Daily order sheet, C1, 29 Sep 2026 on 29 September 2026

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Girish Chandra Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. This original application has been filed for conducting the Medical Board and grant of war injury pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

5. Case needs adjudication.

6. Admit.

7. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

8. During the course of arguments, ld. Counsel for the applicant stated that the applicant has impleaded Col. Krishna Kant Bajpai, Station Head Quarters, Garhi Cantt. Dehradun (Uttarakhand) as Respondent No. 5 but now he wants to delete him from the array of parties and seeks permission of this Court for the same. He is permitted to delete respondent No. 5 during the course of the day.

9. List on 29.03.2027.

(Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 2) OA. No. 942 of 2026 with MA No. 1134 of 2026

Smt. Ram Kumari W/o Late Hav Clk (GD) Chandrama Prasad Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Prerna Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Ms. Prerna Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. Her name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Ms. Prerna Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through Video Conferencing.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is delay of more than 12 years and 10 months in filing this original application. Applicant has filed delay condonation application for condoning the delay.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents raised objection with regard to delay in filing of this O.A. He prays for and is granted four weeks time to seek instructions and to file objection, if any, to the delay condonation application.

6. List on 30.11.2026.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 3) OA No. 944 of 2026 with MA No. 1136 of 2026 POGS Ravikant Tiwari (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through Video Conferencing. M.A. No. 1136 of 2026

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is delay of 09 months and 06 days in filing of Original Application. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application. Cause of delay shown in the affidavit annexed with the delay condonation application are sufficient to condone the delay. Delay is condoned.

5. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 944 of 2026

6. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

7. Case needs adjudication.

8. Admit.

9. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

10. List on 29.03.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 4) OA No. 948 of 2026 with MA No. 1144 of 2026 Hav Ranvir Kumar Shahi (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Tatsat Shukla, Advocate Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate Shri Dhiraj Kumar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Tatsat Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court. M.A. No. 1144 of 2026

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is delay of 10 months and 15 days in filing of Original Application. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application. Cause of delay shown in the affidavit annexed with the delay condonation application are sufficient to condone the delay. Delay is condoned.

5. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 948 of 2026

6. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

7. Case needs adjudication.

8. Admit.

9. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

10. List on 29.03.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 5)

OA No. 950 of 2026 with MA No.1145 of 2026

Hav Sunil Kumar Verma

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Satya Narayan Mishra, Advocate

Shri Pradeep Kumar Shukla, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Satya Narayan Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is delay of more than one year in filing this original application. Applicant has filed delay condonation application for condoning the delay.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents raised objection with regard to maintainability of this O.A before this Tribunal on the ground that applicant is resident of Dausa, Rajasthan and also delay in filing of this O.A. He prays for and is granted four weeks time to seek instructions and to file objection, if any, on the maintainability of the O.A as well as to the delay condonation application.

6. List on 03.12.2026.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 6) OA No. 951 of 2026 with MA No. 1146 of 2026 NK Bhagwan Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pradeep Kumar Shukla, Advocate

Shri Satya Narayan Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Satya Narayan Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Manu Kumar Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing. M.A. No. 1146 of 2026

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is delay of 07 months and 10 days in filing of Original Application. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application. Cause of delay shown in the affidavit annexed with the delay condonation application are sufficient to condone the delay. Delay is condoned.

5. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 951 of 2026

6. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

7. Case needs adjudication.

8. Admit.

9. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

10. List on 29.03.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 7)

OA No. 952 of 2026 with MA No. 1147 of 2026

Sub Sher Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pradeep Kumar Shukla, Advocate

Shri Satya Narayan Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Satya Narayan Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents raised objection with regard to maintainability of this O.A before this Tribunal on the ground that the applicant is resident of State of Himachal Pradesh. He prays for and is granted four weeks time to seek instructions and to file objection, if any, on the maintainability of the O.A as well as to the delay condonation application.

5. List on 03.12.2026.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 8)

Ex-A.No. 301 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 190 of 2019

Ex MWO Damodar Prasad Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Asheesh Agnihortri, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Asheesh Agnihotri, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through Video Conferencing.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents raised objection that the modified order of the Hon’ble High Court could not be implemented by AFT and he shall file objection. He prays for and is granted four weeks time to seek instructions and to file objection, if any, in this regard.

5. List on 21.12.2026.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 9)

Ex-A. No. 302 of 2026 Inre; OA No. 260 of 2020 Wg. Cdr. Upendra Thakur (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through Video Conferencing.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents raised objection that the modified order of the Hon’ble High Court could not be implemented by AFT and he shall file objection. He prays for and is granted four weeks time to seek instructions and to file objection, if any, in this regard.

5. List on 21.12.2026.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

EX-A No.147/2023 Inre OA No.562/2022

Lt Col Arun Kant Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri JL Joel, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Prerna Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri JL Joel, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Prerna Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present virtually.

2. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with and PPO has been issued and payment has also been made to the applicant.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that in pursuance of order dated 09.01.2023, interest part has not been given by the respondents.

5. Respondents may file calculation sheet and objection, if any, till the next date of listing.

6. List on 14.04.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Sl. No.2)

EX-A No.149/2023 Inre OA No.561/2022

Lt Col Bhavesh Joshi (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri JL Joel, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Preeti Mala, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri JL Joel, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Ms. Preeti Mala, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

2. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with and PPO has been issued and payment has also been made to the applicant.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that in pursuance of order dated 09.01.2023, interest part has not been given by the respondents.

5. Respondents may file calculation sheet and objection, if any, till the next date of listing.

6. List on 14.04.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

EX-A No.258/2023 Inre OA No.615/2022 Ex Nk Jiwan Chandra Pandey

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra , Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Preeti Mala, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Preeti Mala, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard ld. counsel for the respondents and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that undertaking has been received and compliance is under process. She seeks some more time to file compliance affidavit. Last opportunity is granted to file compliance affidavit till the next date of listing.

5. List on 14.04.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

EX-A No.291/2023 Inre OA No.813/2021

Smt Maya Devi w/o Late Prem Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KK Misra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Devesh Kumar, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri KK Misra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Devesh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present today. Departmental Representative is present for the respondents.

2. Compliance affidavit filed by the respondents is available on record.

3. Departmental Representative submits that the order has been complied with and no grievance is left.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant seeks time to file objection. He may file the same till the next date of listing.

5. List on 14.04.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

EX-A No.90/2024 Inre OA No. 173/2023 Ex JWO Kamal Kishor Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. In pursuance of order dated 02.04.2026, Sqr Ldr. AK Nautiyal from DAV Legal Cell is also present through video conferencing and submitted that being aggrieved with the order of this Bench, Department shall assail the order before the Hon’ble High Court.

3. Perusal of the file reveals that after passing of more than three years neither any writ petition has been filed nor any stay order is obtained in favour of the respondents.

4. In these circumstances, we are of the constant view to impose the cost of Rs. 20,000/- against the respondents which shall be remitted to the applicant, if they fail to produce any operative stay order in favour of the respondents till the next date of listing.

5. List on 14.04.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

EX-A No.132/2024 Inre TA No.42/2023 Ex HFO Piyush Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri SN Gaherwar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate on behalf of the applicant is taken on record. NOC has been obtained by the earlier counsel. Registry is directed to show his name in place of Shri SN Gaherwar in the next cause list as counsel for the applicant.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submitted that in pursuance of order dated 02.04.2026, applicant has already submitted his undertaking which is duly received by the respondents and there is no operative stay order in favour of the respondents.

4. In these circumstances, there is no other option, respondents are directed to comply the order passed by this Bench in letter and spirit.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks some more time to file compliance affidavit. Time as prayed is granted.

6. List on 14.04.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

EX-A No.133/2024 Inre TA No.43/2023 Ex HFO Amar Nath Pandey

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri SN Gaherwar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri RC Shukla, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate on behalf of the applicant is taken on record. NOC has been obtained by the earlier counsel. Registry is directed to show his name in place of Shri SN Gaherwar in the next cause list as counsel for the applicant.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri RC Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that although a Writ Petition has been filed assailing the order of this Tribunal before the Hon’ble High Court which is under consideration but there is no stay order.

5. In view of above, respondents are directed to make compliance of the order provisionally subject to final outcome of the Writ Petition filed before the Hon’ble High Court after obtaining an undertaking on affidavit from the applicant to the effect that, in case, any adverse order is passed against him, he would return all the amount, if any, and comply with the order of the Hon’ble High Court passed in Writ Petition.

6. As prayed by learned counsel for the respondents four weeks further time is granted to comply the order provisionally and file provisional compliance affidavit.

7. List on 14.04.2027.

8. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

EX-A No.247/2024 Inre OA No. 299/2023

Hony Lt Pushkar Singh Kashnyal

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri MK Awasthi holdng brief for Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with and payment has also been made to the applicant.

5. Ld. Counsel for the applicant is also of the view that order has been complied with and nothing remains in the matter to adjudicate.

6. In view of above, this execution application is disposed of in full satisfaction.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

EX-A No.325/2024 Inre TA No.1/2024 Ex AG AA-4 Rahul Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Devendra Kumar, Advocate Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vinay Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Compliance affidavit filed by the respondents is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with. PPO has been issued and payment has also been made to the applicant.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant conceded the fact that order has been complied with.

5. Since the order has been complied with, this Execution application is disposed of with full satisfaction.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

EX-A No.339/2024 Inre TA No.20/2023 Ex Sgt Pramod Kumar Sharma

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Surendra Kumar holding brief for Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that in pursuance of order dated 16.01.2026, applicant has not filed his undertaking so they could not comply the order.

3. Applicant is directed to provide his undertaking within 15 days to the respondents. A copy of undertaking be also provided to the Departmental Representative to expedite the compliance.

4. List on 14.04.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

EX-A No.83/2026 Inre OA No. 708/2024 Sgt Rivaldo Verma (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav , Advocate Shri Saurabh Yadav, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Surendra Kumar holding brief for Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that writ petition which is filed by the respondents is duly dismissed on 22.09.2026. He prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

5. List on 14.04.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No.1202 of 2024 with MA No. 1349 of 2024 LAC Mridul Dwivedi

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate Shri Akhil Srivastava, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri GS Sikarwar, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Vinay Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri GS Sikarwar, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that first objection raised by the learned counsel for the respondents is that no representation against the impugned order before the competent authority to redress his grievances, was given by the applicant, hence, he has not availed alternative remedy.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant has filed reply to the objection.

4. Since the final order has been passed by the competent authority for discharge and he challenged the discharge order in the Original Application, so, he approached before this Bench.

5. Since, the final order has been passed against the discharge, so, we agree that the applicant has challenged the order of discharge. In the circumstances, there is no requirement to approach superior officer for ventilating his grievances by availing alternative remedy by the applicant after final order has been passed by the competent authority.

6. Objection of the respondents is hereby not sustainable. M.A. No. 1349 of 2024

7. There is delay of 05 months and 10 days in filing Original Application. Delay condonation application has been filed by the applicant.

8. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that delay caused in filing of Original Application is not deliberate, but on account of reasons given in affidavit filed in support of application.

9. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

10. We are of the view that ground of delay mentioned in affidavit annexed with delay condonation application is sufficient. Delay condonation application is allowed and delay in filing application is condoned. Delay condonation application stands disposed of. O.A. No. 1202 of 2024

11. This Original Application has been filed by the applicant challenging the discharge order.

12. Matter needs adjudication.

13. Admit.

14. Learned counsel for the respondents is granted four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

15. List on 14.04.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No.252 of 2025 with MA No.302 of 2025 Ex Ops. Rajeev Kumar Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Ms. Hemlata, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Shiv Kumar Saroj, Advocate holding brief of Ms. Hemlata, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Today, this case is fixed for seeking direction from the respondents whether the academic documents have been returned to the applicant or still held with the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks further time to file written reply.

4. As prayed, four weeks time is granted to the learned counsel for the respondents to file written reply.

5. List on 21.12.2026.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No.608 of 2025 Ex Sub Subodh Kumar Chaturvedi

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Prerna Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Ms. Prerna Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that he is not inclined to file rejoinder affidavit.

3. List for final hearing on 17.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No.731 of 2025

Ex MACP Nb Sub Krishna Deo Tiwari

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Shiv Kumar Saroj, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Shiv Kumar Saroj, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that counter affidavit is prepared and during the course of day, he will counter affidavit in the Registry.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has received copy of counter affidavit. He seeks and is allowed four weeks time to file rejoinder affidavit.

5. List on 02.03.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No.924/2025 with MA No.1072/2025 Ex Rect Ajay Kumar Tiwari

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri AK Srivastava, Advocate Shri Ambuja Srivastava, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri AK Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Reply to the objection on the maintainability of this Original Application filed by the applicant is already available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted in the objection on maintainability of the Original Application that the applicant has not availed alternative remedy as per Section 21 of the AFT Act, 2007. Therefore, this O.A. is not maintainable.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has already requested to the respondents for joining in service through representations on three four times and copies of the representation/request have been annexed in the Original Application which are available on record. Thus, the applicant has already availed alternative remedy.

5. In the circumstances, objection raised by the respondents against maintainability is not sustainable. M.A. No. 1072 of 2025

6. There is delay of 05 months and 23 days in filing Original Application. Delay condonation application has been filed by the applicant.

7. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that delay caused in filing of Original Application is not deliberate, but on account of reasons given in affidavit filed in support of application.

8. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

9. We are of the view that ground of delay mentioned in affidavit annexed with delay condonation application is sufficient. Delay condonation application is allowed and delay in filing application is condoned. Delay condonation application stands disposed of. O.A. No. 924 of 2025

10. This Original Application has been filed against the order of dismissal.

11. Matter needs adjudication.

12. Admit.

13. Learned counsel for the respondents is granted four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

14. List on 02.03.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No.236/2026 with MA No. 254/2026 Ex ERA3 Ramhit Gautam

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manish Kumar Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri DK Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manish Kumar Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri DK Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present through virtual mode.

2. Time was granted to the respondents to file objection on delay condonation application as well as on maintainability which has not been filed.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks further time to file objection on delay condonation application as well as on maintainability of the Original Application.

4. List on 03.03.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No.252/2026 with MA No.304/2026 Ex POA(PH) Nitish Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manish Kumar Rai, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri DK Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manish Kumar Rai, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri DK Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Time was granted to the respondents to file objection on delay condonation application as well as on maintainability which has not been filed.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks further time to file objection on delay condonation application as well as on maintainability of the Original Application.

4. List on 03.03.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No.286 of 2026 Ex JWO Vinod Kumar Chaubey

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ved Prakash Pandey, Advocate Shri RK Singh, Advocate Shri Deepak Bhatt, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Shiv Kumar Saroj, Advocate holding brief of Shri Ved Prakash Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that counter affidavit is ready and he will in the Registry during the course of day.

3. Copy of counter affidavit is duly received by the learned counsel for the applicant.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks and is allowed four weeks time to file rejoinder affidavit.

5. List on 04.03.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 356 of 2026

Hav Ashok Kumar Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri keshav Sharma, Advocate holding brief of Rahul Pal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that parawise comments have been received. He seeks and is allowed four weeks further time to file counter affidavit.

4. List on 04.03.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 528 of 2026 with M.A. No. 758 of 2026

Nk Rewti Raman Pratap Singh Rajpoot

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Amit Asthana, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Amit Asthana, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Amendment application moved by the applicant is taken on record.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties on amendment application and perused the record.

4. This amendment application has been moved by the applicant that in relief clause (a) and last line of Annexure A-1, he wants to delete Annexure No. A-1.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection.

6. Amendment application is hereby allowed.

7. Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to carry out amendment during the course of day. M.A. No. 758 of 2026 stands disposed of.

8. This Original Application has been filed for grant of premature retirement.

9. Matter needs adjudication.

10. Admit.

11. Learned counsel for the respondents is granted four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

12. List on 04.03.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 738 of 2024

Ex Hav Rakesh Kumar Pal

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Preeti Mala, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Preeti Mala, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks time to file case law in support of his case. As prayed, four weeks time is granted to the learned counsel for the applicant to file case law.

3. List for hearing on 12.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 961 of 2024 with MA No.1054 of 2024

Ex Rect Suresh Kumar Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ashok Singh, Advocate Shri Ankur Rawat, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ashok Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant has filed amendment application.

3. Registry is directed to show amendment application in future cause list.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks time to file objection against amendment application.

5. On the next date of listing, delay condonation application shall also be heard.

6. List for further order on 17.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 128 of 2025

Ex Sub Balendra Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Virat Anand Singh, Advocate Shri Narendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Veer Raghav Chaubey, Advocate holding brief of Shri Virat Anand Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Brief holder to learned counsel for the applicant prays for adjournment of the case. Accordingly, the case is adjourned for the day.

3. List for hearing on 15.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

TA No. 66 of 2023 Rajpal Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Veer Raghav Chaubey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Gyan Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Veer Raghav Chaubey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court. Shri Gyan Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not available, however, Departmental Representative is present.

2. List this case for physical final hearing on 15.02.2027.

SB

ORDER SHEET

TA No. 09 of 2026

Sgt (MACP) Umesh Singh (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rahul Pal, Advocate Shri Tatsat Shukla, Advocate Shri Dhiraj Kumar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Tatsat Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through virtual mode and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the court.

2. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Transferred Application is allowed.

4. Detailed order is placed on separate sheets.

5. Misc. Application(s), pending if any, shall stand disposed of.

SB