Daily order sheet, C1, 30 Sep 2026 on 30 September 2026

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Gyan Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present. M.A. No. 1148 of 2026

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is delay of 02 months and 09 days in filing of Original Application. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application. Cause of delay shown in the affidavit annexed with the delay condonation application are sufficient to condone the delay. Delay is condoned.

5. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 953 of 2026

6. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

7. Case needs adjudication.

8. Admit.

9. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

10. List on 29.03.2027.

(Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 2) OA No. 954 of 2026 Dfr ADT (Hav) Kotwal Tushar Shriram

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate Shri Ajit Kakkar, Advocate Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. Her name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents orally submitted that the applicant represented to the respondents to redress his grievances on 10.07.2026 and without awaiting the outcome of the request for premature retirement from service, the applicant has filed Original Application before this Bench.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant conceded and submitted that the Annexure A-1, annexed with the Original Application is pending with the respondents and the same be decided within the stipulated time.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to decide representation of the applicant annexed as Annexure A-1 to the Original Application.

6. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, we hereby dispose of the Original Application finally with direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the applicant annexed as Annexure A-1 to the Original Application, received by the respondents on 10.07.2026 by a speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law, if not already decided, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order and communicate the decision to the applicant accordingly.

7. With the aforesaid direction, the Original Application is disposed of finally.

8. Let a copy of this order be provided to learned counsel for the respondents/AFT Legal Cell for onward transmission/compliance.

SB

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 3)

DY. No. 3050 of 2026

Ex L NK Vijay Bahadur

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Suyash Kumar Pandey, Advocate Shri Vinod Kumar Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Somesh Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Somesh Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri Somesh Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

3. This is a defective application. Defect has been raised by the Registry which has not been rectified by the applicant.

4. List on 20.11.2026.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 4)

Ex-A. No. 296 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 798 of 2024

Hav Ram Nath Ram (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the respondents and perused the records.

4. This is a fresh execution application filed for implementation of order dated 14.11.2025 of this Tribunal passed in Original Application No. 798 of 2024.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks time to seek instructions and to file affidavit of compliance of the order of this Tribunal.

6. List on 20.04.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 5)

Ex-A. No. 297 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 255 of 2025

CPO LOG (SC) Yogesh Kumar Dubey (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri DK Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri DK Pandey, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri DK Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the respondents and perused the records.

4. This is a fresh execution application filed for implementation of order dated 13.05.2026 of this Tribunal passed in Original Application No. 255 of 2025.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks time to seek instructions and to file affidavit of compliance of the order of this Tribunal.

6. List on 20.04.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 6)

Ex-A. No. 298 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 603 of 2024

Ex Nb Sub Kuvendra Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Mohd. Zafar Khan, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Mohd. Zafar Khan, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. This is a fresh execution application filed for implementation of order dated 01.09.2025 of this Tribunal passed in Original Application No. 603 of 2024.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks time to seek instructions and to file affidavit of compliance of the order of this Tribunal.

6. List on 20.04.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 7)

Ex-A. No. 303 of 2026 Inre; OA No. 666 of 2023

Ex Hav Krishnendu Patra

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Gyan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Gyan Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that respondents had filed writ petition to assail the order dated 19.10.2023 which has now been duly dismissed on 24.09.2026.

5. This is a fresh execution application filed for implementation of order dated 19.10.2023 of this Tribunal passed in Original Application No. 666 of 2023.

6. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks time to seek instructions and to file affidavit of compliance of the order of this Tribunal.

7. List on 20.04.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 8)

Ex-A. No. 304 of 2026 Inre; OA No. 1179 of 2024

Ex Hav Sawan Singh Digari

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri SN Dwivedi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. Her name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri UC Bajpai holding brief for Shri SN Dwivedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. This is a fresh execution application filed for implementation of order dated 31.07.2025 of this Tribunal passed in Original Application No. 1179 of 2024.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks time to seek instructions and to file affidavit of compliance of the order of this Tribunal.

6. List on 20.04.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 9)

MA No. 1150 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 1101 of 2024

Ex Sep Mangani Mukeshbhai Aalingbhai

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ajit Kakkar, Advocate

Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. This misc. application has been filed by the applicant for early hearing of the case but none is present on behalf of the applicant to press this application.

3. List on 22.12.2026.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 44 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 326 of 2022

Ex Ris Satendra Singh Yadav

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Satendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Devesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri Devesh Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with. PPO has already been issued and payment to the tune of ₹ 10,51,699/- has also been made to the applicant in the month of June 2026.

3. Perusal of the pension slip of June 2026 reflects that payment has been made to the applicant.

4. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Sl. No.2)

Ex-A. No. 504 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 958 of 2022

Lt. Col. Himanshu Suryavanshi (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Aditya Singh Puar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri GS Sikarwar, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri GS Sikarwar, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with. Payment has also been made to the applicant in the month of October and November 2025. No grievance is left.

3. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 11 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 140 of 2023

Ex JWO Prem Shankar Kushwaha

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri JN Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri JN Mishra,Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that writ petition which is filed by the respondents is duly dismissed on 22.07.2026. Since writ petition is dismissed respondents are bound to comply the order.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

6. List on 16.04.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 12 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 434 of 2022

Ex MWO Sunil Vishwakarma

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Kavita Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Ms. Kavita Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that writ petition which is filed by the respondents is duly dismissed on 07.09.2026. Since writ petition is dismissed respondents are bound to comply the order.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

6. List on 16.04.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 19 of 2024 alongwith RA No. 30 of 2024 with MA No. 760 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 828 of 2022

MWO (HFO) Bhawan Nath Giri (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate Shri Saurabh Yadav, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri SN Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Saurabh Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri SN Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. In this case, a review application has been filed by the respondents and copy of review application is duly received by the counsel for the applicant.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant seeks time to file reply. Time as prayed is allowed.

4. List on 16.04.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 22 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 611 of 2022

MWO (HFO) Bhawan Nath Giri (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RKS Chauhan, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Saurabh Yadav holding brief for Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri RKS Chauhan, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with. PPO has been issued and payment has also been made to the applicant.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant conceded the fact that order has been complied with.

4. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 54 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 880 of 2022

MWO (HFO) Anvit Kuamr Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pahul Srivastava, Advocate Ms. Monika Yadav, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Anju Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Pahul Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Ms. Anju Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that Writ Petition No. 8015 of 2025 was filed assailing the order of this Tribunal before the Hon’ble High Court which was connected with W.P No. 9365/2023. Now the w.p no. 9365/2023 has been dismissed but the writ petition in this case is still pending and there is no operative stay order.

5. In these circumstances, respondents are directed to make compliance of the order provisionally subject to final outcome of the Writ Petition filed before the Hon’ble High Court after obtaining an undertaking on affidavit from the applicant to the effect that, in case, any adverse order is passed against him, he would return all the amount, if any, and comply with the order of the Hon’ble High Court passed in Writ Petition.

6. A copy of the undertaking be also provided to the Departmental Representative to expedite the compliance of the order.

7. As prayed by learned counsel for the respondents four weeks further time is granted to comply the order provisionally and file provisional compliance affidavit.

8. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

9. List on 16.04.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 102 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 908 of 2022

WO Devendra Pal Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Shri Gopal Dwivedi, Advocate Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that GSL has been issued on 05.08.2026 and compliance is under process. He prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

5. List on 16.04.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 152 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 971 of 2022

Ex JWO Pravin Kumar Chauhan

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vinay Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Asheesh Agnihortri, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that GSL has been issued on 14.08.2026 and compliance is under process. He prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

5. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that Shri Devendra Kumar, Advocate was the co-counsel in the O.A but his name is not reflected in the cause list. Registry is directed to show his name also as counsel for the applicant in the next cause list.

6. List on 16.04.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 187 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 978 of 2022

Smt Bhuneshvari Devi W/o Late Ex Sep Kailash Singh Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate Shri Ashish Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents Nos. 1 to 3 and Shri Ashish Mishra Ld. Counsel for the respondents Nos. 4 & 5 are present.

2. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that interest part is still pending.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents apprised the Court that payment of interest is under process and seeks some more time. Time as prayed is allowed.

5. List on 16.04.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 374 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 721 of 2022

Lt. Col. Madhu Mohan Dube (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra,Advocate Shri Narayan Dutt Mishra, Advocate

Shri Satya Narayan Mishra, Advocate

Shri Abhishek Pandey, Advocate

Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocate Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Kavita Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Ms. Kavita Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that as per order of this Bench dated 02.02.2023, disability element of disability pension was granted to the applicant for two years from the next date of retirement. PPO has been issued and payment of ₹ 1,11,000/- has been made to the applicant.

4. Respondents were also directed to conduct RSMB of the applicant to assess the entitlement of disability pension. But after passing of more than four years, RSMB has not been conducted by the respondents.

5. In these circumstances, there is no other option, ADG-PS, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order dated 02.02.2023 and for not conducting the RSMB of the applicant who is senior citizen and is about 80 years old.

6. List on 16.04.2027.

7. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

8. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of ADG-PS.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 488 of 2024 Inre: OA No. 218 of 2023

Ex Nk Sant Ram

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that after the judgement of the Hon’ble Apex Court, respondents are bound to obey the order of this Bench. He prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

5. It is made clear that if compliance affidavit is not filed till the next date of listing, the Court shall pass coercive order against the respondents.

6. Cost deposited by the respondents shall be remitted to the applicant.

7. List on 16.04.2027.

8. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 221 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 1273 of 2023

Sqn Ldr Ritu (SSC) (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents as well as the applicant submitted that the order has been complied with in letter and spirit.

3. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 391 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 554 of 2024

Ex Hav Rakesh Kumar Dube

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KP Datta, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Vishwesh Kumar, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Advocate appears on behalf of the respondents and submitted that this case is allotted to him in place of Shri Vishwesh Kumar. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri KP Datta, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

6. List on 20.04.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 142 of 2025 with MA No. 168 of 2025

Veerendra Kumar S/o Late Ex Sep Lala Ram

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri BB Tripathi, Advocate Shri Amit Verma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri BB Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents No. 1 to 3 are present through virtual mode.

2. Reply to the objection on delay condonation application filed by the applicant is taken on record. M.A. No. 168 of 2025

3. There is delay of 26 years, 07 months and 23 days in filing Original Application. Delay condonation application has been filed by the applicant.

4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that delay caused in filing of Original Application is not intentional, but on account of reasons given in affidavit filed in support of application. He further submitted that the applicant approached the respondents on several times to redress his grievances but no action was taken by the respondents.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents vehemently opposed and submitted that long delay of more than 26 years has not been properly explained on day to day basis.

6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

7. We are of the view that ground shown in affidavit filed in support of application is sufficient. Delay condonation application is allowed and delay in filing application is condoned in terms of the Hon’ble Apex Court judgment in the case of Union of India and others vs. Tarsem Singh, (2008) 8 SCC 648. Delay condonation application stands disposed of. O.A. No. 142 of 2025

8. This Original Application has been filed for grant of disability element to the extent of 20%, rounded off to 50% from 01.01.1996. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that partial payment has been made to the applicant but remaining payment is still pending.

9. In the circumstances, matter needs adjudication.

10. Admit.

11. Learned counsel for the respondents No. 1 to 3 is granted four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

12. Issue notice to the respondents No. 4 & 5 returnable within four weeks.

13. Learned counsel for the applicant to take step within a week.

14. List on 04.03.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 144 of 2025 with MA No. 171 of 2025

Ex Sub Ashok Kumar Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, Advocate

Shri Dheerendra Kumar Agnihotri, Advocate Shri Vishnu Kant Awasthi, Advocate Shri Girish Tiwari, Advocate Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents handed over copy of the objection to the learned counsel for the applicant in the court which is duly received by him.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant may file reply to the objection till next date of listing.

4. List on 04.03.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 310 of 2025

POAF Nirmal Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Prerna Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Ms. Prerna Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents has filed counter affidavit which is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks and is allowed four weeks time to file rejoinder affidavit.

4. List for hearing on 16.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 311 of 2025 NK Carvalho Robert Anton (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is not present. Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents has filed counter affidavit which is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks and is allowed four weeks time to file rejoinder affidavit.

4. List on 04.03.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 312 of 2025

Sub Jaswant Rai (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Keshav Sharma, Advocate Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Keshav Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents has filed counter affidavit which is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks and is allowed four weeks time to file rejoinder affidavit.

4. List on 04.03.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 634 of 2025

Sgt Rajeev Ranjan (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Tatsat Shukla, Advocate Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate Shri Dhiraj Kumar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms Prerna Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Ms. Prerna Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the counter affidavit is prepared and she will file the same in the registry during the course of day.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant may file rejoinder affidavit within four weeks.

5. List on 05.03.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 688 of 2025 with MA No. 816 of 2025

Ex Rect Prahlad Singh Jawariya

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KK Misra, Advocate

Versus Chief of Army Staff & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri KK Misra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Objection on delay condonation application has already been filed by the respondents which is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that reply is ready and he will file the same in the Registry during the course of day.

4. Reply to the objection has been duly received by the learned counsel for the respondents

5. List on 05.03.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 753 of 2025 with MA No. 891 of 2025

Ex L/NK Yogendra Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Veer Raghav Chaubey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RC Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Veer Raghav Chaubey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri RC Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Objection on delay condonation application already filed by the learned counsel for the respondents is taken on record.

3. Copy of the objection is duly received by the learned counsel for the applicant who may file reply to the objection within four weeks.

4. List on 05.03.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 756 of 2025 with MA No. 662 of 2026 Ex Corporal Rajendra Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocate

Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Shri Abhishek Pandey, Advocate

Shri Yogesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Shri Chandan Kumar Pandey, Advocate Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Amendment application moved by the applicant is taken on record.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties on amendment application and perused the record.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant wants to substitute Para 8 (e). He further submitted that the statutory Review Appeal preferred by the applicant has been rejected by the respondents so he wants to amend sub prayer as under:- For: “Declare that the statutory Review Appeal preferred by the applicant before the Chief of the Air Staff is deemed to have been rejected by non-disposal within a reasonable period, and the same be set aside.” Read: “Issue/pass an order to quash/set aside the order passed by the Chief of the Air Staff, vide letter No. Air HQ/C 41471/116/Discip dated 03 Dec 2025. (Annexure A-1) annexed to the Amendment Application.”

5. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the proposed amendment.

6. Since the proposed amendment does not change the nature of the Original Application, amendment application is hereby allowed.

7. Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to incorporate the amendment within 15 days before the Registry and amended copy of the O.A. be provided to the learned counsel for the respondents.

8. List on 20.11.2026.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 929 of 2025

Ex Dfr HK Yaduvendra Singh Yadav

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rama Kant, Advocate Shri Pushpendra Kumar Dhaka, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Anju Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rama Kant, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Anju Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Counter affidavit filed by the respondents and rejoinder affidavit filed by the applicant are taken on record.

3. Pleadings are complete.

4. List this case for physical final hearing on 16.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 934 of 2025 Ex Sep Vijay Singh Bora (DSC)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Advocate

Shri Prakhar Kankan, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none appeared on behalf of the applicant. Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. As prayed, four weeks further time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit.

5. List on 05.03.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1046 of 2025 with MA No. 1194 of 2025

Ex NK Hemant Kumar Chand Rajan

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KKS Bisht, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Gyan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri KKS Bisht, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode and Shri Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not available.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents has already filed objection on delay condonation application which is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant may file reply to the objection within four weeks.

4. List on 05.03.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 91 of 2026

Ex Rfn Sunder Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KKS Bisht, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri KKS Bisht, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode and Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents has already filed objection on maintainability of the Original Application which is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant may collect the copy of the objection and file his reply till next date of listing.

4. List on 05.03.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 826 of 2023

Ex Nb Sub Sarjeet Singh Jat

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KP Datta, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri KP Datta, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents that similar matter is subjudice before Larger Bench.

3. List for hearing after outcome of the similar matter on 30.04.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 58 of 2024

Ex Nk Ashok Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Mohd. Zafar Khan, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Mohd. Zafar Khan, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Judgment reserved.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 883 of 2025

Sub /RGR Shishpal Kankar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Original application is disposed of.

4. For orders, see our order passed on separate sheets.

5. Misc. Application(s), pending if any, shall stand disposed of.

SB

ORDER SHEET

TA No. 35 of 2024

Smt. Raj Puri mother of GP Capt Sandeep Puri (Retd) Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Transferred Application is partly allowed.

4. Detailed order is placed on separate sheets.

5. Misc. Application(s), pending if any, shall stand disposed of.

SB