Himachal Pradesh High Court
CRMMO/1192/2022 on 29 December 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MMO No.1192 of 2022
Decided on: 29.12.2022 Raj Kumar .…Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another …. Respondents.
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner : Mr.Rajesh Mandhotra, Advocate. For the Respondents : M/s Sumesh Raj, Dinesh Thakur, Sanjeev
Sood,
Additional
Advocates General, for respondent No.1State. Mr. Panku Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge
(Oral)
By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of FIR No.83 of 2019, dated 15.06.2019, registered under Sections 323, 324 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Dehra, District Kangra, H.P. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Additional Advocate General as also learned counsel for respondent No.2.
3. Respondent No.2, who is present in the Court, has been duly identified by Mr. Panku Chaudhary, learned counsel. His statement has also been independently recorded in the Court, wherein he has stated that he entered into a compromise with the petitioner/accused and he is not interested in pursuing the matter, which led to registration of FIR No.83 of 2019, dated 15.06.2019, registered under Sections 323, 324 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Dehra, District Kangra, H.P.
4. Learned Additional Advocate General has also very fairly submitted that the respondentState has no objection in case this petition is allowed and FIR in issue is quashed and set aside.
5. Accordingly, in view of above, this petition is allowed and FIR No.83 of 2019, dated 15.06.2019, registered under Sections 323, 324 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Dehra, District Kangra, H.P., as well as ensuing criminal proceedings, arising out of FIR No.83 of 2019, dated 15.06.2019, registered under Sections 323, 324 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Dehra, District Kangra, H.P., are quashed and set aside, taking into consideration the compromise entered between respondent No.2 and petitioner/accused and statement to this effect, made by respondent No.2 in this Court. Petition stands disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneously applications, if any.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge December 29, 2022 (Rishi)