Himachal Pradesh High Court

ARB.C/100/2018 on 30 December 2019

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Arbitration Case No.100 of 2018 Date of decision: 30.12.2019 Himachal Pradesh Power Corporation Limited ….. Petitioner. Versus Arvind Kumar Bansal ….. Respondent.

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No

For the petitioner : None. For the respondent : None.

Ajay Mohan Goel, J. (Oral) Despite repeated calls, none has put in appearance on behalf of the parties. Accordingly, present petition is dismissed in default. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

(Ajay Mohan Goel), Judge December 30, 2019 (Rishi) 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 06:42:27 :::CIS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead