this Tribunal.

10. Perusal of the file reveals that the applicant has sought the same relief as requested in the instant O.A before us. The applicant has sought quashment of impugned order dated 10.08.2020 and grant of disability pension in both the O.As.

11. As per section 10 of the CPC, no Court shall proceed with the trial of any suit in which the matter in issue is also directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit between the same parties, or between parties under whom they or any of them claim litigating under the same title where such suit is pending in the same or any other Court in India having jurisdiction to grant the relief claimed, or in any Court beyond the limits of India established or continued by the Central Government and having like jurisdiction, or before the Supreme Court.

12. In view of above, we are of the considered view that in the present case, it is crystal clear from pleadings that matter in issue in both OAs is directly and substantially identical. Therefore, this is a fit case to invoke section 10 of the CPC as the applicant has filed both the O.As with same cause of action.

13. The applicant has preferred O.A No. 1710 of 2020 before the Principal Bench of this Tribunal at New Delhi for same cause of action / same relief as sought in the present O.A. The matter is barred by Res Sub- Judicata.

14. Accordingly, the instant O.A is dismissed.

15. Misc. Application(s), if any, pending for disposal, shall be treated to have been disposed of.

/RK/-

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 49)

O.A. No. 929 of 2024

Ex. Sub. Tika Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Lt. Col. Nidhikant Dhyani (Retd), Advocate Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Neeraj Upreti, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Neeraj Upreti, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that similar matter is subjudice before the Larger Bench of this Tribunal at Principal Bench, New Delhi.

3. List on 25.01.2027.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 50)

O.A. No. 695 of 2025

Smt. Gangi Devi W/o Nk.(Late) Murari Lal

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Dinesh Gahatori, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Dinesh Gahatori, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, Sr. Advocate assisted by Shri Rajesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. O.A is disposed of.

4. Detailed order on separate sheets.

5. Misc. Application(s), if any, pending for disposal, shall be treated to have been disposed of.

ORDER SHEET

(Sl. No. 51)

T.A. No. 07 of 2023

Ex. Sep. Dhirendra Prasad Dwivedi

Petitioner By Legal Practitioner for the Petitioner : Shri Kishore Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Neeraj Upreti, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Kishore Rai, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Neeraj Upreti, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. T.A is Dismissed.

4. Detailed order on separate sheets.

5. Misc. Application(s), if any, pending for disposal, shall be treated to have been disposed of.