Delhi High Court

ARB.P./1722/2026 of GENERAL MANAGER NORTHERN RAILWAY & ORS. Vs MR ATUL SINGH on 30 October 2026

$~13

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010460742026

+

ARB.P. 1722/2026 & I.A. 26589/2026

GENERAL MANAGER NORTHERN RAILWAY & ORS.

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr.

Syed

Abdul

Haseeb,

Advocate.

versus

MR ATUL SINGH

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Anupam Dwivedi and Mr.

Ashutosh Kumar, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

JUDGMENT(ORAL)

%

30.10.2026

1. Mr. Anupam Dwivedi enters appearance on behalf of the Respondent and submits that he has no objection to the appointment of the Arbitrator.

2. It is well settled that, while exercising jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Act, the scope of enquiry is confined to examining the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement1.

3. In the present case, there is no dispute with regard to the existence of a valid arbitration clause between the parties.

1 SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Krish Spinning 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1754

ARORA

Page 1 of 2

4. Further, the parties are ad idem with respect to the reference of the disputes to arbitration. In the aforesaid circumstances, this Court finds no impediment in appointing a Sole Arbitrator.

5. Accordingly, Mr. Abhinav Agrawal, Advocate (Mob. No. 8889299671) is appointed as a learned Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arisen between the parties. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall enter upon the reference within two weeks from today.

6. The learned Sole Arbitrator will proceed to the arbitration proceedings subject to furnishing requisite disclosures as required under Section 12(2) of the Act within two weeks of entering reference.

7. The arbitration shall be carried under the rules and aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre (“DIAC”). The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fees as per the Schedule of Fees maintained by the DIAC.

8. It shall be open to the parties to raise all pleas, including objection as to arbitrability and jurisdiction, before the learned Sole Arbitrator who shall decide the same in accordance with law.

9. It is clarified that the observations made herein are only for the purpose of deciding the present petition under Section 11 of the Act. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall adjudicate the disputes independently and on their own merits, uninfluenced by any observations contained in the present order.

ARORA

10. The Registry is directed to send a receipt of this order to Mr. Abhinav Agrawal, learned Arbitrator through all permissible modes including email.

11. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the above terms.

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J OCTOBER 30, 2026/pa

Signed By:PRAGYA ARORA

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead