Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPCT/609/2020 on 30 December 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
ON THE 30tht DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
CIVIL ORIGINAL PETITION CONTEMPT (TRIBUNAL) No. 609 OF 2020
Between:-
JANG BAHADUR SINGH, S/O
SH.MOHINDER SINGH, R/O VILLAGE AND
P.O. KHERIAN, TEHSIL DEHRA, DISTRICT
KANGRA, H.P.
…PETITIONER
(BY SH.RAJESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE.)
AND
KAMALDEEP SINGH (PRINCIPAL), DIET,
UNA AT DEHLAN, DISTRICT UNA, H.P.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SH. DINESH THAKUR, ADDITIONAL
ADVOCATE GENERAL.)
CIVIL ORIGINAL PETITION CONTEMPT (TRIBUNAL) No. 886 OF 2020
Between:-
JANG BAHADUR SINGH, S/O
SH.MOHINDER SINGH, R/O VILLAGE AND
P.O. KHERIAN, TEHSIL DEHRA, DISTRICT
KANGRA, H.P.
…PETITIONER
(BY SH.RAJESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE.)
AND
1. DR. AMARJEET K. SHARMA, DIRECTOR
OF HIGHER EDUCATION, HIMACHAL
PRADESH, SHIMLA.
2. DEVENDER
SINGH
CHAUHAN,
PRINCIPAL, DIET (UNA) AT DEHLAN,
H.P. DISTT. UNA.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SH. DINESH THAKUR, ADDITIONAL
ADVOCATE GENERAL.)
Whether approved for reporting?
This petition coming on for admission this day, the Court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record instructions dated 29.12.2021 alongwith certificate issued by the High Court of H.P. 2021:HHC:15507 ::: Downloaded on - 01/11/2026 15:07:17 :::CIS
COPCT Nos. 609 and 886 of 2020 2 Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Jambal Tehsil Dada Siba, District Kangra, H.P. whereby it has been certified that salary of petitioner Jang Bahadur Singh Lecturer in Biology w.e.f. 10.11.2018 to 20.12.2018 i.e. 41 days has been drawn on 4.10.2019 and 10.10.2019. It indicates that the absence of petitioner has been considered as a period on duty and, therefore, the said period has been counted towards the services rendered by the petitioner. Copy of instructions has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. In view of aforesaid, these Contempt Petitions are closed and disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for redressal of his grievance, if anything still survives.
(Vivek Singh Thakur), 30th December, 2021
Judge. (Keshav) High Court of H.P. 2021:HHC:15507 ::: Downloaded on - 01/11/2026 15:07:17 :::CIS