Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/3990/2019 on 30 December 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 3990 of 2019-I
Date of Decision: December 30, 2019
Prem Lal ….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others. ...Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. H.S. Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. For the respondents : Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Addl. AG and M/s. J.S. Guleria, Yudhbir Singh Thakur & Raju Ram Rahi, Dy.AGs, for respondents/State.
Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge (Oral)
The petitioner, a Senior Assistant in the Department of Prosecution, has been transferred from the Office of District Attorney, H.P. Legal Cell, New Delhi to the office of District Attorney, Kinnaur at Rampur with immediate effect without TTA/Joining Time, vide impugned order Annexure P-1. 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. Mr. H.S. Rana, learned counsel representing the petitioner has stated at bar that the petitioner is no more interested to pursue this writ petition any further and is willing to obey the order of his transfer, Annexure P-1, however on payment of TTA and allowing Joining Time. Although the stand of the respondent/State is that he himself has sought his transfer from the Office of District Attorney, H.P. Legal Cell, New Delhi to the Office of District Attorney, Kinnaur at Rampur, yet the request for transfer made by the petitioner was later on withdrawn vide Annexure R-3 to the reply on 19.9.2019 i.e. well before 30.11.2019 the day when he was transferred vide impugned order Annexure P-1.
3. Therefore, there is no need to take note of all factual details and the points raised in this writ petition and the same is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to comply with the order of his transfer, Annexure P-1, on grant of TTA and Joining Time to him by the respondents by taking a decision in this regard within a week from today. The interim order shall continue till such decision is taken by the competent authority.
4. Application(s), if pending will also stand disposed of accordingly. Copy dasti.
(Dharam Chand Chaudhary), Judge. (Anoop Chitkara),
Judge. December 30 , 2019 (PK)