Central Administrative Tribunal
kishor ramchanra dhas vs REVENUE on 27 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI Order Sheet Item no.: 21 O.A./286/2026 (MUMBAI) [ CHARGE SHEET ] Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: 9 Order Dated: 27/10/2026 KISHOR RAMCHANRA DHAS Vs REVENUE
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Shri R.G. Walia For Respondent(s) Advocate : Dr. Vinod Joshi Order of The Tribunal The applicant has filed rejoinder on 05.10.2026.
2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that he had sent the rejoinder to the respondents for their parawise comments and he has received the parawise comments yesterday and he needs three weeks time to submit his reply to the rejoinder.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the Inquiry Officer has already been appointed and if he proceeds with the enquiry, it will cause prejudice to the applicant. He, therefore, submits that the respondents may be given three weeks time to file reply to the rejoinder. However, the respondents should be directed not to proceed with the enquiry till the next date of hearing.
4. However, Dr. V.B. Joshi, learned counsel for the respondents submits that though the Inquiry Officer has been appointed, the enquiry has not proceeded so far. He further submits that in case the Inquiry Officer issues any notice to the applicant, the applicant may approach this Tribunal for the appropriate orders.
5. List the matter on 07.12.2026.
MR. UMESH GAJANKUSH Member (J) Mr. Shri Krishna Member (A) Ma Alphanso ( )