Himachal Pradesh High Court
CRMPM/2446/2021 on 30 December 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
ON THE 30th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION (MAIN) No. 2446 of 2021
Between:-
1. DHARMINDER SINGH, SON OF SHRI
RAM NATH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST
OFFICE MANPURA, TEHSIL BADDI,
DISTRICT SOLAN HP.
2. BHUPINDER SINGH, SON OF SHRI
RAM NATH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST
OFFICE MANPURA, TEHSIL BADDI,
DISTRICT SOLAN HP.
3. SHAYAM LAL SON OF SHRI
SANTOKH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST
OFFICE MANPURA, TEHSIL BADDI,
DISTRICT SOLAN HP.
4. CHANDAN THAKUR SON OF SHRI
JAGGA RAM, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST
OFFICE MANPURA, TEHSIL BADDI,
DISTRICT SOLAN HP.
5. SURAJ THAKUR SON OF SHRI
JAGGA RAM, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST
OFFICE MANPURA, TEHSIL BADDI,
DISTRICT SOLAN HP.
6. KRISHAN KUMAR, SON OF SHRI
JARNAIL SINGH, AGED ABOUT 24
YEARS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND
POST OFFICE MANPURA, TEHSIL
BADDI, DISTRICT SOLAN HP.
7. ABHISHEK THAKUR, SON OF SHRI
RANJEET SINGH, AGED ABOUT 27
YEARS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND
POST OFFICE MANPURA, TEHSIL
BADDI, DISTRICT SOLAN HP.
8. SAURAV THAKUR, SON OF SHRI
RAM PAL, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST
OFFICE MANPURA, TEHSIL BADDI,
DISTRICT SOLAN HP.
9. HITENDER SINGH, SON OF SHRI
KARNAIL SINGH, AGED ABOUT 25
YEARS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND
POST OFFICE MANPURA, TEHSIL
BADDI, DISTRICT SOLAN HP.
10 AJAY KUMAR SON OF SHRI
SHAYAM LAL AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST
OFFICE MANPURA, TEHSIL BADDI,
DISTRICT SOLAN HP.
11. SACHIN KAUSHIK, SON OF SHRI
DHARAM PAL, AGED ABOUT 23
YEARS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND
POST OFFICE MANPURA, TEHSIL
BADDI, DISTRICT SOLAN HP.
….PETITIONERS
(BY SH. VIRENDER SINGH CHAUHAN, SR. ADVOCATE WITH
MR.AJAY KUMAR CHAUHAN, ADVOCATE)
AND
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
...RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI DINESH THAKUR, ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL)
SH.NARENDER KUMAR, ADDITIONAL S.P. POLICE STATION
BADDI IS PRESENT IN PERSON)
Whether approved for reporting?
This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
Petitioners have approached this Court, invoking provisions of Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure (in short ‘Cr.PC’), seeking regular bail in case FIR No. 36 of 2021, dated 5.11.2021, registered under Sections 323, 325, 451, 147, 148, 149, 504 and 506 of Indian Penal Code and Section 3 (1) (r) of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities), Act, 1989 (in short ‘SC&ST Act) in Police Station Manpura, District Solan H.P.
Status report stands filed,it is stated that petitioners have joined the investigation and they have been interrogated. It has been further stated that during investigation, it has also been surfaced that petitioner No. 10 Ajay Kumar son of Shri Shayam Lal was not involved in the commission of offence.
3. As per status report, the Investigating Officer, present in Court, has submitted that investigation in present case is at the advanced stage and custodial interrogation of petitioners is not warranted at this stage and recovery is also complete in this case.
In view of above, the petitioners No. 1 to 9 and 11 are ordered to be released on bail, subject to their furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court within two weeks from today, subject to the following conditions:-
(i) That the petitioners shall make themselves available during the investigation as well as trial on each and every date as and when required;
(iii) That the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. They shall not, in any manner, try to overawe or influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses;
(iv) obstruct the smooth progress of the investigation as well as trial;
(v) That the petitioners shall not jump over the bail and shall inform, in writing, regarding change of address, land line number and/or mobile number, if any, in advance, to concerned Police Station;
(vi) That the petitioners shall not commit the offence similar to the offence to which they are accused or suspected or the commission of which they are suspected;
(vii) In the event of repetition of commission of offence, bail granted in present case shall be liable to be cancelled on taking appropriate
steps
by prosecution/police;
(viii) That the petitioners shall not leave India without prior permission of Court and they shall
also
inform
the Investigating
Officer/SHO concerned before leaving State of Himachal Pradesh.
(ix) That petitioners shall not misuse their liberty in any manner.
As no involvement of petitioner No. 10 is found, therefore, there is no need to furnish the bail bonds on his behalf.
It will be open to the prosecution to apply for imposing any such other or further condition on the petitioner as deemed necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice. It will also be open to the trial Court/Magistrate to impose any other or further condition on the petitioner as it may deem necessary in the interest of justice.
In case the petitioners violate any condition imposed upon him, his bail shall be liable to be cancelled.
In such eventuality, prosecution may approach the competent Court of law for cancellation of bail in accordance with law.
Learned trial Court is directed to comply with the directions issued by the High Court, vide communication No. HHC/VIG/Misc.Instructions/93-IV.7139 dated 18.3.2013.
Any observation made in this order shall not affect the merits of case in any manner and will strictly confine for the disposal of this bail application filed under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure 1973.
The petitioners are permitted to produce copy of order downloaded from the High Court website and the trial Court shall not insist for certified copy of the order, however, they may verify the order from the High Court website or otherwise.
Petition stands disposed of.
Dasti copy on usual terms.
December 30, 2021
(Vivek Singh Thakur)
(ms) Judge