Himachal Pradesh High Court

CWP/9008/2022 on 30 December 2022

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

CWP No.9008 of 2022 Decided on: 30th December, 2022 ______________________________________________________ Ram Krishan Thakur

....Petitioner

Versus High Court of Himachal Pradesh & anr. …Respondents _______________________________________________________

Coram

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice A. A. Sayed, Chief Justice The Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Sandeep K. Pandey, Advocate.

For the respondents: Mr. Peeyush Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

A. A. Sayed, Chief Justice (Oral)

The petitioner has filed the petition, seeking the following substantive reliefs: - “(i) That the impugned rejection dated 30.04.2019, Annexure P-5 and impugned final seniority list dated 06.05.219 (Annexure p-6) may kindly be quashed and set aside.

(ii) That the direction may kindly be issued to the respondent No.1 to re-draw/issue fresh seniority list of the cadre of Erstwhile Tribunal especially in the cadre of assistant Registrar, after promulgation of R&P Rules dated 13.01.2021 by reflecting the name of the petitioner above the name of respondent no.2 and consider him for

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. 2022:HHC:16628-DB ::: Downloaded on - 01/11/2026 04:13:51 :::CIS

promotion to the post of Deputy Registrar as and when the post falls vacant.”

2. Petitioner’s representation against the tentative seniority list was decided on 30.04.2019. Thereafter, the final seniority list, which is impugned in the present petition, was issued on 06.05.2019. The petitioner has filed the present petition only on 27.12.2022. There is no satisfactory explanation in the petition for delay of more than three and half years.

3. In the circumstances, the present petition is dismissed on the ground of delay and laches, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

(A.A. Sayed)

Chief Justice

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua) December 30, 2022

Judge R.Atal

High Court of H.P. 2022:HHC:16628-DB ::: Downloaded on - 01/11/2026 04:13:51 :::CIS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead