Himachal Pradesh High Court

ARB.C/194/2022 on 30 December 2022

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Arbitration Case No.194 of 2022

Decided on: 30.12.2022 Veena Gupta ...Petitioner Versus Indian Oil Corporation & another ...Respondents

Coram

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.A. Sayed, Chief Justice Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.1. A.A. Sayed, Chief Justice

(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, if the occasion so arises. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty, as prayed. ( A.A. Sayed ) Chief Justice

December 30, 2022

(vt) High Court of H.P. 2022:HHC:16590 ::: Downloaded on - 01/11/2026 04:14:54 :::CIS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead