Himachal Pradesh High Court
CMPMO/661/2022 on 29 December 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CMPMO No. : 661 of 2022
Decided on : 29.12.2022 Sh. Tika Ram
.…Petitioner.
Versus
Sh. Bhupinder Singh
…Respondent.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. Ravinder Singh Chandel, Advocate.
For the respondent : Nemo.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral)
Petitioner has approached this Court against order dated 08.12.2022, passed by learned Rent Controller (2), Shimla in Case No. 3-2 of 16, 16/2022.
2. Despite number of opportunities granted to the petitioner at his request, he failed to file any objection in the execution petition filed by respondent herein. No error of jurisdiction has been pointed out in the impugned order. Even otherwise, there is no illegality or perversity in the order passed by learned Rent Controller (2), Shimla. Petitioner, herein, has suffered an eviction order. On
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
High Court of H.P. 2022:HHC:16513 ::: Downloaded on - 01/11/2026 04:17:54 :::CIS
receipt of notice of execution, he had the opportunity to file or raise any objection to the execution petition, in accordance with law. Evidently, he did not do so. Thereafter, as noticed above, petitioner sought adjournments for a couple of times and thereafter, also did not file any objection. Faced with the situation, impugned order was passed.
3. This Court while exercising jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has restrictive jurisdiction.
4. In the given facts of the case, I do not find any material to exercise such jurisdiction, accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(Satyen Vaidya) December 29, 2022
Judge (sushma) High Court of H.P. 2022:HHC:16513 ::: Downloaded on - 01/11/2026 04:17:54 :::CIS