Himachal Pradesh High Court

ARB.C/116/2021 on 31 December 2021

2021:HHC:15573

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

ON THE 31st DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021

BEFORE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ,

CHIEF JUSTICE

ARBITRATION CASE No. 116 of 2021

Between:

M/S

S.B.

TRADING

COMPANY

THROUGH PARTNER SH. RAJESH

CHADHA,

R/O

COLLEGE

ROAD,

MANDI, DISTRICT MANDI, H.P.

…PETITIONER

(BY

SH.

SUMEET

RAJ

SHARMA,

ADVOCATE)

AND

1. STATE OF H.P. THROUGH PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY I&PH, HP SECRETARIAT,

CHOTTA SHIMLA, SHIMLA-6.

2. THE

EXECUTIVE

ENGINEER,

JALSHAKTI DIVISION NO. 2, KULLU

AT BHUNTAR, DISTT. KULLU (HP).

…RESPONDENTS

(BY

SH.

VIKAS

RATHORE,

ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL)

_____________________________________________________

This case coming on for orders this day, the Court delivered the following:

Page 1 of 3

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is before this Court in this petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, (for short ‘the Act’), seeking for appointment of an Arbitrator to resolve the dispute that has arisen between the parties.

2. It is the case of the petitioner-company that there was an agreement vide (Annexure P-2), between the petitioner and the respondents and accordingly a contract was entered into between the parties in respect of work “providing LWSS to PC Hub Chanoun, Tehsil Banjar, Distt. Kullu, HP (SH: providing and erection of pumping machinery)”. Certain disputes have arisen thereon. Clause 25 of the agreement provides for appointment of an Arbitrator.

3. Under Section 11(6) of the Act, the High Court, while considering any application under Section 11(6) thereof, must confine its examination only to the existence of an Arbitration agreement. Since the existence of an arbitration agreement has not been disputed by the respondent, this application deserves to be allowed and the dispute referred to arbitration.

4. Having considered the contentions of both sides, Shri M.D. Sharma, District & Sessions Judge (Retd.), R/o Gulab Kunj, Lower Kaithu (Annadel), Shimla-171 003, is appointed as an Arbitrator, after his disclosure in writing is obtained in terms of

Page 2 of 3

Section 11(8) of the Act and only after receipt thereof, shall his appointment, as an Arbitrator, come into force.

5. On his giving consent to arbitrate the dispute between the parties, as an Arbitrator, Shri M.D. Sharma, District & Sessions Judge (Retd.), shall enter into reference, and shall pass an award in accordance with law. Copy of this order be forwarded to the learned counsel for the parties, as also to the Arbitrator. The Arbitrator so appointed shall be entitled to fee as per 4th Schedule appended to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6. The arbitration case is disposed of accordingly, so also pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

( Mohammad Rafiq )

Chief Justice

December 31, 2021

(hemlata)

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead