Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/6359/2020 on 30 December 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA
CWP No.5432 of 2020 a/w connected matters Date of decision : 30.12.2020
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CWP No.5432/2020 Munit Kumar … Petitioner
Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation …Respondent
2. CWP No.5433/2020 Naseeb Singh … Petitioner
Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation …Respondent
3. CWP No.6353/2020 Raj Kumar … Petitioner
Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation …Respondent
4. CWP No.6354/2020 Shubham … Petitioner
Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation …Respondent
5. CWP No.6355/2020 Nishant Kumar … Petitioner
Versus
…2… Himachal Road Transport Corporation …Respondent
6. CWP No.6356/2020 Chand Kishore … Petitioner
Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another …Respondents
7. CWP No.6357/2020 Sushma Devi … Petitioner
Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation …Respondent
8. CWP No.6358/2020 Rajnish Kumar … Petitioner
Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation …Respondent
9. CWP No.6359/2020 Nitish Kumar … Petitioner
Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation …Respondent
10. CWP No.6360/2020 Nisha Devi … Petitioner
Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation …Respondent
11. CWP No.6363/2020 Satish Kumar … Petitioner
…3…
Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another …Respondents
12. CWP No.6364/2020 Praveen Kumar … Petitioner
Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another …Respondents
13. CWP No.6372/2020 Jagdish Chand … Petitioner
Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation …Respondent
14. CWP No.6373/2020 Jatinder Kumar … Petitioner
Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation …Respondent
15. CWP No.6374/2020 Satish Kumar … Petitioner
Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another …Respondents
16. CWP No.6375/2020 Deepak Kumar … Petitioner
Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation …Respondent
17. CWP No.6376/2020
…4… Ashok Kumar … Petitioner
Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another …Respondents
18. CWP No.6386/2020 Suman Lata … Petitioner
Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation …Respondent
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice L. Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra and Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocates for the respective petitioner(s). For the Respondents : Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Advocate for the
respondents in all the petitions, except CWP Nos.6363, 6376, 6374 and 6364 of 2020. Mr. V.B. Verma, Advocate, for the respondents in CWP Nos.6363, 6376, 6374 and 6364 of 2020. PROCEEDINGS CONVENED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge (oral) Learned counsel for both the parties, submit that the cases of the petitioner(s) are squarely covered by the judgment rendered by Hon’ble Supreme Court, in Civil Appeal Nos.1557-1564 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.16158-16165/2016), titled 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
…5… Himachal Road Transport Corporation versus Lekh Ram and others and pray that the instant writ petitions may be disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgment.
2. In view of the above submissions, we deem it proper to dispose of the present writ petitions with a direction to the petitioner(s) to make a detailed representation(s), if not already made, before the respondent-competent authority, highlighting the aforesaid judgment rendered by Hon’ble Supreme Court, within a period of one week from today. On making such representation(s) by the petitioner(s), the respondent-competent authority is directed to consider the same in light of the aforesaid judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court and take a conscious decision in the matter within three months thereafter. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(L. Narayana Swamy) Chief Justice
(Anoop Chitkara), Judge December 30, 2020 (KS)