Himachal Pradesh High Court

COPC/232/2022 on 30 December 2022

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA COPC No. 232 of 2022. Decided on : 30

th December, 2022. Rajender Kumar ...Petitioner.

Versus Maneesh Garg & Others

....Respondents.

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Varun Chandel, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Addl. A.G. and Mr. Narender Thakur, Deputy Advocate General.

Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that he has received telephonical instructions from his client that the amount due to the petitioner has been received by him. In view of this, judgment passed by this Court stands complied with. Consequently, no further orders are required to be passed in this petition. Accordingly, the instant petition stands disposed of.

(Satyen Vaidya) Judge 30th December, 2022.

(jai)

1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. 2022:HHC:16556 ::: Downloaded on - 01/11/2026 04:14:09 :::CIS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead