Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/50106/2017 of LAXMI AND ANOTHER Vs U T CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS on 29 December 2017
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-50106-2017 Date of decision:- 29.12.2017 Laxmi and another .....Petitioners Versus U.T. Chandigarh and others .....Respondents **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU **** Present: Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate for the
CRM-M-50106-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
CRM-M-50106-2017Date of decision:- 29.12.2017
Laxmi and another
_ ....Petitioners
Versus
U.T. Chandigarh and others
.....Respondents
OK K
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICEKE MAHABIR SINGH SINDH
KOK
Present:Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Gupta, Advocatefor the petitioners.
++++
MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU_J.(QRAL)
Present petition has been filed praying for protection to thelife and liberty of the petitioners, in view of the marriage solemnized bythem against the wishes of respondent No. 4.
?DNotice of motion.
3On the asking of the Court, Mr. GS. Chahal, APP,Chandigarh accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. | to 3 and three copies of the petition have been supplied to him in the Court.
4The documents annexed by the petitioners including theAadhar Card and the Marriage Certificate shows that both are major andare present in Court also duly identified by their counsel. They apprehend CRM-M-50106-2017
danger to their life and liberty at the hands of respondent No.4..Therefore, respondent No.2 is directed to take care of life and liberty ofthe petitioners, as per law.
5.With the above direction, the petition stands disposed of.
onHowever, it is made clear that this order may not beconstrued as expression of an opinion on legality and validity of themarriage of the petitioners, 29.12.2017sonia gugnanl ( MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU)JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether reportable?
Yes/No
? Whether reasoned / speaking?
Yes/No