Himachal Pradesh High Court
CRMMO/985/2022 on 30 December 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Cr.MMO No. 985 of 2022. Decided on : 30
th December, 2022. Charandeep Singh Jolly ...Petitioner.
Versus C.B. Healthcare
....Respondent.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Anoop Verma and Mr. Rajesh Kumar Parmar, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Nemo.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition at this stage as by inadvertence composite petition has been filed assailing more than one order passed in different complaints. He submits that he will be filing separate petitions assailing the said orders. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file separate petitions, if so advised. It is, however, clarified that the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. 2022:HHC:16586 ::: Downloaded on - 01/11/2026 04:15:42 :::CIS
liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner by way of this order shall not be construed to have expression of any opinion on the merits of the claim of the petitioner. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge 30th December, 2022.
(jai) …2… High Court of H.P. 2022:HHC:16586 ::: Downloaded on - 01/11/2026 04:15:42 :::CIS