Himachal Pradesh High Court

CWP/6398/2020 on 31 December 2020

2020:HHC:10398-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

CWP No.6398 of 2020

Decided on : 31.12.2020

Mahatam Chand

…Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. and another

…Respondents ___________________________________________

Coram

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dhananjay Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Dy. A.G. (through video conferencing)

Sureshwar Thakur, Judge (oral)

Page 1 of 2

The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent concerned to decide the representation, of, the petitioner, Annexure P-2, in accordance with law, within four weeks, and, after affording an opportunity of hearing to him. It is made clear that till the representation of the petitioner, is, decided by the competent authority, thereupto the station(s), mentioned in the apposite representation, shall be kept vacant. Also, the pending application(s), if any, are also disposed of.

Copy dasti.

(Sureshwar Thakur)

Judge

(Sandeep Sharma)

Judge December 31, 2020 Kalpana High Court of H.P. 2020:HHC:10398-DB ::: Downloaded on - 01/11/2026 23:46:35 :::CIS

High Court of H.P. 2020:HHC:10398-DB ::: Downloaded on - 01/11/2026 23:46:35 :::CIS

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead