Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/4431/2019 on 30 December 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.4431 of 2019 Decided on: 30.12.2019 Bhupinder
....…......Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ........Respondents _______________________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice L. Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Srishti Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General, with Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Ms. Ritta Goswami and Mr. Nand Lal Thakur,
Additional
Advocate Generals, for respondent No.1/ State. Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ________________________________________________________________ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge (Oral). The grievance of the petitioner is that the certificate issued to him by respondent No.3/Grameen Mukt Vidhyalayi Shiksha Sansthan in respect of his clearing 10th class examination is not being treated to be a valid certificate by respondent No.2, i.e. H.P. Board of School Education, H.P.
2. The validity of the certificate issued by Grameen Mukt Vidhyalayi Shiksha Sansthan during the period from 01.12.2017 to 05.02.2019 has been adjudicated upon by this 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. High Court of H.P. 2019:HHC:11400-DB ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 06:41:03 :::CIS
Court in CWP No.849 of 2019 and in various other matters. The certificates issued by respondent No.3, during the aforesaid period, have been held to be valid on the basis of written instructions placed on record in the above numbered writ petition.
3. In this view of the matter, the petitioner may represent to respondent No.2, Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education, Dharamshala, accordingly within a period of two weeks from today, whereafter, respondent No.2, after verification of the 10th class certificate in accordance with law and judgment passed by this Court in CWP No.849 of 2019 and connected matters, may decide the same and take requisite action in the matter within two weeks thereafter. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly, so also pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Learned Advocate General and learned counsel for respondent No.2, are directed to communicate the gist of this judgment to the respondents, forthwith. Copy 'Dasti'.
(L. Narayana Swamy)
Chief Justice
(Jyotsna Rewal Dua) December 30, 2019
Judge (Yashwant) High Court of H.P. 2019:HHC:11400-DB ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 06:41:03 :::CIS