Daily order sheet, C2, 29 Sep 2026 on 29 September 2026

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name shall be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Veer Raghav Chaubey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are physically present. M.A. No. 1155 of 2026.

3. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing Original Application. The delay condonation is supported with affidavit. There is delay of 02 months and 20 days in filing the Original Application.

4. Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that delay in filing of Original Application is not deliberate, but on account of reasons stated in affidavit filed in support of application.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents has no objection.

6. Heard, Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we find that cause shown in affidavit is sufficient.

8. Accordingly, delay in filing the Original Application is condoned. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 959 of 2026.

9. This original application has been filed by the father of deceased Abhishek Kumar for grant of Special Family Pension which needs adjudication.

10. Admit.

11. Ld. Counsel for the respondents raised preliminary objection that wife of the deceased Abhishek Kumar is the necessary Party who has not impleaded in the present O.A..

12. Ld. Counsel for the applicant is hereby directed to implead wife of the Late Abhishek Kumar as necessary party in array of the O.A. before the next date of listing. Thereafter, counter and rejoinder affidavits will be exchanged by the party.

13. List on 11.12.2026.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Supl. No. 7) O.A. No. 962 of 2026 with M.A. No. 1160 of 2026

Col Abhaya Prakash (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Bihari Lal Verma and Shri Rahul Pal,

Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name shall be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Bihari Lal Verma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is virtually present and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. counsel for the respondents is physically present. M.A. No. 1160 of 2026.

3. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing Original Application. The delay condonation is supported with affidavit. There is delay of 08 years, 09 months and 07 days in filing the Original Application.

4. Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that delay in filing of Original Application is not deliberate, but on account of reasons stated in affidavit filed in support of application.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents has no objection.

6. Heard, Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we find that cause shown in affidavit is sufficient.

8. Accordingly, delay in filing the Original Application is condoned. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 962 of 2026.

9. Matter pertains to grant of pensionary benefits to the applicant which needs adjudication.

10. Admit.

11. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks time to file Counter Affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed by the applicant within two weeks, thereafter.

12. List on 11.01.2027.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Supl. No. 8) O.A. No. 963 of 2026 with M.A. No. 1161 of 2026

Col Arvind Kumar Pandey (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Bihari Lal Verma and Shri Rahul Pal,

Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Dr. SN Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Dr. SN Pandey, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name shall be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Bihari Lal Verma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is virtually present and Dr. SN Pandey, Ld. counsel for the respondents is physically present.

3. Heard the Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There has been delay for more than 08 years, 09 months and 07 days in filing this Original Application. Delay Condonation Application has been filed by the applicant.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted four weeks time to file objection against delay condonation application. M.A. No. 1161 of 2026.

3. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing Original Application. The delay condonation is supported with affidavit. There is delay of 08 years, 09 months and 07 days in filing the Original Application.

4. Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that delay in filing of Original Application is not deliberate, but on account of reasons stated in affidavit filed in support of application.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents has no objection.

6. Heard, Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we find that cause shown in affidavit is sufficient.

8. Accordingly, delay in filing the Original Application is condoned. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 963 of 2026.

9. Matter pertains to grant of pensionary benefits to the applicant which needs adjudication.

10. Admit.

11. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks time to file Counter Affidavit. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed by the applicant within two weeks, thereafter.

12. List on 11.01.2027.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Supl. No. 9)

O.A. No. 969 of 2026 with M.A. No. 1173 of 2026

Jayswal Milan Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Shri Saurabh Yadav,

Ms. Alka Saksena, Shri Yashpal Singh Yadav

and Shri Surendra Kumar, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name shall be shown as counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is physically present and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is virtually present.

3. Heard the Ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that due to typographical error in the present O.A., he want to withdraw this original application with liberty file afresh.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents has no objection.

6. As prayed by Ld. Counsel for the applicant, this original application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Supl. No. 10)

EX.-A. No. 306 of 2026 Inre O.A. No. 7 of 2024

Shiv Kumar S/o Ex Hav Late Kanhiya Lal Yadav

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Anuj Sharma, Advocate holding brief of Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is physically present and Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is virtually present.

2. The fresh Execution Application has been filed by the applicant for non- implementation of Tribunal Order dated 24.04.2026 passed in O.A. No.7 of 2024.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and allowed four weeks’ time to seek instructions and to file compliance affidavit.

4. List on 08.02.2027.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Supl. No. 11)

M.A. No. 1153 of 2026 Inre T.A. No. 24 of 2026

Lt Col Manish Baunthiyal

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Yashpal Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Yashpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present. M.A. No. 1153 of 2026.

2. This early hearing Application has been filed by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant with a prayer to prepone the date of hearing since on last date i.e. 11.09.2026 the Bench was not available and the case has been fixed for hearing on 05.03.2027. Ld. Counsel for the applicant further submitted that he has moved an amendment application, copy duly served upon Ld. Counsel for the respondents, is available in file and the case has not yet ripe for hearing, therefore, this early hearing application is filed.

3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as mentioned in the early hearing application, the early hearing application is allowed and now the case is preponed for hearing on 12.01.2027.

4. Accordingly, aforesaid M.A. is disposed off.

5. On next date of listing, applicant shall address the amendment application.

6. Ld. Counsel for the respondents may file objection against amendment application.

7. List on 12.01.2027 for hearing on amendment application.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 1)

EX-A. No. 236 of 2023 Inre O.A. No. 337 of 2022

Ex JWO Santosh Sharma

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri R Chandra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, HFO RC Shukla(Retd), Advocate holding brief of the Shri R Chandra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is physically present and Shri Amit Jaiswal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is virtually present.

2. Objection against compliance affidavit has not been filed so far.

3. Proxy counsel seeks and allowed time, as last opportunity, to file objection if any, against compliance affidavit before the next date fixed failing which the matter be treated as fully complied with and shall be disposed of.

4. List on 08.02.2027.

Member (A) Member (J) Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 2)

EX.A. No. 354 of 2024 Inre O.A. No. 682 of 2022

Ex Cpl Arun Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Wg Cdr SN Dwivedi (Retd), Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Rajiv Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Wg Cdr SN Dwivedi (Retd), Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajiv Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that as per order dated 12.05.2026, Undertaking has not yet been provided by the applicant for provisionally compliance the order of the Tribunal dated 04.10.2023 passed in O.A. No. 682 of 2022.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant is hereby directed to provide Undertaking immediately from the applicant as directed by the Bench vide order dated 12.05.2026 with copy to Legal Representative for necessary compliance.

5. List on 09.02.2027.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 3)

O.A. No. 315 of 2022

Smt Seema Pandey, W/o Late Hav Hemant Kumar Pandey Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Alok Kumar Mishra and

Mohd. Zafar Khan, Advocates Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Anuj Sharma, Advocate holding brief of Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are physically present.

2. Today, this case is listed for filing of Supplementary Rejoinder Affidavit by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant which has not yet been filed so far.

3. Proxy Counsel submits that he is not inclined to file Supplementary Rejoinder affidavit.

4. Now, pleadings are complete.

5. List 15.03.2027 for physical final hearing.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 4)

O.A. No. 1230 of 2023

Ex Sub (Nur Tech) Kailash Chandra Bhatt

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KKS Bisht, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Lt Gen Anil Puri, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Maj SM Mustafa(Retd), Advocate holding brief of Shri KKS Bisht, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are physically present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that Parawise comments for preparation of Supplementary Counter Affidavit have not been received from the AMC Records, Lucknow. Therefore, AMC Records, Lucknow is hereby directed to provide Parawise Comments to the Ld. Counsel for the respondents, immediately.

3. Copy of this order be provided to the Legal Representative for necessary compliance.

4. List on 30.11.2026.

(Lt Gen Anil Puri) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta)

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 5)

O.A. No. 1485 of 2023

Smt. Gani Magarni Alias Ganisara Rana

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey and

Shri T.K. Shukla Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, none appears on behalf of the applicant. Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is pysically present.

2. Today, this case is listed for filing of rejoinder affidavit as well as translated copy of page No. 25 of the O.A. but neither the Rejoinder Affidavit as well as Translated coy of page No 25 of the O.A. has been filed nor Ld. Counsel for the applicant present, today.

3. In such circumstances, last opportunity is granted to Ld. Counsel for the applicant to file Rejoinder Affidavit as well as translated copy of Page No. 25 of the O.A. by next date fixed failing which the case shall be dismissed.

4. List on 25.01.2027.

Rpm/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 6)

O.A. No. 584 of 2024

Hav/Hony Nb Sub Ram Prakash Singh

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi and

Shri Anshuman Srivastava, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Anuj Sharma proxy for Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing..

2. Learned counsel for applicant is not inclined to file Rejoinder Affidavit

3. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

4. Order passed on separate sheet of paper

Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 7)

O.A. No. 589 of 2024

Ex WO Gajendra Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vinay Pandey,

Shri Shashi Kant Chaturvedi, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Anurag Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Vinay Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Anurag Mishra, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court.

2. Counsel for applicant seeks some more time to file Rejoinder Reply. Time as prayed is allowed

3. List on 25.01.2027.

(Maj Gen Sanjay Singh) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta) Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 8)

O.A. No. 643 of 2025

MWO Ram Karan Yadav (Retd)

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Chandan Kumar Pandey, Ms. Upasna

Mishra, Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Shri Pradeep

Kumar Mishra, Shri Yogesh Kumar Mishra and

Shri Navneet Yadav,Advocates

Versus Union of India &Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present through video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that Counter Reply is ready and the same is duly received by the learned counsel for the applicant. Ld. Counsel for respondent may file C.A. before the registry during the course of day.

3. Ld. Counsel for applicant is not inclined to file Rejoinder Reply.

4. Pleadings of the case is complete

5. List on 15.03.2027 for physical final hearing .

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 9)

O.A. No. 676 of 2025 with M.A. 684 of 2026

Sub (ORA) Sayyad Abdul Ahmad (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : HFO Ramesh Chandra Shukla (Retd) and Shri

Mahendra Kumar Singh, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, HFO Ramesh Chandra Shukla (Retd), Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court.

2. M.A. No. 684/2026:

This M.A. has been moved by the learned counsel for the applicant for amendment in the O.A. Following amendment has been sought by the applicant :

Add Sub para (c) under para 8(b) as “Quash orders of recoveries of Rs. 12615/- and 38324/- made from the pay of the applicant vide statement of Accounts for 02/2020 and 11/2024 respectively, just 6 months prior to discharge from service without any prior notice and direct respondents to refund the same with penal interest @ 12% per annum.”

3. Learned counsel for respondents have no objection and submitted that amendment will not change the nature of the O.A.

4. Amendment is allowed. M.A. No.684/2026 stands disposed off.

5. Ld. Counsel for applicant is directed to incorporate the amendment within 15 days.

6. Counsel for applicant submitted that during the course of day, he will file Rejoinder Reply, copy of which has already been received by the learned counsel for the respondents. List on 16.03.2027 for physical hearing.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 10)

O.A. No. 747 of 2025

Smt Ganga Devi W/o Ex Hav (Late) Nanda Bahadur Roka Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Maj SM Mustafa (Retd), Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Mrs. Kavita Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Maj SM Mustafa (Retd), Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Mrs. Kavita Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents,both are present before the court.

2. Counter Affidavit and Supple.Counter Affidavit filed by respondents is taken on record.

3. Counsel for applicant has also filed Rejoinder Reply, which is also taken on record.

4. Now the pleadings are complete

5. List on 16.03.2027 for final physical hearing.

Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 11)

O.A. No. 937 of 2025 with M.A. No. 1086 of 2025

Ex Hony Nb Sub Arun Kumar Singh

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ashok Kumar, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Mrs. Anju Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Ashok Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Mrs. Anju Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present through video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for respondents has filed objection against maintainability of the O.A. as well as condonation of delay and submitted that learned counsel for applicant has not properly explained the delay. It is further submitted that relief claimed by the applicant has already been settled by the larger bench of AFT (Principal Bench).

3. In this circumstances, cause shown is sufficient to condone the delay. Delay is condoned. M.A. NO. 1086/2025 stands disposed off.

4. Counsel for respondents may file Counter Affidavit within 4 weeks. Rejoinder Reply may be filed within 02 weeks thereafter.

5. List on 25.01.2027.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 12)

O.A. No. 1058 of 2025

Ex HFO Ram Avtar Sharma

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Amit Pandey, Shri Shiv Kant Pandey and

Shri Nisha Pandey, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Sunil Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Amit Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing. None appeared on behalf of the respondents.

2. Legal representative apprises that till today complete comments is not received by the respondents and seeks time to file Counter Reply. Time as prayed is allowed.

3. List on 25.01.2027.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 13)

O.A. No. 1119 of 2025

Ex Hony Nb Sub Jwala Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Shri Saurabh Yadav

and Shri Alka Saksena, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Smt. Alka Saxena, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court.

2. Learned counsel for respondents submitted that Counter reply is ready and the same will be filed during the course of day.

3. Ld. Counsel for applicant submitted that she has also received counter affidavit and Rejoinder Reply is prepared.

4. Counter Affidavit and Rejoinder Affidavit be filed with the registry during the course of day.

5. Learned counsel for respondents submitted that Bank is necessary party in the O.A. and applicant has not impleaded bank in the O.A.

6. Learned counsel for applicant is hereby directed to take steps to implead bank as necessary party within 7 days.

7. List on 25.01.2027.

Member (A) Member (J) HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 14)

O.A. No. 123 of 2026

Ex Sub/Clk (SD) Debashish Bhattacharya

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KP Datta, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Preeti Mala, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri KP Datta, Ld. Counsel for the applicants and Ms. Preeti Mala, Ld. counsel for the respondents, both are present before the court.

2. Rejoinder Reply filed by the learned counsel for applicant is taken on record. Now pleadings are complete.

3. List on 16.03.2027 for final physical hearing.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No.2 (Sl. No. 15)

O.A. No. 570 of 2026 Nk/JEE(E/M) Imran Ansari

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vinay Pandey and

Shri Shashi Kant Chaturvedi, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Sunil Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Umesh Chandra Sharma, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Vinay Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the court. None present for the respondents.

2. Legal representative seeks time to file Counter Affidavit. Time as prayed is allowed.

3. List on 01.02.2027.

(Maj Gen Sanjay Singh) (Justice Umesh Chandra Sharma)

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Sl. No. 16)

O.A. No. 718 of 2026 with M.A. No. 867 of 2026 Inre: T.A. No. 35 of 2023 (Decided)

Smt. Seema Devi W/o Late Sanjiv Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rahul Dev Tripathi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the applicant, however, Sri Yaspal Singh Advocate is present before the court to assist the court. Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Learned counsel for respondents submitted that T.A. No. 35 of 2023 has already been decided by this Tribunal on 25th September 2025, so this O.A. cannot be filed before this Tribunal and only the Review Application is maintainable.

3. Accordingly, O.A.718/2026 is dismissed. The applicant is at liberty to file Review Application if so advised. Pending M.As, if any, also stand disposed off.

HLS/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Ser No. 17)

O.A. No. 797 of 2021

Ex Hony Nb Sub Ramesh Singh Chauhan

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Ashish Kumar Singh and Shri Avdhesh Shukla, Advocates Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Advocate on behalf of the applicant is taken on record. His name shall be shown in the cause list when the case is listed.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondent No 1-4 are present. Shri Avdhesh Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the respondent No 5-6 is not present.

3. Today this case is listed for filing reply of respondent No 5-6 but learned counsel for the respondent No 5-6 is not available.

4. In the interest of justice, the case is passed over for the day.

5. List on 29.03.2027 for physical final hearing.

Member (A) Member (J) rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Ser No. 18)

O.A. No. 633 of 2023

Ex Cpl Manoj Kumar

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Abhishek Singh and Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present in Court and Dr. Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through virtual mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has put his arguments at length. He is is directed to file written points of arguments by the next date fixed.

4. For arguments on behalf of the respondents, list on 04.01.2027 for physical final hearing.

Member (A) Member (J) rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Ser No. 19)

O.A. No. 169 of 2024

Smt Rajani Devi W/o L/Nk (late) Dharmendra Singh

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KK Misra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri KK Misra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Arguments concluded.

4. For orders, see our judgment and order of date passed on separate sheets.

Member (A) Member (J) rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Ser No. 20)

O.A. No. 698 of 2025

Suman Devi Kashyap D/o late H/Nb Sub Radhey Shyam Kashyap

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Shri Saurabh Yadav and Ms Alka Saksena, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Ms Alka Saksena, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Rejoinder affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant is taken on record.

4. Arguments concluded.

5. Order reserved.

Member (A) Member (J) rathore

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW

Court No. 2(Ser No. 21)

O.A. No. 866 of 2025

Archna Chouhan D/o late Nk Brijendra Singh Chauhan

Applicant

By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pushpendra Kumar Dhaka and Shri Rama Kant, Advocates

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents: Ms Appoli Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta, Member (J) Hon’ble Maj Gen Sanjay Singh, Member (A)

1. On the case being taken up for hearing, Shri Pushpendra Kumar Dhaka, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Ms Appoli Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Due to paucity of time, the case could not be taken up for hearing.

3. List on 09.02.2027 for physical final hearing.

(Maj Gen Sanjay Singh) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta) Member (A) Member (J) rathore