Central Administrative Tribunal
D/o Post vs RAMCHANDRA C DHAVALE on 29 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI Order Sheet Item no.: 33 M.A./965/2026 (MUMBAI) [ EXTENSION OF TIME ] In O.A./284/2017 DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING M.A./964/2026 Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: 1 Order Dated: 29/10/2026 D/O POST Vs RAMCHANDRA C DHAVALE
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Ms. Sharanya Sinha - Applicants in MA (Original respondents)
For Respondent(s) Advocate : Shri D.N. Karande - Respondent in MA (Original Applicant) Order of The Tribunal MA No.964/2026: The present MA has been filed by the respondents in the OA seeking condonation of delay in filing the MA for extension of time. For the reasons stated therein, the delay is condoned and the MA is allowed.
2. MA No.965/2026: The present MA has been filed by the respondents seeking an extension of six months time from the date of filing of the present MA for compliance of the order of this Tribunal dated 18th December, 2025, to enable them to complete the administrative process and issue an appropriate order in compliance with the order dated 18th December, 2025 passed by this Tribunal.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since the applicant has retired from the service, therefore, now the authority to grant the relief is the President of India and, therefore, it is taking time. She, therefore, seeks extension of six months time from the date of filing of the application, which was filed on 07th September, 2026. ?Thus, in effect, she is seeking an extension of time till 06th February, 2027.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the applicant in the OA submits that the applicant is bedridden and, therefore, he needs immediate relief. However, since the respondents are implementing the order of the Tribunal, he submits that, at the most, extension up to 31st December 2026 can be granted.
5. We have considered the rival submissions of the parties.
6. ?We find it appropriate to extend the time for implementation of the order till 31st December 2026.
7. MA is allowed.
MR. UMESH GAJANKUSH Member (J) Mr. Shri Krishna Member (A) Deepti Munarshi ( )