Central Administrative Tribunal
Shri Ajith Kumar B M vs RAILWAY BOARD on 27 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI Order Sheet Item no.: 14 O.A./530/2026 (MUMBAI) [ PENSIONARY BENEFITS ] [ SENIOR CITIZEN ] With M.A./1123/2026 DELETION OF R-1 Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: 6 Order Dated: 27/10/2026 SHRI AJITH KUMAR B M Vs RAILWAY BOARD
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. Joe D Souza a/w Mr. Samir Singh h/f Sarvahita Legal For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. Suresh Kumar Order of The Tribunal In this case, although reply has been filed by the respondents and on last occasion, the learned counsel for the applicant sought time to file rejoinder, which is not filed yet.
2. However, the learned counsel for the applicant pressing for Interim Relief to the extent of grant of Provisional Pension during the pendency of the present Original Application, in view of Rule 53 and 53(a) of the Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993. 2.1 It is further submitted that the aforesaid prayer of Provisional Pension is claimed against the Department of Railways (respondent no. 2 & 3).
3. I have heard Mr. Joe D Souza, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the Railways on Interim Relief.
4. Reserved for Orders. MR. UMESH GAJANKUSH Member (J)
Rashmi ( )