Daily order sheet, C1, 27 Oct 2026 on 27 October 2026

1. List revised.

2. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

3. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajeev Narayan Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present. M.A. No. 1253 of 2026

4. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

5. There is delay of 04 months and 19 days in filing of Original Application. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application. Cause of delay shown in the affidavit annexed with the delay condonation application are sufficient to condone the delay. Delay is condoned.

6. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 1042 of 2026

7. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

8. Case needs adjudication.

9. Admit.

10. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

(Vice Admiral Atul Kumar Jain) (Justice Suresh Kumar Gupta) Member (A) Member (J) RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 2) OA No. 1043 of 2026 with MA No. 1254 of 2026

Ex Hav (ORA) Chougule Kailash Tukaram

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate

Shri Saurabh Yadav, Advocate Shri Surendra Kumar, Advocate Shri Yashpal Singh Yadav, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present. M.A. No. 1254 of 2026

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. There is a delay of 01 month and 16 days in filing of Original Application. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application.

5. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that the delay in filing of the application is not deliberate but of the reasons stated in affidavit filed in support of delay condonation application.

6. Ld. Counsel for the respondents vehemently opposed the submission of the applicant’s counsel and submits that delay has not been properly and satisfactorily explained on day-to-day basis.

7. We have considered the submissions of Ld. Counsel for the parties and we find that the cause shown for the delay is sufficient. Further being pensionary matter and in view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Union of India and Others Vs. Tarsem Singh (2008

(8) SCC 646), delay is condoned.

8. Delay condonation application stands disposed off.

9. Ld. Counsel for the respondents further raised objection with regard to maintainability of the O.A and submitted that the applicant is resident of State of Maharashtra and no such document is annexed indicating that applicant is resident of territorial jurisdiction of this Tribunal to which the applicant’s counsel stated that applicant’s Record office is AMC Record Lucknow which is well within the territorial jurisdiction of this Bench. O.A. No. 1043 of 2026

10. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

11. Case needs adjudication.

12. Admit.

13. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 3)

Ex-A. No. 339 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 675 of 2023

Ex L/NK Jainath Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate

Shri Saurabh Yadav, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. This is a fresh execution application filed for implementation of order dated 11.12.2025 of this Tribunal passed in Original Application No. 675 of 2023.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks time to seek instructions and to file affidavit of compliance of the order of this Tribunal.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 4)

Ex-A.No. 341 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 364 of 2025

Col. Dharmendra Yadav (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate

Shri Saurabh Yadav, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Saurabh Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. This is a fresh execution application filed for implementation of order dated 12.02.2026 of this Tribunal passed in Original Application No. 364 of 2025.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks time to seek instructions and to file affidavit of compliance of the order of this Tribunal.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 5)

Ex-A. No. 342 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 242 of 2024

Ex HFO Ravi Prakash Pandey

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. This is a fresh execution application filed for implementation of order dated 08.05.2025 of this Tribunal passed in Original Application No. 242 of 2024.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks time to seek instructions and to file affidavit of compliance of the order of this Tribunal.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 6)

Ex-A. No. 343 of 2026 Inre: OA No. 874 of 2023

Ex L/NK Manmohan Ray (DSC)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate Shri Saurabh Yadav, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri JN Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Memo of Appearance filed by Shri JN Mishra, Advocate on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. His name be shown as Counsel for the respondents when the case is listed next.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri JN Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Heard the ld. Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. This is a fresh execution application filed for implementation of order dated 23.12.2025 of this Tribunal passed in Original Application No. 874 of 2023.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed four weeks time to seek instructions and to file affidavit of compliance of the order of this Tribunal.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Suppl. No. 7)

Ex-A. No. 239 of 2022 Inre: OA No. 618 of 2021

Ex Hav Sanjai Yadav

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri VP Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Devesh Kumar, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri VP Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Devesh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that writ petition filed on behalf of UoI is duly dismissed on 17.04.2026, more than six months have already passed but till date order has not been complied with. Presently no SLP is pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court.

5. In these circumstances, there is no other option, ADG-PS, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order.

6. Respondents are also directed to deposit all the cost due against them by the next date of listing.

8. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

9. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of ADG-PS.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 322 of 2022 Inre: OA No. 827 of 2021 Ex Nb Sub Sheo Khelawan

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Dharam Raj Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. List revised.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Dharam Raj Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing. Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court. Departmental Representative is also present for the respondents.

3. Heard the parties and perused the records.

4. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

5. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submitted that he has already filed undertaking one year back and due to inaction of the respondents Rs. 76,000/- cost has already been imposed on the respondents but compliance has not been done.

6. In pursuance of the order dated 03.07.2026, representative of ADG-PS, Col PS is present virtually and submitted that provisional compliance is under process.

7. In these circumstances, there is no other option, ADG-PS, IHQ, MoD shall be present physically before this Tribunal on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order and also file his personal affidavit and also explain as to why contempt proceedings u/s 19(1) of AFT Act 2007 and Section 25 of AFT (Procedure) Rules 2008 be not initiated against him.

8. Respondents are also directed to deposit all the cost due against them by the next date of listing.

10. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

11. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of ADG-PS.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Court No. 1 (Sl. No.2)

Ex-A. No. 187 of 2023 Inre: OA No. 604 of 2021 Ex Hav Ram Shankar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Parijaat Bealura, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. List revised.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Parijaat Belaura, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that order was passed on 04.11.2022 but till date compliance has not been done.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that due to some typographical errors, compliance could not be made. He moved an application for necessary correction in the judgement dated 04.11.2022. He submitted that correction in the date(s) mentioned in the order be corrected as per details below: Sl. No.

(I) Para No. of Judgement dt. 04.11.2022 (II) Mentioned as (Incorrect date) (III) Read as (Correct date) (IV)

Para 05 31.07.2009 31.03.2009 01.08.2009 01.04.2009

Para 09 01.08.2009 01.04.2009

Para 11 31.07.2009 31.03.2009 01.08.2009 01.04.2009

Para 12 31.07.2009 31.03.2009

Para 13 01.08.2009 01.04.2009

Para 14 (a) 31.07.2009 31.03.2009 Para 14 (b) 01.08.2009 01.04.2009 Para 14 (c ) 31.07.2009 31.03.2009 Para 14 (d) 01.08.2009 01.04.2009 Para 14 (e) 01.08.2009 01.04.2009

5. Perusal of the file and judgement reveals that it is a typographical error, hence, correction is allowed. The dates in the judgement be read as per column (IV) mentioned in para 4 above. Necessary correction has been incorporated in the judgement dated 04.11.2022.

6. Registry is directed to provide the corrected copy of the judgement to the ld. Counsel for the parties.

7. The above amendment be part and parcel of judgement dated 04.11.2022.

8. Respondents are directed to comply the order in letter and spirit as the matter is very old one.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 85 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 100 of 2024

Ex JWO Satish Kumar Singh Chauhan

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : In Person

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing the applicant present in person and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is also present before the Court.

2. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that writ petition filed by the respondents is still pending and in pursuance of the order dated 08.05.2026, the applicant has not filed his undertaking till date, so compliance could not be done.

4. Applicant is directed to file his undertaking on affidavit to the respondents. If he files affidavit, it is expected that respondents shall comply the order as directed earlier by this Bench vide order dated 08.05.2026.

5. List on 12.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 120 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 49 of 2023 WO Suresh Chand Sharma (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri AK Chaudhary, Advocate

Shri Raj Kumara Mishra, Advocate

Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Preeti Mala, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri RK Mishra holding brief for Shri AK Chaudhary, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court. Ms. Preeti Mala, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is not present today. Departmental Representative is present for the respondents.

2. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Departmental Representative submits that undertaking from the applicant has not been received till date.

4. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that he shall provide copy of undertaking to the Departmental Representative for expedite the case.

5. List on 13.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 128 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 1397 of 2023

POELA (R) Ankit Thapa (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri Kaushik Chatterjee, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

2. Compliance affidavit filed by the respondents is taken on record.

3. By means of compliance affidavit, ld. Counsel for the respondents submitted that compliance has been made. PPO has been issued on 13.04.2026.

4. Since applicant’s counsel is not present today, he may file objection, if any, till the next date of listing.

5. List on 25.11.2026.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 143 of 2025 Inre: TA No. 23 of 2024

Air CMDE Shashi Kant Mishra VM (G) F (P) (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri SN Dwivedi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri RC Shukla holding brief for Shri SN Dwivedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that undertaking of the applicant has been received and compliance is under process. He prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 304 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 295 of 2023 Ex Sgt Ramakanta Sahoo

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicants : Rakesh Kumar Yadav, Advocate

Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Adesh Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that Writ Petition has already been filed assailing the order of this Tribunal before the Hon’ble High Court in which stay order has been passed which is still good and effective.

5. Since there is stay order in the matter, list this case on 13.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 306 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 126 of 2024

Ex Sgt Bramha Nand Gupta

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Sandeep Tripathi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Sandeep Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. In this case, the O.A was decided on 10.03.2025. More than one and half years have already passed, neither any writ petition has been filed by the respondents nor order has been complied with. Matter has already been settled by the Hon’ble Apex Court.

5. In these circumstances, there is no other option, PD-DAV, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order.

6. Respondents are also directed to deposit all the cost due against them by the next date of listing.

8. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

9. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of PD-DAV.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 429 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 1509 of 2023

Ex Sub Rajesh Kumar Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that compliance is under process. He prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 430 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 724 of 2023

Ex L/NK Har Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri VP Pandey, Advocate

Shri Deepak Bhatt, Advocate

Shri RK Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Deepti Prasad Bajpai, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. List revised.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri VP Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court. Ms. Deepti Prasad Bajpai, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that writ petition is proposed to be filed against the order of this Bench before the Hon’ble High Court but till today neither any writ petition has been filed by the respondents nor order has been complied with.

6. In these circumstances, there is no other option, ADG-PS, IHQ, MoD shall be present before this Tribunal through virtual mode on the next date of listing to explain the cause of delay in implementation of the order dated 18.10.2024.

8. Copy of the order be provided to the respondents/Legal Cell for compliance of the order.

9. Meanwhile, if the order is complied with, there will be no need of personal appearance of ADG-PS.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 434 of 2025 Inre OA No. 473 of 2024

Ex Sub Bhavsar Indravardhan Bansilal

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KP Datta, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents :Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri KP Datta, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

4. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that case is pending before PIFA for their concurrence and compliance is under process. He prays for and is granted further four weeks’ time to comply the order and file compliance affidavit.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

Ex-A. No. 436 of 2025 Inre: OA No. 828 of 2024

MWO (HFO) Umakant Tripathi (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. List revised.

2. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi on behalf of the applicant is taken on record. Registry is directed to show his name as counsel for the applicant in the next cause list.

3. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

4. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

5. Compliance affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

6. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that Writ Petition has been filed assailing the order of this Tribunal before the Hon’ble High Court which is still pending but there is no stay order.

7. In these circumstances, respondents are directed to make compliance of the order provisionally subject to final outcome of the Writ Petition filed before the Hon’ble High Court after obtaining an undertaking on affidavit from the applicant to the effect that, in case, any adverse order is passed against him, he would return all the amount, if any, and comply with the order of the Hon’ble High Court passed in Writ Petition.

8. As prayed by learned counsel for the respondents four weeks further time is granted to comply the order provisionally and file provisional compliance affidavit.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1007 of 2024 Sub Maj Awadhesh Kumar Pandey (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Shri Yogesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Shri Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Ms. Upasna Mishra, Advocate

Shri Satya Narayan Mishra, Advocate

Shri Abhishek Pandey, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Raj Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Ld. Counsel for the applicant is not inclined to file rejoinder affidavit.

3. List for physical final hearing on 22.12.2026.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 09 of 2025 with MA No. 902 of 2026 with MA No. 07 of 2025 Ex Hav/ Opr & Dvr Kuldip Kumar Mishra

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Yogesh Kesarwani, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Yogesh Kesarwani,Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present. M.A. No. 07 of 2025

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. There is delay of 02 years 02 months and 29 days in filing of Original Application. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application. Cause of delay shown in the affidavit annexed with the delay condonation application are sufficient to condone the delay. Delay is condoned. O.A. No. 09 of 2025

4. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

5. Case needs adjudication.

6. Admit.

7. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

8. Ld. Counsel for the applicant also moved an amendment application and submitted that he wants to delete Prayer No. A and E. Deletion of prayer A and E will not change the nature of the case. Respondents’ counsel has no objection in this regard. Application is allowed. Applicant is permitted to delete the Prayer No. A and E.

9. MA Nos. 902/2026 and 07/2025 stand disposed of.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 72 of 2025

Ex Rect Dhanananjay Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Advocate

Shri Saurabh Yadav, Advocate

Ms. Alka Saxsena, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Namit Sharma, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Ravi Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court. Shri Namit Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing. Departmental Representative is also present for the respondents.

2. Counter affidavit filed by the respondents is taken on record. Copy is duly received by Shri KP Datta, Advocate on behalf of the applicant’s counsel.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant requested to post this matter for final hearing.

4. List for physical final hearing on 03.05.2027.

5. In the mean time, rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed by the applicant.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 877 of 2025

Sep Mali Ashok Dhanraj

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Ajit Kakkar, Advocate Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. Ld. Counsel for the applicant is not inclined to file rejoinder affidavit.

4. List for physical final hearing on 03.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 991 of 2025 Ex Hav Ranjit Kumar Upadhyay

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Girish Chandra Tripathi, Advocate

Shri Sunil Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Shri Krishan Kumar Singh, Advocate

Shri Indra Mani Tripathi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Girish Chandra Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Shyam Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

3. Rejoinder affidavit has also been filed by the applicant which is taken on record.

4. Pleadings are complete.

5. List for physical final hearing on 04.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1100 of 2025 Col Anshuman Vivek (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri SG Singh, Advocate

Shri Anand Kumar Yadav, Advocate

Shri Suyush Dwivedi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant Ms. Appoli Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted further four weeks time to file Counter Affidavit.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 1104 of 2025

Ex Nk Rama Shankar Tiwari

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Girish Chandra Tripathi, Advocate

Shri Sunil Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Shri Krishan Kumar Singh, Advocate

Shri Indra Mani Tripathi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Girish Chandra Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Ld. Counsel for the respondents apprised the Court that he is counsel on behalf of the UoI but the counter affidavit has been filed by Shri Gyan Singh without any authority and without getting any comment.

3. On perusal of the record, it reflects that counter affidavit is correct one. So counsel for the respondents seeks time to clarify this matter.

4. List on 16.11.2026.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 25 of 2026

Ex hav (MACP Nb /Sub) Trilok Chand

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Parijaat Belaura, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Parijaat Belarua, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted further four weeks time to file Counter Affidavit.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 26 of 2026

Ex Hav Rabinddra Nath Santra

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri KP Datta, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri KP Datta, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present before the Court and Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

3. Ld. Counsel for the respondents submits that counter affidavit is under preparation. He prays for and is granted further four weeks time to file Counter Affidavit.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 27 of 2026

JWO Mandhata (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Girish Chandra Tripathi, Advocate

Shri Sunil Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Shri Krishan Kumar Singh, Advocate

Shri Indra Mani Tripathi, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Pushpendra Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Girish Chandra Triapthi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Advocate appearing for the respondents submits that name of Shri Pushpendra Mishra is wrongly mentioned in the list. He has filed his memo in this case. Registry is directed to print his name as counsel for the respondents in the future cause list.

3. It is further submitted that due to typographical mistake name of Shri Pushpendra Mishra was mentioned in the earlier orders also. This order is part and parcel of earlier orders also.

4. Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents.

5. Ld. Counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted further four weeks time to file Counter Affidavit.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 608 of 2026 with MA No. 744 of 2026

Ex Nb Sub Akash Kumar

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Nishant Verma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Devesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Nishant Verma, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Devesh Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present. M.A. No. 744 of 2026

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. There is delay of 01 year 05 months and 28 days in filing of Original Application. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has filed delay condonation application. Cause of delay shown in the affidavit annexed with the delay condonation application are sufficient to condone the delay. Delay is condoned.

4. Delay condonation application stands disposed off. O.A. No. 608 of 2026

5. This original application has been filed for grant of disability element of disability pension. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the applicant that applicant’s claim has been wrongly rejected by the respondents.

6. Case needs adjudication.

7. Admit.

8. Ld. Counsel for the respondents seeks and is allowed four weeks’ time to file Counter Affidavit in the Registry after supplying a copy to the applicant’s counsel. Rejoinder Affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

TA No. 29 of 2023

Vijay Kumar Verma

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate

Shri Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing none is present for the applicant. Shri Shailendra Sharma Atal, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present through video conferencing.

2. List on 05.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 701 of 2024 Ex Dfr (MACP Nb Sub) Masta Ram

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Abhishek Singh, Advocate

Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Anurag Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Abhishek Singh, Ld. Counsel for the applicant is present through video conferencing and Shri Anurag Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents is present before the Court.

2. In this case, legality of GMO 2023 has been challenged by the applicant.

3. List on 26.05.2027.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 146 of 2025

Ex Hav (Hony Nb Sub) Gambhir Singh

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Rohitash Kumar Sharma, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Rohitash Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Alok Kumar Mishra, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. O.A is allowed.

4. Detailed order on separate sheets.

5. Misc. Application(s), if any, pending for disposal, shall be treated to have been disposed of.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 226 of 2025

Ex NK Bir Bahadur KC

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Shiv Kumar Saroj, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Shiv Kumar Saroj, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Arun Kumar Sahu, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

2. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. Order Reserved.

RK/-

ORDER SHEET

OA No. 324 of 2025

Sub Dhumal Ramdas Sakharam (Retd)

Applicant By Legal Practitioner for the Applicant : Shri Pankaj Kumar Shukla, Advocate Shri Ram Jivan Dixit, Advocate

Versus Union of India & Others

Respondents By Legal Practitioner for Respondents : Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Advocate Notes of the Registry

1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi on behalf of the applicant is taken on record. Registry is directed to show his name as counsel for the applicant in the next cause list.

2. On the case being taken up for hearing Shri Shantanu Kumar Chaturvedi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashish Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Heard the ld. counsel for the parties and perused the records.

4. O.A is allowed.

5. Detailed order on separate sheets.

6. Misc. Application(s), if any, pending for disposal, shall be treated to have been disposed of.

RK/-