Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/10867/2023 on 29 December 2023
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.10867 of 2023 Decided on: 29.12.2023 Piyush Sharma & others … Petitioners. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents.
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? _____________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) After making his submissions for some time and faced with a query of the Court as to how a Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is maintainable in light of the relief prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the petition, with liberty to have access to such alternative remedy as available to the petitioner in law. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge December 29, 2023 (Rishi)
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. 2023:HHC:14702 ::: Downloaded on - 31/10/2026 14:25:42 :::CIS