Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/4317/2019 on 30 December 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.4317 of 2019 Decided on: 30.12.2019 Monika Devi and another ....…......Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ........Respondents __________________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice L. Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Aditya Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General, with Mr. Adarsh Sharma and
Ms. Ritta
Goswami, Additional Advocate Generals, for respondents No.1 to 6/State. Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Advocate, for respondents No.7 and 8. ASI Krishan Lal, P.P. City, Rampur. __________________________________________________________ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge (Oral). The petitioners have approached this Court with the contentions that they have solemnized their marriage with each-other according to Hindu Rites and Customs on 17.10.2019. However, it is alleged that their 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
life and liberty is under threat and not safe in the hands of respondents No.7 & 8.
2. In compliance to the directions passed by this Court on 21.12.2019, the status report has been filed today in the Court by the Superintendent of Police, Shimla, through ASI Krishan Lal, P.P. City, Rampur, who is present in the Court, which is taken on record. As per status report, the adequate protection has been granted to the petitioners, however, as of now, there is no threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners. Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, states that the complainant (respondent No.8) has assured that he will not interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioners.
3. In view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the matter save and except as and when the petitioners feel need of the police protection, they may approach the police authorities concerned for their protection by filing a separate application. In case such application is filed by the petitioners for police protection, the police authorities concerned shall consider the same in accordance with law after assessing the situation. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of, so also pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
(L. Narayana Swamy)
Chief Justice
(Jyotsna Rewal Dua) December 30, 2019
Judge (Yashwant)