Armed Forces Tribunal

Mukesh Pal vs Union of India on 26 October 2026

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH CHANDIGARH

AT CHANDIMANDIR

-.-

OA 959 of 2026

Monday, the 26th day of Oct, 2026

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL, MEMBER (J)

HON'BLE LT GEN (DR) RANBIR SINGH, MEMBER (A)

Mukesh Pal

…… Applicant

(By Col AK Sharma (Retd), Advocate)

Versus

Union of India and others

…… Respondents

(By None)

-.-

ORDER

The applicant was discharged on completion of service limit on 29.02.2024. He was in a permanent low medical category on account of disability of ‘Recurrent and Persistent Hematuria Other’, the extent of which was assessed to be 60% for life but neither attributable to nor aggravated by military service. The assessment was made by reference to Guide to Medical Officers (Military Pensions), 2023. Claim for grant of disability element was rejected because the disability was assessed to be neither attributable to nor aggravated by military service.

Learned counsel for the applicant prays for time to argue the case.

Adjourned to 14.04.2027.

(Lt Gen (Dr) Ranbir Singh)

(Justice Sudhir Mittal) Member (A)

Member (J)

26th Oct, 2026 ‘b’

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead